Hi
Have been looking into running a script which would export all the file
objects and folder structure of a site out onto an area on the filesystem.
This would be a management requirement as once a week they would like to
take a copy of all the assets separate from the ZODB.
This product looks
Hi
thinking along the lines of exporting file objects onto the filesystem
as their original file type so file system storage isn't quite right.
This type of issue must have come up before as it's a big managerial
concern to be able to extract all files from a site.
On 7/10/07, [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Hi
thinking along the lines of exporting file objects onto the filesystem
as their original file type so file system storage isn't quite right.
This type of issue must have come up before as it's a big managerial
concern to be able to extract all files from a site.
On 7/10/07, [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Dennis Allison wrote:
I am looking to map a portion of the local file system into Zope. One way
to do this is to use LocalFS, another is to use Ape.
What's the problem you're trying to solve? I suspect both Ape and
LocalFS are the wrong solution ;-)
Chris
--
Simplistix - Content
I am looking to map a portion of the local file system into Zope. One way
to do this is to use LocalFS, another is to use Ape. I am sure there are
onter approaches as well. We are using Zop 2.9.X. Will Ape work in this
context? What would you suggest?
On 11 Mar 2006, at 03:13, Dennis Allison wrote:
I am looking to map a portion of the local file system into Zope.
One way
to do this is to use LocalFS, another is to use Ape. I am sure
there are
onter approaches as well. We are using Zop 2.9.X. Will Ape work
in this
context? What
It seems APE 1.0 doesnt run out of the box with Zope 2.9 -- has anyone tried
hacking APE up so it can run inside Zope 2.9?
Any thoughts as to what would be necessary / how hard this would be?
Thanks,
peter.
___
Zope maillist - Zope@zope.org
Hi all,
I'm trying to use Ape (cvs version) with Zope 2.7 (cvs version) and
postgresql 7.4 on Debian Sarge pure64 in an AMD 64 box.Trying to
mount the ZODB mount point from ZMI I always obtain:
*Error Type: OverflowError*
*Error Value: requested number of bytes is more than a Python string
On Sun, 18 Apr 2004, Kapil Thangavelu wrote:
part of the reason i never used ape as a means for svn integration was
was that this imo, mix of high level application operations with zodb
storage level operations never seemed a proper fit as it required
bypassing the storage interface for
On Mon, 2004-04-19 at 13:33, Shane Hathaway wrote:
On Sun, 18 Apr 2004, Kapil Thangavelu wrote:
should we move this discussion to an ape specific mailing list?
I'm happy with zope-dev and zodb-dev, but if there's a good reason to make
a new list, that's fine.
its a knowledge discovery
On Wed, 2004-04-14 at 10:04, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Kapil,
Right now, the svn transactions are entirely contained within a single
fileops operation: for example a mkdir connects to a transaction root,
performs the necessary operations, and commits, all in one shot.
ok, thats what about
:)
-Original Message-
From: Kapil Thangavelu [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: April 14, 2004 6:49 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: Zope + Ape + Subversion (was: RE: [Zope-dev] Using a truely
r evis ion based storage for Zope ?)
On Tue, 2004-04-13 at 20:53
On Wed, 2004-04-14 at 19:14, Shane Hathaway wrote:
On Wed, 14 Apr 2004 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
My initial, uneducated thoughts on the topic were simplistic, but then I'm a
big K.I.S.S. fan: simply pickle the entire object back and forth as one
entity. This means for each object, there
To: Shane Hathaway
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: Zope + Ape + Subversion (was: RE: [Zope-dev] Using a truely
r evis ion based storage for Zope ?)
On Tue, 2004-04-13 at 22:46, Shane Hathaway wrote:
On Tue, 13 Apr 2004 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Thanks for the extra
On Thu, 2004-04-15 at 00:16, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Oh, a very good idea indeed! We'll have to look at that eventually.
The mechanism you describe is preferable, but it should be noted that
subversion properties are easily accessible using the clients.
