Summary of messages to the zope-tests list.
Period Thu Jan 26 12:01:01 2006 UTC to Fri Jan 27 12:01:01 2006 UTC.
There were 8 messages: 8 from Zope Unit Tests.
Tests passed OK
---
Subject: OK : Zope-2_6-branch Python-2.1.3 : Linux
From: Zope Unit Tests
Date: Thu Jan 26 21:03:05 EST
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Oh well... no news is not always good news. I could also mean that PHP
is much more popular and under more surveillance while python is only
good known to professional crackers...
The problem is, that in this usecase we won't be able to use Zope if
--On 27. Januar 2006 09:38:12 +0100 Sven Deichmann [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Oh well... no news is not always good news. I could also mean that PHP
is much more popular and under more surveillance while python is only
good known to professional
Sven Deichmann schrieb:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Oh well... no news is not always good news. I could also mean that PHP
is much more popular and under more surveillance while python is only
good known to professional crackers...
The problem is, that in this usecase we
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Well, acutally secureness in this case has not really something to do
with protection against attackers. It's more secureness in the sense of
consistency and data security.
The system has to be determined in every way and every step must be
reversible
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Well. But when will that be? And when will Plone be ported to Z3? And
when will Plone be certified? ;)
And after all: Is Z3 ready to use? :D
Sven
Andreas Jung schrieb:
--On 27. Januar 2006 09:38:12 +0100 Sven Deichmann
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
I've been assigned to integrate an existing academic portal in Plone
with the OAI-PMH protocol as a data provider. Searching through this
list I found the message below, but no response.
On 2/4/05, Yuri [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
There are several (at least two...) products to manage OAI with
Alan Milligan wrote:
We haven't had any problems in building Squid-3.x images
...with ESI enabled?
I've also heard of at least one other abandoned Squid3 rollout, and it's
quite possible that without Robert's participation, Squid3 isn't really
production strength.
Yup, that and Squid 3's
David wrote:
I moved to Apache (for SSL) because its independent of Zope and it will
give you SSL and the power of a world class server when you need it.
ZopeSSL worked fine (when i last tried it, like zope 2.4x).
For SSL and HTTP sanitisation, I wouldn't trust anything that doesn't
get the
Thanks to everyone for their comments and suggestions!
I have decided to upgrade our Zope 2.6 application (which consists of 276
scripts/methods/external methods, 5 zcatalogs and 5 sets of zclasses) to
Zope 2.9 and Five - as this appears to be a somewhat less painful migration
than making a
Peter Bengtsson wrote:
On 1/26/06, Brian Lloyd [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The ClassSecurityInfo is a convenience to provide a
halfway-sane spelling for a lot of ugliness under the
hood in setting up security.
IntializeClass (among other things) tells the CSI to
apply itself to the class to set
It appears that product refreshing is futile in Zope 2.9 which is
according to zope.org the current stable version :( Think again.
According to:
http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.comp.web.zope.z3base.five/977
Philipp von Weitershausen informs us that if you have a product that
uses Five in zope2
On 1/27/06, Florent Guillaume [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Peter Bengtsson wrote:
On 1/26/06, Brian Lloyd [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The ClassSecurityInfo is a convenience to provide a
halfway-sane spelling for a lot of ugliness under the
hood in setting up security.
IntializeClass (among
Migrating systems to 2.9.0, we have noticed sluggish behavior compared
to 2.8.4. The 2.8.4 systems run on a dual processor AMD2600 32-bit
processors. The 2.9.0 systems run on AMD dual opteron 240 processors.
The dual opteron systems have much more memory, much faster memory, and
faster
Peter Bengtsson wrote at 2006-1-27 16:42 +:
...
But, in that example they are using Five and I'm not. I've just got a
Zope 2.9 install and a python product that I started on before Five
even existed. Does that give us any hope for non-Five python products?
Anybody?
I cannot believe that they
Andreas Jung wrote at 2006-1-27 07:04 +0100:
...
Importing stuff from a new Zope version into an older Zope version was
_never_ a supported feature. Only import between _identical_ versions.
Anything else makes little sense and is unsupported.
Of course, you might be happy when you can import
--On 27. Januar 2006 10:06:49 -0800 Dennis Allison
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Is there some performance test I can use to characterize the Zope system
itself so I can compare Zopes running on the two machines?
just some ideas:
- install Plone and run 'ab' against the front-page which will
17 matches
Mail list logo
