-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 5 May 2006, at 02:57, David Pratt wrote:
Hi Jim and Roderigo! This is encouraging news. I have been putting
much thought into this also. There is a downside to refactoring ZEO
in that there are many folks heavily dependent on it and also
re
Rodrigo Dias Arruda Senra wrote:
...
I volunteer to help with two-hours time slices on a daily basis,
probably more on weekends.
Great. We should figure out a time to discuss what we're going to do.
I can often be found on the #zope3-dev irc channel. Otherwise,
I'll start some email discuss
David Pratt wrote:
Hi Jim and Roderigo! This is encouraging news. I have been putting much
thought into this also. There is a downside to refactoring ZEO in that
there are many folks heavily dependent on it and also reasonably happy
with it.
The refactoring we are talking about won't effect t
Jens Vagelpohl wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 5 May 2006, at 02:57, David Pratt wrote:
Hi Jim and Roderigo! This is encouraging news. I have been putting
much thought into this also. There is a downside to refactoring ZEO
in that there are many folks heavily depend
On Fri, May 05, 2006 at 07:25:50AM -0400, Jim Fulton wrote:
| >IMHO there is no downside. People would be "heavily dependent" if they
| >e.g. had programs directly interacting with ZEO internals, or
| >subclassing ZEO components. I would bet the number of people who are in
| >that position ca
Terry Jones wrote:
I've just read the ZODB/ZEO Programming Guide (Release 3.6.0,
A.M. Kuchling, January 5, 2006) and I'd like to ask a few questions.
Are the following all correct?
- The BTrees supported by ZODB have nothing to do with Berkeley DB Btrees
(apart from the fact that they're bo
Hi Florent
| For the values stuff, what people usually do is have two BTrees that hey
| keep in sync, one being the reverse of the other. Finding all values >= X
| is then simply a matter of using the proper API on the reverse Tree (and
| it's fast).
Ok, thanks. People on zope-dev pointed me to Z
Sidnei da Silva wrote:
...
Oh, if I'm allowed to speak *wink*, it would be great if in this
refactoring 'zrpc' could be made to work with less dependencies.
I'm using 'zrpc' on a project and it was a pain to implement a
minimally working application because it depended on a few convoluted
step
On Fri, May 05, 2006 at 10:32:12AM -0400, Jim Fulton wrote:
| Sidnei da Silva wrote:
| ...
| >Oh, if I'm allowed to speak *wink*, it would be great if in this
| >refactoring 'zrpc' could be made to work with less dependencies.
| >
| >I'm using 'zrpc' on a project and it was a pain to implement a
|
