-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Dieter Maurer wrote:
Florent Guillaume wrote at 2005-9-5 16:49 +0200:
...
It is just that the CMF is unable to fix a year long bug
It's not CMF's fault, it's only the responsibility of Windows developers
running CMF. I for one couldn't care
Hi Dieter,
Dieter Maurer wrote:
I am setting up sites using Plone and am concerned to read some of the
comments on it. Is it really that bad performance wise?
No, it is not.
...I agree, if it is correctly set up and optimised, which isn't the
case if someone is here complaining about
michael nt milne wrote:
I am setting up sites using Plone and am concerned to read some of the
comments on it. Is it really that bad performance wise?
it depends, unless you have a lot of experience with it, Zope and CMF,
you might well find yourself with a slow site on your hands and not
Dieter Maurer wrote:
I am setting up sites using Plone and am concerned to read some of the
comments on it. Is it really that bad performance wise?
No, it is not.
It is just that the CMF is unable to fix a year long bug
It's not CMF's fault, it's only the responsibility of Windows
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Florent Guillaume wrote:
Dieter Maurer wrote:
I am setting up sites using Plone and am concerned to read some of the
comments on it. Is it really that bad performance wise?
No, it is not.
It is just that the CMF is unable to fix a year long
Florent Guillaume wrote at 2005-9-5 16:49 +0200:
...
It is just that the CMF is unable to fix a year long bug
It's not CMF's fault, it's only the responsibility of Windows developers
running CMF. I for one couldn't care less.
Really?
That the CMF makes an hierarchical filesystem scan for
Chris has opinions on performance based on his experiences. Others have
different viewpoints. Here is an more empirical treatment of what you
might expect:
http://www.ifpeople.net/resources/downloads/PlonePerformance.pdf
--Paul
michael nt milne wrote:
Hi
I am setting up sites using
Chris Withers wrote:
Andrew Sawyers wrote:
Did Matt indicate if he was running multiple zeo app servers? It
might help
to be spreading the load. 1, writes a day is not outrageous
Yes, but he's using Plone, which implies not only all of the CMF
reindexing overhead, but also all
Hi
I am setting up sites using Plone and am concerned to read some of the
comments on it. Is it really that bad performance wise? I'm using
CMFMember also-why is it 'apalling'?
On 9/2/05, N.Davis [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Chris Withers wrote:
Andrew Sawyers wrote:
Did Matt indicate if he
michael nt milne wrote at 2005-9-2 09:13 -0400:
I am setting up sites using Plone and am concerned to read some of the
comments on it. Is it really that bad performance wise?
No, it is not.
It is just that the CMF is unable to fix a year long bug
which affects Windows only when Zope is run in
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Kennamore, Matthew G [NTK] wrote:
Here is our situation, we originally launched zope with a small user
base in mind and like most IT implementations it got away from us
quickly and we have over 1000 users now. We are experiencing huge
slowdowns
11 matches
Mail list logo
