Re: [zones-discuss] netmask warning, misconfiguration

2007-11-30 Thread Jordan Brown (Sun)
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > What does the "netmasks" entry in /etc/nsswitch.conf say? A common > issue is that a user changes their local /etc/netmasks file but their > the switch says to use something like "nis". Bingo! Thanks! >> (I also tried 172.20.0.0 on the theory that maybe it wanted me t

Re: [zones-discuss] Simple question... An inherit-pkg-dir resource with the dir '/lib' alre

2007-11-30 Thread David Smith
Thank you to everyone who replied so quickly... Basically the inherit-pkg-dir's are by default. Thanks, David This message posted from opensolaris.org ___ zones-discuss mailing list zones-discuss@opensolaris.org

Re: [zones-discuss] netmask warning, misconfiguration

2007-11-30 Thread David . Comay
> zoneadm: zone 'int-sagent-1-z1': WARNING: bge0:1: no matching subnet > found in netmasks(4) for 172.20.46.188; using default of 255.255.0.0. > > but my /etc/netmasks (on both the global and local zone) looks good: What does the "netmasks" entry in /etc/nsswitch.conf say? A common issue is that

[zones-discuss] Simple question... An inherit-pkg-dir resource with the dir '/lib' already

2007-11-30 Thread David Smith
I'm getting an error on trying to create a second zone. -bash-3.00# zonecfg -z test123 -f test123-zone-cmd.txt On line 7 of test123-zone-cmd.txt: An inherit-pkg-dir resource with the dir '/lib' already exists. resource specification incomplete Zone test123 failed to verify test123: Insufficient s

Re: [zones-discuss] netmask warning, misconfiguration

2007-11-30 Thread Jordan Brown (Sun)
Antonello Cruz wrote: > I would definitely run > > zonecfg -z int-sagent-1-z1 info > > to check what the zone thinks is the netmask. Doesn't display a netmask. > I suspect if you haven't defined the '/24' it will pick the default for > the address class. In this case, '/16' IIRC. > Sometimes d

Re: [zones-discuss] Simple question... An inherit-pkg-dir resource with the dir '/lib' already

2007-11-30 Thread Enda O'Connor
David Smith wrote: > I'm getting an error on trying to create a second zone. > > -bash-3.00# zonecfg -z test123 -f test123-zone-cmd.txt > On line 7 of test123-zone-cmd.txt: > An inherit-pkg-dir resource with the dir '/lib' already exists. > resource specification incomplete > Zone test123 failed t

Re: [zones-discuss] Simple question... An inherit-pkg-dir resource with the dir '/lib' already

2007-11-30 Thread Jerry Jelinek
David Smith wrote: > I'm getting an error on trying to create a second zone. > > -bash-3.00# zonecfg -z test123 -f test123-zone-cmd.txt > On line 7 of test123-zone-cmd.txt: > An inherit-pkg-dir resource with the dir '/lib' already exists. > resource specification incomplete > Zone test123 failed

Re: [zones-discuss] netmask warning, misconfiguration

2007-11-30 Thread Antonello Cruz
I would definitely run zonecfg -z int-sagent-1-z1 info to check what the zone thinks is the netmask. I suspect if you haven't defined the '/24' it will pick the default for the address class. In this case, '/16' IIRC. Sometimes documentation gets old... Antonello Jordan Brown (Sun) wrote: > An

Re: [zones-discuss] netmask warning, misconfiguration

2007-11-30 Thread Jordan Brown (Sun)
Antonello Cruz wrote: >> zoneadm: zone 'int-sagent-1-z1': WARNING: bge0:1: no matching subnet >> found in netmasks(4) for 172.20.46.188; using default of 255.255.0.0. > How did you setup the IP address for that zone? > > Did you use, in zonecfg: > zonecfg:int-sagent-1-z1:net> set address=172.20.4

Re: [zones-discuss] Shared-ip routing and VNI interface

2007-11-30 Thread sowmini . varadhan
On (11/30/07 08:25), Mike Gerdts wrote: > The 10.1.1.100 address must not be reachable. The last time I tried > this in Nevada it causes a panic. The last time I tried it on S10 it > causes one kernel thread to spin (mpstat will show one CPU at 100% > sys). > > Through bugs.opensolaris.org I ope

Re: [zones-discuss] Solaris Containers Replication

2007-11-30 Thread Ihsan Zaghmouth
Hi Paul, 1. Clone them localy 2. Detach the Cloned Zones (zoneadm -z zonename detach) 3. Tar or pax them over starting from the zonepath and remote copy the tarballs or simply export/import SAN DG hosting the zones. 4. Prepare them for attachment, zonecfg -z zonename and at prompt >

Re: [zones-discuss] Can't install zone after 10_recommended

2007-11-30 Thread Mangan
This was the problem. Thanks to Richard Lowe and Enda Oconnor for getting me on the right track and pointing me to the workaround. -Original Message- >From: Richard Lowe <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >Sent: Nov 29, 2007 11:38 AM >To: Mangan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >Cc: zones-discuss@opensolaris.org >Su

Re: [zones-discuss] Shared-ip routing and VNI interface

2007-11-30 Thread Mike Gerdts
On Nov 30, 2007 7:37 AM, Paul Van Der Zwan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Host 1: > global zone bge0 192.168.1.1/24 > vni0 10.1.1.254/24 > zone1 vni1 10.1.1.1/24 > zone2 vni2 10.1.1.2/24 > zone3 vni3 10.1.1.3/24 When you try this configuration, go i

[zones-discuss] Solaris Containers Replication

2007-11-30 Thread Paul F Mazzola
Need recommendation to determine the best way for replicating Solaris Containers. Here is the situation: (1) We built 4 containers for a customer on 2 different physical hosts. Root file systems are shared. (2) Customer installed all their applications, packages etc. Now customer wan

[zones-discuss] Shared-ip routing and VNI interface

2007-11-30 Thread Paul Van Der Zwan
I am wondering if the following setup on S10u4 with local zones will work, or can be made to work. The setup is meant be used as a backend for a loadbalancer which uses the direct-return method, that is, no NAT but the balanced service talks directly to the client. In all zones running a service

Re: [zones-discuss] netmask warning, misconfiguration

2007-11-30 Thread Antonello Cruz
Jordan, How did you setup the IP address for that zone? Did you use, in zonecfg: zonecfg:int-sagent-1-z1:net> set address=172.20.46.188/24 ? Antonello Jordan Brown (Sun) wrote: > I get: > > zoneadm: zone 'int-sagent-1-z1': WARNING: bge0:1: no matching subnet > found in netmasks(4) for 172.20.