Ellard Roush writes: > There is so much discussion in these areas that it would be most > undesirable to combine these 3 different areas.
An excess of discussion sounds like stuff that belongs on a narrower project or subgroup mailing list, not a reason to avoid a community group focusing on virtualization. It's the difference between choosing 'opensolaris-discuss' versus 'myproject-dev' when figuring out where to send a message. > Recommend that they be kept distinct. > > However, I do agree that there are topics that would appeal to > all 3 areas. In such cases recommend that people send their > comments to the 3 discussion aliases in a single email. Note that communities get to steer their technologies independently. Is it good for Solaris if these three groups end up with conflicting choices for common components, such as software install and management? If that's not good, then I'd suggest that a single virtualization group would be a good way to start. In fact, other than a possibly excessive list of community group leaders and core contributors, I find it a little hard to understand why separate CGs would be helpful here. -- James Carlson, Solaris Networking <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sun Microsystems / 1 Network Drive 71.232W Vox +1 781 442 2084 MS UBUR02-212 / Burlington MA 01803-2757 42.496N Fax +1 781 442 1677 _______________________________________________ zones-discuss mailing list zones-discuss@opensolaris.org
