En/na Jens Vagelpohl ha escrit:
The only issues you might ever run into would be problems with the
Python that comes with the OS. But then again if you run Zope in
production you should never ever use the system Python and build your
own instead. The system Python tends to be compiled with
Can I humbly recommend that you don't reinvent
the wheel and have a look at
www.issuetrackerproduct.com
It's really good for QA and general problem reporting.
Thanks, I'll take a look at it right away. :)
Regards,
Harald
___
Zope maillist -
On 28 Oct 2005, at 08:03, Einar Næss Jensen wrote:
doesn't seem to cause any trouble. So it stays. Just to remind me
never to use redhat or rpms.
How the bad RPMs you used make you blame RedHat as a whole isn't a
jump I can follow... you should be blaming those people who packages
the
HaraldFinnås wrote:
(snip)
and I plan on writing a simple application for tracking
Non-Conformaties, Incident Reports etc (QA related).
Have you tried Trac ?
--
bruno desthuilliers
développeur
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.modulix.com
___
Zope
bruno desthuilliers [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote
on 28.10.2005 11:09:00:
Have you tried Trac ?
No, but now I will. It's listed as software
development tracking so I've ignored it. :)
Regards,
Harald
___
Zope maillist - Zope@zope.org
On 28 Oct 2005, at 10:26, Einar Næss Jensen wrote:
How the bad RPMs you used make you blame RedHat as a whole isn't a
jump I can follow... you should be blaming those people who packages
the RPMs and not the whole distribution.
I'm sure Redhat works fine for many people in a lot of
On 10/28/05, Jens Vagelpohl [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 28 Oct 2005, at 10:26, Einar Næss Jensen wrote:Debian is a great distribution, no doubt, but X works for us while Ydoes not is a misleading statement that creates wrong impressions.It's not RedHat's fault that you weren't up to speed on some
Am Freitag, 28. Oktober 2005 11:33 schrieb HaraldFinnås:
bruno desthuilliers [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote on 28.10.2005 11:09:00:
Have you tried Trac ?
No, but now I will. It's listed as software development tracking so I've
ignored it. :)
you also might want to take a look at roundup
On 10/27/05, HaraldFinnås [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Depends on what you are going to use it for. So, tell us! :-)
Not sure myself yet. :) There will certainly be a couple of Plone sites, and
I plan on writing a simple application for tracking Non-Conformaties,
Incident Reports etc (QA
On 26 Oct 2005, at 21:43, HaraldFinnås wrote:
I've also seen comments that running Zope on RHEL/CentOS might not
be wise. My test env. is using FC4, but I'm planning to install
CenOS 4.2 on the production server. Unwise choice?
I'd be curious to find out who says something like that. It's
Jens Vagelpohl wrote:
On 26 Oct 2005, at 21:43, HaraldFinnås wrote:
I've also seen comments that running Zope on RHEL/CentOS might not
be wise. My test env. is using FC4, but I'm planning to install
CenOS 4.2 on the production server. Unwise choice?
I'd be curious to find out who says
On 27 Oct 2005, at 08:58, Dario Lopez-Kästen wrote:
well, on larger shops like ours, the sysadms always want to know
why we introduce Yet Another Non-Standard Component to the system
setup that cannot be RPM'ed like the rest. And I am not talking
across pythoin versions, but oin the same
On 10/26/05, HaraldFinnås [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I'm new to Zope, and I've been playing with 2.8.1, but I really haven't done
any real work with it yet. Now I expect to get my new decicated Zope
hardware tomorrow, so I have to decide if I should go for 2.8.4 or 3.1.0.
Any tips if I should
Depends on what you are going to use it for.
So, tell us! :-)
Not sure myself yet. :) There will certainly be a
couple of Plone sites, and I plan on writing a simple application for tracking
Non-Conformaties, Incident Reports etc (QA related).
