Chris Withers wrote:
Nicolas Georgakopoulos wrote:
I don't have any experience writing external products... should be
easy if I finish the python programming part as a simple traditional
python release and then to implement it as a Zope product ?
Yeah, sure be easy enough... and we're to
Chris Withers napisał(a):
Pawel Lewicki wrote:
Any clues?
Products used:
- ExternalFile 1.2.0
- CMFExternalFile 0.5
- Plone 2.0.5
None of these are products I'd trust. Use a ZODB analysis tool to find
out the types of objects you have in your database and see which product
is causing the
I'm running Zope 2.8.1-final, python 2.3.5, linux2 and Zope 2.6.1 python
2.1.3, linux2 on the same server so I don't see why you cant' also run Zope
2.9. More than likely each of your configurations have the same path to the
lock file. Edit zopefolder/etc/zope.conf where zopefolder is the
On Thursday 23 February 2006 06:53, Lennart Regebro wrote:
Ah, not in Zope 2.9 it seems. Is this expected, or an I doing something
wrong? I'm running the Five tests with bin/zopectl test --dir Products/Five
as usual, and having a set_trace() in the doctests behaves exactly as with
the old test
On Thursday 23 February 2006 08:13, Lennart Regebro wrote:
As you see, I can't even step into that next line. And even if I
could, the necessity of having to step through the doctestrunning
would be a major pain in the ass.
Ok, I have never needed this. And I can see why it does not work.
I was assuming that it would somehow be easy to do the equivalent to
Javascript escape/unescape functions in a Python script but for some
reason I just can't find out how to do it.
Maybe I can't see the forest for the trees. Anybody out there have a
cluestick to whack me with?
- Original Message -
From: Brian Sullivan [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: zope list user zope@zope.org
Sent: Thursday, February 23, 2006 10:45 AM
Subject: [Zope] Python equivalent to Javascript escape/unescape
I was assuming that it would somehow be easy to do the equivalent to
Javascript
I was assuming that it would somehow be easy to do the equivalent to
Javascript escape/unescape functions in a Python script but for some
reason I just can't find out how to do it.
Maybe I can't see the forest for the trees. Anybody out there have a
cluestick to whack me with?
Try
On 2/23/06, Brian Sullivan [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I was assuming that it would somehow be easy to do the equivalent to
Javascript escape/unescape functions in a Python script but for some
reason I just can't find out how to do it.
from Products.PythonScripts.standard import url_quote,
Title: RESOLUTION: Can Zope 2.9 Coexist With Zope 2.6 Using Different Ports?
Thanks for the help everyone. I needed to make the $Instance/var and $Instance/log directories readable and writable to the user that Zope 2.9 ran as. Once I did that the problem went away.
On 2/23/06, Gary Poster [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
You effectively can't step through all the tests (with a single
pdb). You can step through a single line in the test well. While it
sounds limiting, that has proved quite sufficient for me in
practice. YMMV, of course.
Sigh. doctests really
Chris,
On Tue, Jan 31, 2006 at 01:36:36PM +, Chris Withers wrote:
| ZEO Stepper
Is ZEO required to use Stepper?
| Or if you don't like Stepper, then zopectl run...
Does 'zopectl run' require exclusive access to the database? (IOW
must the zope server be stopped before zopectl run can
On Thu, Feb 23, 2006 at 11:27:59AM -0500, Derrick Hudson wrote:
Does 'zopectl run' require exclusive access to the database? (IOW
must the zope server be stopped before zopectl run can be used?)
Yes, IFF you are not running zeo.
That's another useful reason to use zeo :-)
I just came
I dunno about sucking because they are quite good for documentation,
but I tend to write plain-old unittests instead of doctests when I'm
testing without any pretense towards writing documentation. If you
test internals of a class in a doctest, the doctest body gets pretty
cluttered,
On 2/23/06, Chris McDonough [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I dunno about sucking because they are quite good for documentation,
Oh, absolutely.
but I tend to write plain-old unittests instead of doctests when I'm
testing without any pretense towards writing documentation.
Exactly my sentiments.
On Feb 23, 2006, at 1:17 PM, Benji York wrote:
Chris McDonough wrote:
I dunno about sucking because they are quite good for
documentation, but I tend to write plain-old unittests instead of
doctests when I'm testing without any pretense towards writing
documentation. If you test
On Feb 23, 2006, at 1:57 PM, Benji York wrote:
But it's of course a judgment call.
Perhaps this is just one of those to-each-his-own things. shrug
My own are doctests. ;)
Sure. I actually really appreciate reading good doctests, they help
a lot, and they beat not having any docs at all
On Tue January 31 2006 07:47, Chris Withers wrote:
I do it though the webinterface with a wget from the crontab:
Oh, ouch ouch bad fragile pain failure suffering...
