This is more of the meaning it still has in Europe, and to a certain extent, in
Canada, although Canada, as in so many things, is halfway between. It has more of
the US meaning here in Alberta, but it has the European meaning more in Ontario,
where I lived for 14 years on two different occasions.
John W. Redelfs wrote:
At 11:41 PM, Tuesday, 10/22/02, Gary Smith wrote:
It is partially an issue of maturity/age: placing those who have not had
a line authority position requiring HP status, into the HP quorum/group,
in order to strengthen the individual and also to strengthen the quorum.
Paul Osborne wrote:
And, yes, John gave me some good pointers. I've seen how John operates
too and have watched him type letters to the list. I've seen his
computer, chair, book shelves, and table. I can visualize him right now
in my mind.
Having trouble sleeping, are we?
ducking with
Thanks for elucidating my fuzzification.
Valerie Nielsen Williams wrote:
Marc: Maybe a little ;-)I've pasted articles below on each victim.
val
Hmm. Maybe I've got my wires crossed. The one I'm thinking of worked
at the time
of her death at the FBI (which doesn't say what she did
At 21:43 10/23/2002 -0500, Gary wrote:
The Brethren had comfortable lives because they earned a comfortable
life.
Not so sure I agree, Gary. Reference Approaching Zion Chapters 4 and
5. Not so sure earned is the correct choice of terms here.
Till
At 09:22 PM 10/23/2002, Marc wrote:
the UN Security Council). Nation states are dying as institutions, and
power is
flowing up to super-regions, and down to micro-regions, so the question
will come
to make even less and less sense as the new century unfolds, imo.
--
Marc A. Schindler
I
At 21:46 10/23/2002 -0500, St Paul wrote:
I will admit that I used
to annoyed about it in the past.
Till detects that it is still unresolved
But it is the Lord's church and he can
do whatever he wants, so I have come to accept it.
You're on the right track, though
but I'm sure he had
Never, or when you die, or when Christ returns, whichever comes first.
Jon
Cousin Bill wrote:
At some point in the past, Mark wrote:
Bill brings up an interesting point. Is it a good idea to work within a
party in order to change it? Presumably the answer is yes. What if the
party
I felt the same thing when I was released from my mission. It was an almost
palpable loss.
Elmer L. Fairbank wrote:
At 02:55 10/24/2002 +, St Stephen wrote:
If a man who has previously served as elder's quorum president, then
been released, is again called to serve, he does not need to
From what I've noticed here in my ward--
Prospective Elders: 98% Inactive*
Elders: Seems like 25-30% Inactive, at least here
High Priests: 5-10% Inactive, but it seems as if the
inactivity occurs mainly for health reasons, such as
an extended hospitalization
As Paul O. noted, Prospective
-Larry-
Keys, where needed, are given to the person set apart for
a calling. He only holds those keys until he is released.
-Stephen-
How about that? That's directly opposite to what a bishop told me years back. Thanks
for the clarification.
I concur with Larry. An ordained bishop, if
At 12:10 10/24/2002 -0500, St Paul wrote:
I think we have been here before. It's a good subject. I say that the
Jews can't build a temple that the Lord will accept. A temple must be
built and consecrated to the Lord Jesus Christ and the Jews cannot do
that.
The temple in Jerusalem will be
We know that a temple will be built in Jerusalem before the Second
Coming. We also know that a temple will be built in Jackson County
before
the Savior comes. Question: will the temple in Jerusalem have to be
built
and dedicated under the authority and supervision of the Melchizedek
it comes to
comparative land measure:
http://www.globeandmail.ca/servlet/ArticleNews/PEstory/TGAM/20021024/COVISION/Comment/comment/comment_temp/1/1/4/
--
Marc A. Schindler
Spruce Grove, Alberta, Canada -- Gateway to the Boreal Parkland
We do not think that there is an incompatibility between
Here's your little second-hand chuckle for the day.
Ah, I feel sorry for those who can't get CBC Radio One. As I type this
I'm listening to a Madly Off in All Directions* concert the
Saskatchewan comedian John Elliott is giving in Pictou (pick-toe, not
pick-too), Nova Scotia, heart of bagpipe
By the time everyone reads this you'll already know that arrests have been made in
the Washington sniper case. Let's hope they've got 'em.
--
Marc A. Schindler
Spruce Grove, Alberta, Canada -- Gateway to the Boreal Parkland
We do not think that there is an incompatibility between words and
Dan:
We might be in for a surprise here. The key, I think, is in the actual
consecration of the temple. The Jews will probably build it, as a
temple,...
they won't have the authority to
consecrate it, but the actual construction could be done in the faith
that
God will provide the means once it's
Stephen,
You give some nice definitions, but can you show where these definitions
come from? I agree that the term high priest can have more than one
meaning, but there are many Church leaders who would disagree with your
Alma 13 assessment, and say that those were, indeed, high priests in the
Paul and others, just to let you know the process for the calling of a
new stake president:
The General Authorities arrive, and they first interview the current
stake presidency and high council, then the bishops, then other high
priests in the stake, etc.
The GAs don't ask to see the persons
And with reference to all others who also receive the Melchizedek
Priesthood, the scripture saith: And all those who are ordained unto
this priesthood are made like unto the Son of God, abiding a priest
continually. (JST, Heb. 7:3.) That is to say, they will be kings and
priests forever; their
Why? There's no evidence that he's resurrected. The James that ordained
Joseph Smith was James the Greater, brother of John the Apostle. This
James is brother of Jesus, who converted after the resurrection of
Christ, and became the bishop of Jerusalem, as well as author of the
book
of James. For
Stephen Beecroft:
-Larry-
Keys, where needed, are given to the person set apart for
a calling. He only holds those keys until he is released.
How about that? That's directly opposite to what a bishop
told me years back. Thanks for the clarification.
___
You're welcome. It came
-Gary-
You give some nice definitions, but can you show where these
definitions come from?
Mostly from the scriptures themselves. I am pretty sure that the Bible
never explicitly specifies that Enos was Adam's grandson, but the
meaning is clear enough that I can say that anyway. Similarly,
Gary, all this side discussion about Alma 13 and such is interesting
enough, and I'm happy enough to continue it -- though I suspect that,
upon review of the relevant teachings and a careful rereading of Alma's
words, you will agree that Alma 13 is much more inclusive than you've
been
Stephen Beecroft:
-Larry-
You're welcome. It came from the Handbook, which I don't
think has changed in this regard.
I wish I could find that bishop and ask him for a clarification.
I am sure he had (and read) the GHI, and I am also sure
that he would never intentionally have passed along
Paul Osborne:
Right. The Lord is behind the whole thing. That is what I
have been saying all along.
___
You have been taking lessons from John, haven't you! :-)
On one occasion I watched visiting general authorities
interview well into the evening looking for a new stake
26 matches
Mail list logo
