On Sep 14, 2011, at 12:22 , Ian Collins wrote:
> On 09/14/11 08:49 PM, Sami Ketola wrote:
>> On Sep 13, 2011, at 3:21 , Peter Tribble wrote:
>>> On Tue, Sep 13, 2011 at 1:50 AM, Paul B. Henson wrote:
I recently saw a message posted to the sunmanagers list complaining
about installing a
On 09/14/11 09:22 PM, Ian Collins wrote:
On 09/14/11 08:49 PM, Sami Ketola wrote:
On Sep 13, 2011, at 3:21 , Peter Tribble wrote:
Update 10 has been out for about 3 weeks.
No it has not. As of now Solaris 10 u10 has not been released.
It slipped out the back door for a couple of days a f
On 09/14/11 08:49 PM, Sami Ketola wrote:
On Sep 13, 2011, at 3:21 , Peter Tribble wrote:
On Tue, Sep 13, 2011 at 1:50 AM, Paul B. Henson wrote:
I recently saw a message posted to the sunmanagers list complaining
about installing a kernel patch and suddenly having his ACL's disappear
completel
On Sep 13, 2011, at 3:21 , Peter Tribble wrote:
> On Tue, Sep 13, 2011 at 1:50 AM, Paul B. Henson wrote:
>> I recently saw a message posted to the sunmanagers list complaining
>> about installing a kernel patch and suddenly having his ACL's disappear
>> completely whenever a chmod occurred. I re
> [...]
>
> He already opened a support ticket, they responded:
>
> -
> ZFS appears to be the only file system supporting NFSv4 ACLs
> that attempts to preserve ACLs during chmod(2) operations.
> Unfortunately, this requires the ACL to be modified in ways that are
> confusing to customers and
On Tue, Sep 13, 2011 at 12:41:36PM -0700, Ian Collins wrote:
> Not work on what way?
>
> I have a client who makes extensive (more like excessive!) use of ACLs
> on ZFS and we don't see any problems. Other than the ridiculous
> complexity of some of the ACLs that have grown over time.
>From my
On Tue, Sep 13, 2011 at 3:31 PM, Paul B. Henson wrote:
> Did update 10 sneak out under cover of darkness or what? I didn't see
> any announcements or chatter about it, google doesn't find anything, and
> the Oracle download site still only shows update 9:
It was supposed to be released on Au
On 9/13/2011 12:46 PM, Peter Tribble wrote:
Hm. They updated that a few weeks ago with a new release but you're right,
it's now back to S10U9. Which leaves me with a whole slew of boxes running
a release that doesn't exist.
Oracle Solaris 10 8/11 s10x_u10wos_17a X86
Copy
On Tue, Sep 13, 2011 at 8:34 PM, Paul B. Henson wrote:
> On 9/13/2011 5:21 AM, Peter Tribble wrote:
>
>> Update 10 has been out for about 3 weeks.
>
> Where was any announcement posted? I haven't heard anything about it. As far
> as I can tell, the Oracle site still only has update 9 available for
On 09/14/11 12:21 AM, Peter Tribble wrote:
I just tried on a U9 and U10 box. On the U10 system, I did a
simple 'chmod g+s' on a directory with an ACL, and wham, the
ACL vanished. Same operation on U9, and the ACL is preserved.
(This doesn't affect me all that much, as ACLs on ZFS have never
rea
On 9/13/2011 5:21 AM, Peter Tribble wrote:
Update 10 has been out for about 3 weeks.
Where was any announcement posted? I haven't heard anything about it. As
far as I can tell, the Oracle site still only has update 9 available for
download:
http://www.oracle.com/technetwork/server-storage/
On 9/13/2011 5:07 AM, Paul Kraus wrote:
Patch-ID# 144500-19 is the kernel update that is the kernel from
10U10
Yep, the guy posting on sunmanagers confirmed that was the patch he
installed which broke aclmode.
Did update 10 sneak out under cover of darkness or what? I didn't see
any announcem
hi
I do not have s10u10 but in s10u9 zfs get does have aclmode
but in s11x(express) zfs get does not have aclmode any more, there was
big discussion and seems that illumos has resurrect aclmode
regards
On 9/13/2011 8:21 AM, Peter Tribble wrote:
On Tue, Sep 13, 2011 at 1:50 AM, Paul B. Henson
On Tue, Sep 13, 2011 at 1:50 AM, Paul B. Henson wrote:
> I recently saw a message posted to the sunmanagers list complaining
> about installing a kernel patch and suddenly having his ACL's disappear
> completely whenever a chmod occurred. I replied and asked him to check
> if the aclmode attribute
On Mon, Sep 12, 2011 at 8:50 PM, Paul B. Henson wrote:
> I recently saw a message posted to the sunmanagers list complaining
> about installing a kernel patch and suddenly having his ACL's disappear
> completely whenever a chmod occurred. I replied and asked him to check
> if the aclmode attribute
15 matches
Mail list logo
