Log message for revision 30528:
removed pre-Five-1.0 cruft (this file does not belong to Five 1.0)
Changed:
D Zope/branches/Zope-2_8-branch/lib/python/Products/Five/api.py
-=-
Deleted: Zope/branches/Zope-2_8-branch/lib/python/Products/Five/api.py
Update of /cvs-repository/Zope/doc
In directory cvs.zope.org:/tmp/cvs-serv13610/doc
Modified Files:
Tag: Zope-2_7-branch
CHANGES.txt
Log Message:
- Collector #889: made 'and' operator for KeywordIndexes actually
restrict results as expected (thanks to 'aroda' for the
Log message for revision 30532:
Made 'and' operator for KeywordIndexes actually restrict results as expected.
Collector #889 -- thanks to 'aroda' for the patch!
Changed:
U Zope/branches/Zope-2_8-branch/doc/CHANGES.txt
U
Log message for revision 30533:
Forward port fix for Collector #889 from 2.8 branch.
Changed:
U
Zope/trunk/lib/python/Products/PluginIndexes/KeywordIndex/tests/testKeywordIndex.py
U Zope/trunk/lib/python/Products/PluginIndexes/common/UnIndex.py
-=-
Modified:
Log message for revision 30543:
Use a properly constructed tag for the Zope3 code.
Changed:
_U Zope/branches/Zope-2_8-branch/lib/python/
-=-
Property changes on: Zope/branches/Zope-2_8-branch/lib/python
___
Name:
Dieter Maurer wrote:
I strongly argue against it. Fix hasattr in the Zope context,
instead!
_marker = []
def hasattr(obj, attr, marker):
a = getattr(obj, attr, _marker)
return a is not _marker
import __builtin__
__builtin__.hasattr = hasattr
Easy
On Fri, May 27, 2005 at 08:53:54AM +0100, Chris Withers wrote:
Anyone think putting this in Zope core is a good idea?
If so, where should it go?
Any potential performance implications people can think of?
fwiw, tonight I ran some quick request-per-second tests
(using ab -n 100 -c 10) on a
A TALES expression may be prohibitively expensive in any case, no
matter how simple it is kept. Please make sure to do some comparative
profiling. Cache keys are recomputed on every call of the script,
AFAICS. The thought of doing this in restricted Python makes my skin
crawl.
Stefan
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Chris Withers wrote:
Dieter Maurer wrote:
I strongly argue against it. Fix hasattr in the Zope context,
instead!
_marker = []
def hasattr(obj, attr, marker):
a = getattr(obj, attr, _marker)
return a is not _marker
Dieter Maurer wrote at 2005-5-13 19:26 +0200:
... high Zope startup time ...
To overcome this obstacle, we tweaked Zope and fixed Python's import
mechanism such that Zope now starts either out of a ZIP archive
or as a frozen application.
...
In more details, we did:
* implement a package for
[Tres Seaver]
[...]
- -1. Python's 'hasattr' semantics are *broken by definition*, and will
never be fixed (because of backward compatibility). Non-Zope Python
programmers will *not* expect or want exceptions raised from 'hasattr'.
As a local patch, this isn't too bad (one could even
Tim Peters wrote:
[Tres Seaver]
[...]
- -1. Python's 'hasattr' semantics are *broken by definition*, and will
never be fixed (because of backward compatibility). Non-Zope Python
programmers will *not* expect or want exceptions raised from 'hasattr'.
As a local patch, this isn't too bad (one
On Fri, May 27, 2005 at 09:25:58AM -0400, Jim Fulton wrote:
Tim Peters wrote:
OTOH, defining importing a utility function-- say, safehasattr()
--would make it all explicit. That's what ZODB does.
OK.
(BTW, I just went grepping for this safehasattr() in zope 2.7.6's
ZODB and didn't find
Paul Winkler wrote:
On Fri, May 27, 2005 at 09:25:58AM -0400, Jim Fulton wrote:
Tim Peters wrote:
OTOH, defining importing a utility function-- say, safehasattr()
--would make it all explicit. That's what ZODB does.
OK.
(BTW, I just went grepping for this safehasattr() in zope
[Tim Peters]
OTOH, defining importing a utility function-- say, safehasattr()
--would make it all explicit. That's what ZODB does.
[Paul Winkler]
OK.
(BTW, I just went grepping for this safehasattr() in zope 2.7.6's
ZODB and didn't find anything. What's it called?)
