OpenZFS on OS X has a command called "zpool labelclear" to handle this
situation, but it rarely comes up because if you give OpenZFS on OS X a
whole device, it will automatically partition it for you.
Since MacZFS does not have the zpool labelclear command, you can achieve
the same effect by ze
Hey Jason,
not really that frustrated, as I feel I'm working my way towards the
solution with the help of you maczfs guys.
I clearly didn't think that out when telling zfs that it is ok to use
the whole disk instead of the s2 slice.
The issue seems to be that I can't tell zfs that I want to star
Yeah, zpool remove won't work on a device in a raidz vdev, nor will zpool
detach.
What does your current zpool status look like?
On Wednesday, October 29, 2014 4:19:31 AM UTC-7, jasonbelec wrote:
>
> If I understand what I'm reading here, you have a disk that is in your
> pool and the pool is r
If I understand what I'm reading here, you have a disk that is in your pool and
the pool is raidz, so you must always have the same number of devices attached
to the pool, this is a raidz law. You can replace a new one with a damaged one,
but you cannot remove the damaged one until the replace/r
thanks for the input but:
"only inactive hot spares can be removed", whereas I need to
remove/detach/whatever one disk of a raidz1 pool, no mirrors, no duplicates.
I get the impression there is no way to do that, so I might have to
build the pool from scratch again, am I right?
On 29.10.14 09:4
thanks for the input but:
"only inactive hot spares can be removed", whereas I need to
remove/detach/whatever one disk of a raidz1 pool, no mirrors, no duplicates.
I get the impression there is no way to do that, so I might have to
build the pool from scratch again, am I right?
On 29.10.14 09:
zpool attach makes a non-mirror into a mirror. zpool detach makes a mirror
into a non-mirror.
I believe you are looking for zpool remove.
On Wednesday, October 29, 2014 12:54:48 AM UTC-7, Busty wrote:
>
> Wow, thanks Bjoern for that, now I really know what was going on. I
> really appreciate th
Wow, thanks Bjoern for that, now I really know what was going on. I
really appreciate the time you took to explain all that.
The problem I'm facing is, that I can't detach the drive. A "zpool
detach pool diskx" gives me the error:
"cannot detach diskx: only applicable to mirror and replacing vdevs
Well that sure is detailed. And should be in the wiki as it is very useful and
a great overall explanation. ;)
Jason Belec
Sent from my "It's an iPod, a Phone, and an Internet Device..."
> On Oct 26, 2014, at 9:43 AM, Bjoern Kahl wrote:
>
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
>
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
(this is going to be a bit longer, but since it is a reappearing topic
I'd like to provide some background information on what happens
behind the scene)
Am 26.10.14 um 12:09 schrieb 'Busty' via zfs-macos:
> This generated a follow up question:
This generated a follow up question:
I did the zpool replace with an unformatted disk as described in the
oracle documentation. After that, zpool status showed the disk as part
of the pool, but as "disk2", not as "disk2s2". Accordingly, OSX wanted
to initialize the disk every time upon booting.
S
Yeah!
Jason Belec
Sent from my "It's an iPod, a Phone, and an Internet Device..."
> On Oct 23, 2014, at 8:01 AM, 'Busty' via zfs-macos
> wrote:
>
> This was in fact easier than I thought. What did the trick was to
> physically swap the faulty disk with a new one and then "zpool detach
> (fault
This was in fact easier than I thought. What did the trick was to
physically swap the faulty disk with a new one and then "zpool detach
(faulty disk)"
After that a "zpool replace" went like a charm.
Problem solved.
On 15.10.14 20:32, 'Busty' via zfs-macos wrote:
> In my pool, I had a disk that g
zpool status -v shows:
Server:~ busty$ zpool status -v
pool: Collection
state: DEGRADED
status: One or more devices is currently being resilvered. The pool
will continue to function, possibly in a degraded state.
action: Wait for the resilver to complete.
scrub: resilver in progress, 0,98% do
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi 'Busty',
Am 15.10.14 um 20:32 schrieb 'Busty' via zfs-macos:
> In my pool, I had a disk that got a smart error (bad block), so I
> pulled it out, installed a new one and made a "zpool replace
> disk5s2 806745480046791602". (That number was shown
In my pool, I had a disk that got a smart error (bad block), so I pulled it
out, installed a new one and made a
"zpool replace disk5s2 806745480046791602". (That number was shown when
typing "zpool status" as the missing device.)
The resilver process started, but it seems that the new disk is f
16 matches
Mail list logo
