PROTECTED]
Sent: Saturday, December 21, 2002 2:26 PM
Subject: Re: [ZION] Iraq
Why? Since when do those who prefer peace bear responsibility for others'
actions?
Do we also bear the responsibility for the thousands of people who have died
in
Kashmir simply because they were trying to exercise their right
]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, December 19, 2002 3:08 PM
Subject: Re: [ZION] Iraq
Saddam will go.
And as hard as it is to imagine, I guess I, too, could be wrong.
You're not wrong this time. His days are numbered and the writing is on
the wall. I'm in favor of a war with Iraq based on what
: [ZION] Iraq
Saddam will go.
And as hard as it is to imagine, I guess I, too, could be wrong.
You're not wrong this time. His days are numbered and the writing is on
the wall. I'm in favor of a war with Iraq based on what I know about the
situation.
Paul O
[EMAIL PROTECTED
You are probably wrong.
War is not imminent because we are not ready. We will be in about one
month.
Also, I believe that the statements Bush makes are directed at Saddam
primarily, and not at the US populace. I also believe that the US is trying
very hard to get a rebellion going in Iraq,
Jon Spencer wrote:
You are probably wrong.
War is not imminent because we are not ready. We will be in about one
month.
So why did two complete naval battle groups start sailing *out of* the Middle East
earlier this week? Actually, this is an area where my prognostication has a weak
At 08:07 PM, Friday, 11/1/02, Marc A. Schindler wrote:
I'm sorry to hear that. It can be very disruptive and discouraging, and I
wish you
all the best in finding something you enjoy as soon as possible. And
seriously, if
you're a high-tech worker or a professional in various other departments,
I can only say amen. I'm also upset that I have to pay GST on things I buy from
the States. I think a US plant would rather set up in a maquiladora in Ciudad
Juarez, for instance, where environmental and labour laws are primitive, than allow
those same workers into an Arizona or Texas plant. It's
Stephen Beecroft wrote:
-Marc-
when it can dip *below* -40oC (which is also, as you probably
know, -40oF).
This is unnecessarily cruel. There was no need to preempt my favorite
smart-alek comment. Meanie.
You mean how F really means Foreignheat?
Stephen
Automobiles don't kill
Marc A. Schindler wrote:
Our foreign affairs people
are advising Canadian citizens who were born in the Middle East not to travel via the US.
=
Grampa Bill comments:
Well, that's about the best news I've heard lately!
Don't waste the atonement.
Sue Woodbury,
I'm sorry to hear that. It can be very disruptive and discouraging, and I wish you
all the best in finding something you enjoy as soon as possible. And seriously, if
you're a high-tech worker or a professional in various other departments, as a
citizen of a NAFTA country you can get a job anywhere
Ok, I was just asking. Yet, it was not entirely a throw away remark,
as
after four years at a job that was perfect for myself and family at the
time, I now find myself among the ranks of the unemployed.
O dear! I'm so sorry to hear that. I hope you get...
Paul O
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Now, if we can just stop the flow of terrorists from the US into our country that'll
be even
better.
Grampa Bill wrote:
Marc A. Schindler wrote:
Our foreign affairs people
are advising Canadian citizens who were born in the Middle East not to travel via
the US.
Double bummer. Well, look after your own emotional health, too. I've learned the
hard way that physical illness can have all kinds of psychological effects which
in turn exacerbate the physical illness. I wish I had known that before I
decided to get sick. :-/
You'll be in our prayers.
Steven
At 08:46 PM, Wednesday, 10/30/02, Marc A. Schindler wrote:
Marc A. Schindler
Spruce Grove, Alberta, Canada -- Gateway to the Boreal Parkland
Guns don't kill people; people with guns kill people.
And people with knives. And people with rocks. And people with baseball bats.
A few years ago
Things have changed indeed. Got any good job openings up there in maple
leaf land?
--
Steven Montgomery
At 02:40 PM 10/31/2002, you wrote:
You really don't want to get into this again. I'd rather face a guy with a
bat than
a guy with a firearm. Common sense. Ironically, a Canadian is now in a
At 05:42 PM, Thursday, 10/31/02, Paul Osborne wrote:
Not me, Marc. The damage done by a bat could leave me in terrible shape
with broken bones and a bashed in skull. The gun will probably kill me
and send me on my way to bliss. So, I'll take the gun bullet, please,
with a coke and an order of
September 11th was a defining moment in history, it showed that America could be
attacked within her own borders; it didn't need an ICBM as has been the thinking.
It would be tragic that when (not if) it happens again; and what could be the outcome
(will cities not buildings lay waste)?
-Marc-
Just read over Elder Nelson's talk when it comes out in the
Ensign. I myself have a difficult time seeing how people can
still, with all due respect, not get it after hearing this talk.
And I have a difficult time seeing why people are so eager to twist an
apostle's words into
Stephen Beecroft wrote:
-Marc-
Stephen, I'm not going to engage in point-by-point games here.
Life's too short,
Not that I necessarily disagree with the above, but if that's how you
feel, why are you so willing to engage in point-by-point games at
other times?
I'm human. I'm
Stephen Beecroft wrote:
-Marc-
I believe that in general prophecies tend to be broader than just
one issue, and it's we members who narrow them down (all of us, or
most of us).
I tend to agree with this. Interesting, then, that you wrote:
and Elder Nelson's words were, as far as
Actually, I do agree that this is a big mistake. Since probably at most
only 1/2 of your armed forces are fighting forces, when the Mexican army
reaches your border with the US, you may really miss those 2,000.
Jon
Marc A. Schindler wrote:
Canada ready to send 2 000 troops along with US
21 matches
Mail list logo