No such thing in ZODB
On Fri, May 27, 2005 at 11:52:10AM -0400, Tim Peters wrote:
Spend an hour analyzing each one 0.9 wink.
Let's compromise. I'll spend 0.9 hours analyzing one of them. ;-)
--
Paul Winkler
http://www.slinkp.com
___
Zope-Dev maillist -
On Fri, May 27, 2005 at 11:49:03AM -0400, Jim Fulton wrote:
BTW, I prefer to code things like this in the following way:
def safe_hasattr():
marker = object()
def safe_hasattr(obj, attr):
return getattr(obj, attr, marker) is not marker
return safe_hasattr
On Fri, May 27, 2005 at 12:08:55PM -0400, Paul Winkler wrote:
On Fri, May 27, 2005 at 11:49:03AM -0400, Jim Fulton wrote:
BTW, I prefer to code things like this in the following way:
def safe_hasattr():
marker = object()
def safe_hasattr(obj, attr):
return
Paul Winkler wrote:
On Fri, May 27, 2005 at 12:08:55PM -0400, Paul Winkler wrote:
On Fri, May 27, 2005 at 11:49:03AM -0400, Jim Fulton wrote:
BTW, I prefer to code things like this in the following way:
def safe_hasattr():
marker = object()
def safe_hasattr(obj, attr):
On Fri, May 27, 2005 at 01:10:29PM -0400, Jim Fulton wrote:
Paul Winkler wrote:
On Fri, May 27, 2005 at 12:08:55PM -0400, Paul Winkler wrote:
On Fri, May 27, 2005 at 11:49:03AM -0400, Jim Fulton wrote:
BTW, I prefer to code things like this in the following way:
def safe_hasattr():
[Paul Winkler]
But of course we don't do it because accessing globals in a method that
might be looped over is slow. Which, hopefully, will become a non-issue
some day (PEP 267, 268, 280).
[Jim Fulton]
Note that in my version above, marker is a local rather than a global
and gets looked up
This is amazing. Really amazing. I stand corrected.
Jim
Tim Peters wrote:
[Paul Winkler]
But of course we don't do it because accessing globals in a method that
might be looped over is slow. Which, hopefully, will become a non-issue
some day (PEP 267, 268, 280).
[Jim Fulton]
Note
[Jim Fulton, on cell dereferencing's (lack of) speed]
This is amazing. Really amazing. I stand corrected.
Well, there's no mystery if you look at LOAD_FAST and LOAD_DEREF in
ceval.c; LOAD_DEREF is slower wink.
The relative speed of approaches changes across Python releases too.
For example,
On Fri, May 27, 2005 at 01:49:00PM -0400, Tim Peters wrote:
| Under WinXP Python 2.4.1, the global trick (lookup3) is consistently
| fastest, and the lexical scope trick (lookup2) is consistently
| slowest; this is typical output across 3 runs:
Humm... May not be a surprise for you, but in one
On Fri, May 27, 2005 at 01:49:00PM -0400, Tim Peters wrote:
Nope, it's a cell reference to an enclosing scope, and gets looked
up at cell-dereference speed. In my experience, that's generally a
bit slower than accessing a module global. That may have to do with a
quirk of MSVC's code
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Tim Peters wrote:
Vewy strange -- it looks as though OS-level caching matters here:
$ python
Python 2.4.1 (#2, Mar 30 2005, 21:51:10)
[GCC 3.3.5 (Debian 1:3.3.5-8ubuntu2)] on linux2
Type help, copyright, credits or license for more information.
$
We're getting the usual timing results here: it's a cross-platform,
cross-release crapshoot. Aiming at (just) a few percent really is
worthless -- modern processors and OSes are too complex to out-think
uniformly in the small, and even if Python variability didn't
contribute to the differences.
Am Freitag, den 27.05.2005, 00:20 +0200 schrieb Jaroslav Lukesh:
...
I absolutelly agree with you, it is like my words.
But separation of logic and presentation could be done successfully in DTML
too. ZPT, which have separation argument is not as easy to make totally
This is even somewhat
Wow, thanks for the replies guys. It's good to hear I am not the only
one who likes DTML.
Tino, thanks for the explanations. I have some thoughts below on
that, and keep in mind, I am questioning from my own ignorance.
