[zones-discuss] problem with pkg deployment and zones

2007-08-07 Thread mario heimel
we have installed our packages in all global and non-global zones. the packages will also be propagated to all future, newly installed non-global zones but the pre/postinstall scripts from our packages does not run at zone installation. the pre/postinstall scripts was not saved at the initial i

[zones-discuss] Creating a Virtualization Community Group

2007-08-07 Thread Brandorr
Discussion on the OGB-discuss list regarding creating a LDOM (Logical Domain) Community, has again brought up the question of whether to form a combined virtualization community group. (With XEN, LDOM, and Zones all being working groups in the CG, and individual projects likely falling within the s

Re: [zones-discuss] Creating a Virtualization Community Group

2007-08-07 Thread Ellard Roush
Hi, There is so much discussion in these areas that it would be most undesirable to combine these 3 different areas. Recommend that they be kept distinct. However, I do agree that there are topics that would appeal to all 3 areas. In such cases recommend that people send their comments to the 3

Re: [zones-discuss] [brandz-discuss] Creating a Virtualization Community Group

2007-08-07 Thread Nils Nieuwejaar
On Tue 08/07/07 at 16:18 PM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > Discussion on the OGB-discuss list regarding creating a LDOM (Logical > Domain) Community, has again brought up the question of whether to form a > combined virtualization community group. (With XEN, LDOM, and Zones all > being working groups

Re: [zones-discuss] [brandz-discuss] Creating a Virtualization Community Group

2007-08-07 Thread Dan Price
On Tue 07 Aug 2007 at 04:29PM, Nils Nieuwejaar wrote: > On Tue 08/07/07 at 16:18 PM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > > Discussion on the OGB-discuss list regarding creating a LDOM (Logical > > Domain) Community, has again brought up the question of whether to form a > > combined virtualization community

Re: [zones-discuss] Creating a Virtualization Community Group

2007-08-07 Thread James Carlson
Ellard Roush writes: > There is so much discussion in these areas that it would be most > undesirable to combine these 3 different areas. An excess of discussion sounds like stuff that belongs on a narrower project or subgroup mailing list, not a reason to avoid a community group focusing on virtu

Re: [zones-discuss] Creating a Virtualization Community Group

2007-08-07 Thread Mike Gerdts
On 8/7/07, Ellard Roush <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hi, > > There is so much discussion in these areas that it would be most > undesirable to combine these 3 different areas. Combining communities does not mean that they all share the same mailing lists. zones-discuss, xen-discuss, et. al. would

Re: [zones-discuss] [brandz-discuss] Creating a Virtualization Community Group

2007-08-07 Thread Russ Petruzzelli
[EMAIL PROTECTED] often discusses virtualization in a general sense. I often see people bring up questions regarding comparing different virtualization implementations. Has it been considered to use this? (Granted the alias name appears to limit the focus to vmware...) Russ Nils Nieuwe

Re: [zones-discuss] [brandz-discuss] Creating a Virtualization Community Group

2007-08-07 Thread Tony Kay
Hi Russ On 7 Aug 2007, at 15:14, Russ Petruzzelli wrote: > [EMAIL PROTECTED] often discusses virtualization in a general > sense. I often see people bring up questions regarding comparing > different virtualization implementations. It is at this point an internal alias and I don't see this

Re: [zones-discuss] [brandz-discuss] Creating a Virtualization Community Group

2007-08-07 Thread Dan Price
On Tue 07 Aug 2007 at 04:14PM, Tony Kay wrote: > Hi Russ > > On 7 Aug 2007, at 15:14, Russ Petruzzelli wrote: > > > [EMAIL PROTECTED] often discusses virtualization in a general > > sense. I often see people bring up questions regarding comparing > > different virtualization implementations.

Re: [zones-discuss] Can the network interface of a local zone get adynamic ipv4 address?

2007-08-07 Thread Lu, Baolu
> > Also, note that a zone which uses this feature will have *exclusive* > access to this NIC. No other zone, even the global zone, will be able > to use this NIC. > > Oh, thanks. It works now. BTW, How about bind a vnic (crossbow) to the zone? Can the vnic get a dynamic IP v4 address? __

Re: [zones-discuss] Non-global zone and nfs mounts from global zone

2007-08-07 Thread Lu, Baolu
On , [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > Hi all, > > We see below now works on a machine with Solaris10 update 2 but with > latest patches. If it works that means it is supported or not? > > Q: Can a non-global zone NFS-mount a file system that has been shared > from its own global zone? A: No. This may

[zones-discuss] Creating a Virtualization Community Group

2007-08-07 Thread Jerry Kemp
+1 keep them separated. Jerry Ellard Roush wrote: > Hi, > > There is so much discussion in these areas that it would be most > undesirable to combine these 3 different areas. > > Recommend that they be kept distinct. > > However, I do agree that there are topics that would appeal to > all 3

Re: [zones-discuss] [xen-discuss] Creating a Virtualization Community Group

2007-08-07 Thread David Edmondson
On Tue, Aug 07, 2007 at 04:18:18PM -0400, Brandorr wrote: > Discussion on the OGB-discuss list regarding creating a LDOM (Logical > Domain) Community, has again brought up the question of whether to form a > combined virtualization community group. (With XEN, LDOM, and Zones all > being working gro