URL whacking is evil and must be punished...
How is this different than clicking on the Pack button in the ZMI? What's
the
On Thursday 23 February 2006 13:37, Lennart Regebro wrote:
Not to mention, doctests are not debuggable from WingIDE.
Maybe we should have a WingIDE sprint in Boston at some point. This would be a
good topic.
Regards,
Stephan
--
Stephan Richter
CBU Physics Chemistry (B.S.) / Tufts Physics
On Thursday 23 February 2006 14:16, Chris McDonough wrote:
(e.g. high-
level overview of purpose, how to install it, what other packages it
depends upon, which versions of Python/Zope it works with, who is
responsible for maintaining the package, where to report bugs, and so
on). I
On Feb 23, 2006, at 4:51 PM, Stephan Richter wrote:
So, I take it that you are a second voter in favor of not requiring
all tests
to be doctests.
If the ZSCP thing takes off, I think test/doc req'ts should be
somewhat looser than mandating a particular test/doc framework
(something along
On Thursday 23 February 2006 20:29, Jim Fulton wrote:
This is quite a document and vision. I hope we can pull something
like it off. (Like many, I recognize the daunting size of the task.)
I have already working parsers and writers for all file formats. I have also a
preliminary (but tested)
Thanks for that. It worked perfectly.
Out of interest, why am I unable to access the method from with my Zope
python code? What is a private object, and why is it private?
Thanks,
Nick
Martijn Pieters wrote:
On 2/19/06, Nicholas Watmough [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I tried using
Hello,
I have been using the Structured Document (SD) product with page
templates (to provide some content sections that a client can edit
using structured text).
Now I would like to use ReStructuredText Document (RSTD) instead of SD.
I have been using code like this in a page template to
Log message for revision 41768:
Branch for deprecating Zope 2 interfaces.
Changed:
A Zope/branches/philikon-deprecate-interfaces/
-=-
Copied: Zope/branches/philikon-deprecate-interfaces (from rev 41767, Zope/trunk)
___
Zope-Checkins maillist
1. why the 3 posts?
2. Why on [EMAIL PROTECTED] This should be on zope@zope.org
Jürgen Herrmann wrote:
hi all!
i have a class ImageContainer in a python product, that has an ImageFile
attached, it's named 1.gif:
...
image = ImageFile('1.gif', '/some/where')
setattr(self.__class__,
Philipp von Weitershausen wrote:
That's a bold assumption.
It's a bold assumption based on the fact that I'm pretty sure there's
about 1 person on the planet who's ever used that code. I believe his
name's Andreas. I might be wrong of course, but I don't think it's much
more than that...
On Thu, February 23, 2006 09:02, Chris Withers wrote:
1. why the 3 posts?
sorry, there was a long delay before my messages appeared, so i thought
i had problems with my subscription. sorry for the triple post!
2. Why on [EMAIL PROTECTED] This should be on zope@zope.org
well, actually i have a
Chris Withers wrote:
Philipp von Weitershausen wrote:
That's a bold assumption.
It's a bold assumption based on the fact that I'm pretty sure there's
about 1 person on the planet who's ever used that code. I believe his
name's Andreas. I might be wrong of course, but I don't think it's much
On Thursday 23 February 2006 20:29, Jim Fulton wrote:
This is quite a document and vision. I hope we can pull something
like it off. (Like many, I recognize the daunting size of the task.)
I have already working parsers and writers for all file formats. I have also a
preliminary (but tested)
On 23 Feb 2006, at 08:29, Wichert Akkerman wrote:
Hi,
Starting from 2.5 Plone will use PAS, and Plone 2.5-alpha2 is about to
hit the streets. For a release we would like to use released
versions of
all products used, which includes PluggableAuthService and
PluginRegistry.
The latest PAS
On 23 Feb 2006, at 12:16, Tres Seaver wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Wichert Akkerman wrote:
Hi,
Starting from 2.5 Plone will use PAS, and Plone 2.5-alpha2 is
about to
hit the streets. For a release we would like to use released
versions of
all products used,
Previously Jens Vagelpohl wrote:
I'm traveling for the rest of the day and can only commit to cutting
a release on Saturday if that's OK.
I'll take whatever I can get :). If you can cut PluginRegistry and
PAS releases on Saturday that will certainly work for us. If you can
drop me an email
How can I access a Psycopg_database_connection within a python script.
So far I have this which only returns a connection instance, but I want
to pass the connection a query string.
query1=context.Psycopg_database_connection('select * from studentdetails')
return query1
Regards
Garry
34 matches
Mail list logo