Tino Wrote:
The major drawbacks of DTML are:
- one namespace (with
Paul Winkler wrote:
marker = ()
if getattr(some_object, marker) is not marker:
For good measure, I wonder if that should be a [], no a ()?
cheers,
Chris
--
Simplistix - Content Management, Zope Python Consulting
- http://www.simplistix.co.uk
Tino Wildenhain wrote:
Unfortunately Plone is still a bad example for ZPT. It is getting
better but still it has a lot of code and definition in the templates.
Maybe AT would be a way out.
AT? As in ArcheTypes? You ARE kidding right? I've never seen such bad
code, and in particular, abuse of
Dieter Maurer wrote:
Only the default is latin-1 (as specified by the HTML
specification).
Indeed, but that should be configurable...
Chris
--
Simplistix - Content Management, Zope Python Consulting
- http://www.simplistix.co.uk
On 5/27/05, Chris Withers [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
AT? As in ArcheTypes? You ARE kidding right? I've never seen such bad
code, and in particular, abuse of ZPT in my entire life...
And DTML sux, you wanna use it, fine, that says something about you. Use
ZClasses, Plone, AT and XUF at the same
On Fri, May 27, 2005 at 08:51:58AM +0100, Chris Withers wrote:
Paul Winkler wrote:
marker = ()
if getattr(some_object, marker) is not marker:
For good measure, I wonder if that should be a [], no a ()?
What's wrong with a tuple? There's no reason to mutate the marker.
--
Paul Winkler
With a dtml-script I renders data from a mysql-database. But, sometimes I
should like to save the html-code generated by the script. When I try to do
this with a pythonscript I run into problems with acquiring the html-code
generated by the dtml-script. I looks like the dtml-script does not get
On May 26, 2005, at 22:34, J Cameron Cooper wrote:
Oscar Figueiredo wrote:
this might be trivial but I just can't find a way to do it. How
does one
replace the initial UserFolder at Zope root with a
LDAPUSerFolder ? I tried the dummy way : delete the acl_users
with an intent to
On 5/26/05, Greg Fischer [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Is DTML really that much harder to use?
Nah, but it's uglier. Also, the idea is that a web editor that
confirms to the tsandard of ignoring things it doens't understand,
should in theory be usable with TAL, but not with DTML. In practice,
hi,
how do i receive mails using Zope mailhost??
Do You Yahoo!? Yahoo! Small Business - Try our new Resources site!___
Zope maillist - Zope@zope.org
http://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope
** No cross posts or HTML encoding! **
(Related
--On Freitag, 27. Mai 2005 3:15 Uhr -0700 Varun Parange
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
hi,
how do i receive mails using Zope mailhost??
MailHost is only for *sending* but not for receiving mails. Zope is *not*
an SMTP server.
-aj
pgpSF9JJiUCyr.pgp
Description: PGP signature
Paul Winkler [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Fri, May 27, 2005 at 08:51:58AM +0100, Chris Withers wrote:
Paul Winkler wrote:
marker = ()
if getattr(some_object, marker) is not marker:
For good measure, I wonder if that should be a [], no a ()?
What's wrong with a tuple? There's no
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Paul Winkler wrote:
On Fri, May 27, 2005 at 08:51:58AM +0100, Chris Withers wrote:
Paul Winkler wrote:
marker = ()
if getattr(some_object, marker) is not marker:
For good measure, I wonder if that should be a [], no a ()?
What's wrong with
Hong Yuan wrote at 2005-5-27 00:07 +0800:
If a PythonScript is called from a Page Template, how can it access the
variables defined using:
tal:define=global ... /
in the calling script?
It may work to bind the namespace binding.
Not sure, though...
--
Dieter
Flemming Bjerke wrote at 2005-5-27 11:20 +0200:
With a dtml-script I renders data from a mysql-database. But, sometimes I
should like to save the html-code generated by the script. When I try to do
this with a pythonscript I run into problems with acquiring the html-code
generated by the
Paul Winkler wrote at 2005-5-27 05:07 -0400:
...
What's wrong with a tuple? There's no reason to mutate the marker.
The Python spec allows implementations to identify immutable objects
with the same value. Thus, in principle, two () created
at different times can in fact be the same object.
Paul Winkler wrote at 2005-5-26 19:57 -0400:
...
Make it so! :-)
_marker = []
def hasattr(obj, attr, marker):
I introduced a bug here (noticed by Alec Mitchell).
The marker argument should have been _marker=_marker.
...
Are you currently running zope with a patch like this?
On Fri, May 27, 2005 at 01:58:44PM +0200, Florent Guillaume wrote:
And all empty tuples are equal.
