Hi,
IHAC who want to use DSR(Direct Server Return) mode with Shared-IP
zones like following URL.
(http://www.inlab.de/balanceng/example3.html)
CU told me DSR is very common technology in Linux world.
I wonder Explicit-IP zones make this config running.
But, Explicit-IP zones make no sense so
Hi Hidehiko,
We are implementing an in-kernel Load Balancer which will
support DSR mode (amongst other things). The details and
project page should go up on OpenSolaris soon. You can
use this to front a bunch of servers (both real and
virtual).
Alternatively, you can build a virtual network in a
[I've removed the internal address from this reply.]
Hidehiko Jono writes:
I wonder Explicit-IP zones make this config running.
But, Explicit-IP zones make no sense so that CU want to make about 20
zones on each server.
You should not need to use exclusive IP stack instances in order to
make
Darren Reed writes:
2) it would seem the next place worth going is:
zoneadm subcommand [all options]
3) but what I'd rather do is:
zoneadm subcommand zonename [all-options-except -z]
You might want to review the CLIP specification and companion, as the
above goal seems to be out of step
On Fri, Jun 20, 2008 at 09:59:31AM -0400, James Carlson wrote:
Darren Reed writes:
2) it would seem the next place worth going is:
zoneadm subcommand [all options]
3) but what I'd rather do is:
zoneadm subcommand zonename [all-options-except -z]
You might want to review the CLIP
James Carlson wrote:
Darren Reed writes:
2) it would seem the next place worth going is:
zoneadm subcommand [all options]
3) but what I'd rather do is:
zoneadm subcommand zonename [all-options-except -z]
You might want to review the CLIP specification and companion, as the
above
Darren Reed wrote:
Hmmm, I think I prefer the bottom one, but I can't see why
either precludes the other as I'm pretty confident no sane
person will ever want a zone name that matches a uuid and
code could easily be written to cover this.
Are zones required to have names?
If so, one case
Jordan Brown wrote:
Darren Reed wrote:
Hmmm, I think I prefer the bottom one, but I can't see why
either precludes the other as I'm pretty confident no sane
person will ever want a zone name that matches a uuid and
code could easily be written to cover this.
Are zones required to have