So long as said properties are
On Wed, 2004-04-14 at 19:28, Shane Hathaway wrote:
In Subversion, is it possible to read/write a versioned object by unique
identifier rather than by path? If so, it's a great blessing and we don't
need a transaction script.
not really, yes every svn node has an a node id, but there is no
On Thu, 15 Apr 2004 20:40:09 -0400 (EDT)
Shane Hathaway [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Wed, 14 Apr 2004, Kapil Thangavelu wrote:
although i wonder if there is some hand waving in progress here that
i can't see. i guess my semantic notion of versions has been that of
long lived transactions,
On Thu, 15 Apr 2004 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
What happens is you write a new serializer, notably write a custom
serializer for an object type you've already been using for a while, using
the default one ? (Presumably because you WANT to be able to access the
contents from other tools)
I
On Wed, 14 Apr 2004, Kapil Thangavelu wrote:
although i wonder if there is some hand waving in progress here that i
can't see. i guess my semantic notion of versions has been that of long
lived transactions, and is there a better means of thinking of them? how
do they play across with
On Tue, 2004-04-13 at 20:53, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hello,
Hmmm, well it's as stable as Ape and Subversion are respectively :)
I wouldn't call it stable no, it's something I did over the long week-end we
just had, and that's about it :)
Ape is at 0.8 and therefore becoming quite
On Tue, 2004-04-13 at 22:46, Shane Hathaway wrote:
On Tue, 13 Apr 2004 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Thanks for the extra tips, I'll check out those interfaces! I'm also getting
up to speed on the whole mapper concept, where the work regarding properties
handling seems to be ?
Ape supports
On Tue, 2004-04-13 at 12:01, Shane Hathaway wrote:
On Tue, 13 Apr 2004, Kapil Thangavelu wrote:
since
objects modified in a version are in essence locked from participating
in other transactions, actions like modifying content in a version in a
cmf site amounts to locking the catalog
in Plone.
Thanks
Arthur
On Tue, 13 Apr 2004 04:06:26 -0400, Kapil Thangavelu wrote
On Mon, 2004-04-12 at 18:03, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
G'Day,
Well, step one is done ... I now have Zope + Ape using Subversion as it's
filesystem !!
cool!
This is step one because
On Wed, 14 Apr 2004 06:59:05 -0400
Kapil Thangavelu [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Tue, 2004-04-13 at 12:01, Shane Hathaway wrote:
On Tue, 13 Apr 2004, Kapil Thangavelu wrote:
since
objects modified in a version are in essence locked from
participating in other transactions, actions
On Wed, 14 Apr 2004 09:50:17 -0400
Casey Duncan [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
[..]
In practical terms this would mean that the versioned catalog would
need to keep track of the uids that had been cataloged, uncataloged
and reindexed in the version. The merge would mean cataloging,
uncataloging and
To: Shane Hathaway
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Zope + Ape + Subversion (was: RE: [Zope-dev] Using a truely
revis ion based storage for Zope ?)
On Tue, 2004-04-13 at 12:01, Shane Hathaway wrote:
On Tue, 13 Apr 2004, Kapil Thangavelu wrote:
since
objects modified
could be dropped/replaced with a
PropertyFileSystem implementation of some kind maybe ??
What do you think ?
J.F.
-Original Message-
From: Shane Hathaway [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: April 13, 2004 10:46 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: Zope + Ape + Subversion
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: April 14, 2004 6:51 AM
To: Shane Hathaway
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: Zope + Ape + Subversion (was: RE: [Zope-dev] Using a truely
r evis ion based storage for Zope ?)
On Tue, 2004-04-13 at 22:46, Shane Hathaway wrote:
On Tue, 13 Apr 2004 [EMAIL
On Wed, 14 Apr 2004 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
My initial, uneducated thoughts on the topic were simplistic, but then I'm a
big K.I.S.S. fan: simply pickle the entire object back and forth as one
entity. This means for each object, there is one file on the fs. The
benefit is greater
On Wed, 14 Apr 2004 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Right now the fs implementation stores script commands that are cummulated
upon connect() (I think?), validated as best as possible upon vote() and run
upon finish(). I don't see why this couldn't be adapted to SVN txn's ...
connect() = start a
On Wed, 14 Apr 2004 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Fact is if one wanted a client to interact with a svn repository that stores
zope objects, it would need to be fairly specifically designed for it ...