But based on the responses until now, I've already
Am Donnerstag, 27. Oktober 2005 09:37 schrieb Jens Vagelpohl:
The only issues you might ever run into would be problems with the
Python that comes with the OS. But then again if you run Zope in
production you should never ever use the system Python and build your
own instead. The system
On 27 Oct 2005, at 10:22, Sascha Ottolski wrote:
Am Donnerstag, 27. Oktober 2005 09:37 schrieb Jens Vagelpohl:
The only issues you might ever run into would be problems with the
Python that comes with the OS. But then again if you run Zope in
production you should never ever use the system
Am Donnerstag, 27. Oktober 2005 13:20 schrieb Jens Vagelpohl:
You just noted one more disadvantage yourself: The system Python is
likely to be out of step with what Zope wants. Furthermore, updates
to the system Python or to add-on packages might have unintended
consequences for your
On 27 Oct 2005, at 12:55, Sascha Ottolski wrote:
Am Donnerstag, 27. Oktober 2005 13:20 schrieb Jens Vagelpohl:
You just noted one more disadvantage yourself: The system Python is
likely to be out of step with what Zope wants. Furthermore, updates
to the system Python or to add-on packages
Am Donnerstag, 27. Oktober 2005 14:17 schrieb Jens Vagelpohl:
well, might have is one thing, really experiencing problems is quite
different...
Look, it's all about how much risk you are willing to carry. I don't
like playing Russian Roulette with services that are supposed to be
highly
On 27 Oct 2005, at 13:30, Sascha Ottolski wrote:
Look, it's all about how much risk you are willing to carry. I don't
like playing Russian Roulette with services that are supposed to be
highly available. And I don't want to have to waste a single thought
on problems that *might* develop if
On 10/27/05, HaraldFinnås [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Depends on what you are going to use it for. So, tell us! :-)
Not sure myself yet. :) There will certainly be a couple of Plone sites
Well, Plone doesn't run on Zope 3, so there ya go. :)
--
Lennart Regebro, Nuxeo http://www.nuxeo.com/
On Thu, Oct 27, 2005, Jens Vagelpohl wrote:
On 27 Oct 2005, at 08:58, Dario Lopez-Kästen wrote:
well, on larger shops like ours, the sysadms always want to know
why we introduce Yet Another Non-Standard Component to the system
setup that cannot be RPM'ed like the rest. And I am not talking
I'm new to Zope, and I've been playing
with 2.8.1, but I really haven't done any real work with it yet. Now I
expect to get my new decicated Zope hardware tomorrow, so I have to decide
if I should go for 2.8.4 or 3.1.0. Any tips if I should go for the latest
and greatest or stick with 2.8?
I've
you need ... some CMF things aren't avilable in it
yet.
J.F.
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of HaraldFinnåsSent:
October 26, 2005 4:43 PMTo: zope@zope.orgSubject: [Zope]
Zope 2.8 or 3.1?
I'm new to Zope, and I've been
playing with 2.8.1, but I really haven't done
Doyon, Jean-Francois [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote on 26.10.2005 22:40:09:
I'm using Zope 2.7.x on RHEL 3.x without trouble ... Though I should
be upgrading to CentOS 4.x fairly soon ... what problems have you
heard of?
I think the problems were related to OS software versions
like Python. And most
pretty straight-forward mind
you.
J.F.
From: HaraldFinnås
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: October 26, 2005 4:55
PMTo: zope@zope.orgCc: Doyon,
Jean-FrancoisSubject: RE: [Zope] Zope 2.8 or
3.1?
"Doyon, Jean-Francois"
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote on 26.10.2005
22:40:09: I'm using
To: zope@zope.org
Subject: [Zope] Zope 2.8 or 3.1?
I'm new to Zope, and I've been playing with 2.8.1, but
I really haven't done any real work with it yet. Now I expect to get my new
decicated Zope hardware tomorrow, so I have to decide if I should go for 2.8.4
or 3.1.0. Any tips if I should go
PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Doyon, Jean-Francois
Sent: Wednesday, October 26, 2005
4:40 PM
To: 'HaraldFinnås'; zope@zope.org
Subject: RE: [Zope] Zope 2.8 or
3.1?
I'm using Zope 2.7.x on RHEL 3.x without
trouble ... Though I should be upgrading to CentOS 4.x fairly soon ... what
28 matches
Mail list logo