Not just equal, but all empty tuples are *identical*,
so () is () == True.
I had no idea this was so :-\
In python 2.3, the idiom most commonly found is to use marker = object().
Thanks for
On Fri, May 27, 2005 at 03:26:04PM +0200, Dieter Maurer wrote:
A higher risk comes from the fact that some Python packages may
rely on the broken hasattr behaviour. That's the reason why
the problem is not fixed in Python itself.
And that's a very good reason not to monkeypatch it.
We can't
Fredag den 27. maj 2005 15:33 skrev Dieter Maurer:
Flemming Bjerke wrote at 2005-5-27 11:20 +0200:
With a dtml-script I renders data from a mysql-database. But, sometimes I
should like to save the html-code generated by the script. When I try to
do this with a pythonscript I run into problems
Is there any way to open a .doc files using dtml or script and print them??
Yahoo! Mail
Stay connected, organized, and protected. Take the tour___
Zope maillist - Zope@zope.org
http://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope
** No cross posts or HTML
On Fri, 27 May 2005, Allen Huang wrote:
Is there any way to open a .doc files using dtml or script and print them??
The short answer is it depends. To make such files generally available
you have to convert them to HTML so arbirary browsers can access them.
You can use MS Word to do the
Using DTML from WYSIWYG editors is definitely a drawback. But, how
many of us use them for doing our work? I might use Dreamweaver to
clean up my sliced web template, but soon as I start my Zope work,
it's all Crimson Editor coding by hand to Zope. Using Dreamweaver
actually slows me down, it's
The short answer is it depends. To make such files generally available
you have to convert them to HTML so arbirary browsers can access them.
You can use MS Word to do the conversion. If your Zope is running on a
Windows machine that also has Word, you can manage the conversion
dynamically
Ah you are right. Just occured to me. That is kind of a pain in
DTML, but I've learned how to deal with it. Makes sense.
If I already have an object, say from a form submitted, in the REQUEST
namespace, and I then retrieve data from sql and a column has the same
name, I will have an issue.
Jens Vagelpohl wrote:
On May 26, 2005, at 22:34, J Cameron Cooper wrote:
Oscar Figueiredo wrote:
this might be trivial but I just can't find a way to do it. How
does one
replace the initial UserFolder at Zope root with a LDAPUSerFolder ?
I tried the dummy way : delete the acl_users
hi,
i have downloaded an SMTP server and using it i can send mails with the help of Zope MailHost
however i would also like to recieve mails how do i do this.
which additional products do i need to download...
regards,
varun
__Do You
Varun Parange wrote:
i have downloaded an SMTP server and using it i can send mails with the
help of Zope MailHost
however i would also like to recieve mails how do i do this.
which additional products do i need to download...
I recall some people talking about actually turning
Varun Parange wrote:
hi,
i have downloaded an SMTP server and using it i can send mails with
the help of Zope MailHost
however i would also like to recieve mails how do i do this.
which additional products do i need to download...
regards,
varun
Varun,
I wrote a spam
On Tue, May 24, 2005 at 08:59:01PM +0200, Dieter Maurer wrote:
An incredibly long time ago, I filed a feature request for
hasattr_unacquired -- together with patch, unit tests and documentation
update.
Do you mean this?
http://www.zope.org/Collectors/Zope/742
the unit tests and docs are
Three questions, in order of importance (to me):
1) Is it possible to validate an (uploaded) XML file against a schema
(currently on the Zope server)?
What, if any, extra packages are needed?I want to use this in my
upload forms to alert the user if their files are invalid.
2) I
On 24/05/05, J Cameron Cooper [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Personally, I'd probably just do something like::
{1,2,3}[1:-1].split(',')
This code works as expected... Thanks! :)
--
Fernando Lujan
___
Zope maillist - Zope@zope.org
+---[ Jonathan Cyr ]--
| Damn users, using all this imperfect software. These Kids Today! ;-)
|
| Easy Big Fella, Whooa.
|
You must be new here We've all learnt to ignore Chris...
He gets easily confused... or maybe he doesn't take his medication... not
sure, but,
Zope itself has no native XML support. However there are some products like
ParsedXML that provide additional functionality. You might also look at
Silva CMS
which is provides native XML support.
-aj
--On 27. Mai 2005 14:53:40 -0600 Nikko Wolf [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
Three questions, in
62 matches
Mail list logo