How would a client (Say dreamweaver with a subversion plug-in) know that
when editing an image,
PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: Zope + Ape + Subversion (was: RE: [Zope-dev] Using a truely
r evis ion based storage for Zope ?)
On Tue, 2004-04-13 at 20:53, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hello,
Hmmm, well it's as stable as Ape and Subversion are respectively :)
I wouldn't call it stable
: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 14/04/2004 7:39 PM
Subject: RE: Zope + Ape + Subversion (was: RE: [Zope-dev] Using a truely r
evis ion based storage for Zope ?)
On Wed, 14 Apr 2004 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Fact is if one wanted a client
On Mon, 2004-04-12 at 18:03, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
G'Day,
Well, step one is done ... I now have Zope + Ape using Subversion as it's
filesystem !!
cool!
This is step one because, as Shawn suggested (Thanks for the pointer, that's
what I needed!), this simply means that Zope uses SVN
.
Thanks
Arthur
On Tue, 13 Apr 2004 04:06:26 -0400, Kapil Thangavelu wrote
On Mon, 2004-04-12 at 18:03, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
G'Day,
Well, step one is done ... I now have Zope + Ape using Subversion as it's
filesystem !!
cool!
This is step one because, as Shawn suggested (Thanks
On 12 Apr 2004 at 18:03, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Anyways, I'm just rambling by now ... Comments, thoughts and constructive
criticism welcome !
This sounds wonderful!
Regarding versions. Perhap you can have a control panel setting that selects the
branch to publish by default. The ZMI
-
From: Arthur Chan Chi Chuen
To: Kapil Thangavelu; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 13/04/2004 2:13 PM
Subject: Re: Zope + Ape + Subversion (was: RE: [Zope-dev] Using a truely
revis ion based storage for Zope ?)
Hi all,
I've read your
PROTECTED]
Sent: 13/04/2004 8:40 AM
Subject: Re: Zope + Ape + Subversion (was: RE: [Zope-dev] Using a truely
revis ion based storage for Zope ?)
On 12 Apr 2004 at 18:03, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Anyways, I'm just rambling by now ... Comments, thoughts and
constructive
criticism welcome
PROTECTED]
Sent: 13/04/2004 11:43 AM
Subject: Re: Zope + Ape + Subversion (was: RE: [Zope-dev] Using a truely
revis ion based storage for Zope ?)
On Mon, 12 Apr 2004 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
This is step one because, as Shawn suggested (Thanks for the pointer,
that's
what I needed!), this simply
PROTECTED]
Sent: 13/04/2004 2:13 PM
Subject: Re: Zope + Ape + Subversion (was: RE: [Zope-dev] Using a truely
revis ion based storage for Zope ?)
Hi all,
I've read your discussion about version control, it seems a cool
thing you guys making good progress. Btw, can I ask is the Ape using
PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 13/04/2004 8:40 AM
Subject: Re: Zope + Ape + Subversion (was: RE: [Zope-dev] Using a truely
revis ion based storage for Zope ?)
On 12 Apr 2004 at 18:03, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Anyways, I'm just rambling by now ... Comments, thoughts and
constructive
On Tue, 13 Apr 2004 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Thanks for the extra tips, I'll check out those interfaces! I'm also getting
up to speed on the whole mapper concept, where the work regarding properties
handling seems to be ?
Ape supports both annotations and Zope properties. Annotations are
G'Day,
Well, step one is done ... I now have Zope + Ape using Subversion as it's
filesystem !!
This is step one because, as Shawn suggested (Thanks for the pointer, that's
what I needed!), this simply means that Zope uses SVN purely as a
filesystem.
Because of subversion's nature, I want
On Mon, 12 Apr 2004 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Well, step one is done ... I now have Zope + Ape using Subversion as it's
filesystem !!
That's fantastic!
I'll write a more detailed reply soon. :-)
Shane
___
Zope-Dev maillist - [EMAIL PROTECTED
44 matches
Mail list logo
