Summary of messages to the zope-tests list.
Period Wed Jul 2 11:00:00 2008 UTC to Thu Jul 3 11:00:00 2008 UTC.
There were 5 messages: 5 from Zope Tests.
Tests passed OK
---
Subject: OK : Zope-2.8 Python-2.3.6 : Linux
From: Zope Tests
Date: Wed Jul 2 20:53:47 EDT 2008
URL:
Hi,
I've checked in a branch with changes to the testbrowser.real code to
make it work with mozlab 0.1.9 (and firefox 3).
Could someone please review the code and inform me, if I can merge it
with the trunk?
The branch can be found at
On Thu, Jul 3, 2008 at 8:15 AM, Sebastian Wehrmann [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi,
I've checked in a branch with changes to the testbrowser.real code to
make it work with mozlab 0.1.9 (and firefox 3).
Cool.
Could someone please review the code and inform me, if I can merge it
with the trunk?
I'm working on making the zope.testing test runner run tests in
parallelized subprocesses. The option will likely be spelled -j N,
where N is the maximum number of processes.
I have it basically working, but have noticed a couple odd corners of
the test runner that I'd like to clean up. They
On Thu, 2008-07-03 at 17:22 -0400, Benji York wrote:
I'm working on making the zope.testing test runner run tests in
parallelized subprocesses. The option will likely be spelled -j N,
where N is the maximum number of processes.
I have it basically working, but have noticed a couple odd
Hi Benji
Betreff: [Zope-dev] Test runner: layers, subprocesses, and tear down
[... ]
#2 will add some process start-up overhead, but it'll only be
one more process than is already started (and any
reasonably-sized test corpus already starts several processes
for each test run). The one
On Thu, Jul 3, 2008 at 5:37 PM, Christian Theune [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Thu, 2008-07-03 at 17:22 -0400, Benji York wrote:
I'd like to 1) remove the layer tear-down mechanism entirely, and 2)
make (almost) all layers run in a subprocess.
I want to do #1 because it would simplify the test
On Thu, Jul 03, 2008 at 05:22:11PM -0400, Benji York wrote:
I'm working on making the zope.testing test runner run tests in
parallelized subprocesses. The option will likely be spelled -j N,
where N is the maximum number of processes.
That's wonderful news!
I have it basically working, but
Recently I migrated a large-ish app built on Zope 3.2 to Zope 3.4.
(About time I hear someone mumbling in the audience.) One strange
difference was that TALES iterators swapped the meaning of odd and even,
i.e.
p tal:repeat=item python: [1, 2, 3, 4]
span
On Tue, Jun 24, 2008 at 01:39:28PM +0200, Christian Theune wrote:
I have a problem with the standard item traverser provided by
zope.app.container:
The item traverser looks up a object using the given name and a __getitem__
call on the context. If this raises a KeyError it tries to look up a
I've checked in a branch with changes to the testbrowser.real code to
make it work with mozlab 0.1.9 (and firefox 3).
Hi Sebastian,
This is great. I spent all day yesterday trying to make this happen
and didn't get anywhere. Sometimes I wake up with a better idea as to
how to solve things,
Benji York wrote:
I'm working on making the zope.testing test runner run tests in
parallelized subprocesses.
I have some recent experience parallelising (and distributing across
machines) test runs. This was in Java, with TestNG and Selenium, but we
learned some interesting things. We
On Fri, 2008-07-04 at 02:10 +0300, Marius Gedminas wrote:
On Tue, Jun 24, 2008 at 01:39:28PM +0200, Christian Theune wrote:
[...]
I can explicitly make the URL use '@@viewname' and bypass the item
traverser,
but I don't like the @@s in the URL. I wonder whether adding Unauthorized to
After implementing the Ingres adapter ZEIngresDA I found I was left
high and dry when it came to deprecation messages and all else by
ZEOmega. I had to fix it myself.
- Original Message -
From: Jeff Peterson [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Saturday, June 28, 2008 3:24
Subject: RE: [Zope]
from cStringIO import StringIO
def workflowscripts2methods(self):
out = StringIO()
print out, Star converting workflow scripts into External Methods
pw = self.portal_workflow
for workflow in pw.objectValues('Workflow'):
for container in workflow.objectValues('Workflow
--On 3. Juli 2008 15:41:52 +0100 Peter Bengtsson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I'm getting an AssertionError on this!!!
After having used objectValues() for so many many years without much
trouble my confidence in it just dropped.
After years of Zope, you know that we need a full traceback :-)
2008/7/3 Andreas Jung [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
--On 3. Juli 2008 15:41:52 +0100 Peter Bengtsson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I'm getting an AssertionError on this!!!
After having used objectValues() for so many many years without much
trouble my confidence in it just dropped.
After years of Zope,
+---[ Peter Bengtsson ]--
| 2008/7/3 Andreas Jung [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
|
|
| --On 3. Juli 2008 15:41:52 +0100 Peter Bengtsson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
|
| I'm getting an AssertionError on this!!!
| After having used objectValues() for so many many years without much
|
2008/7/3 Andrew Milton [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
+---[ Peter Bengtsson ]--
| 2008/7/3 Andreas Jung [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
|
|
| --On 3. Juli 2008 15:41:52 +0100 Peter Bengtsson [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
|
| I'm getting an AssertionError on this!!!
| After having used
--On 3. Juli 2008 16:01:53 +0100 Peter Bengtsson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
2008/7/3 Andreas Jung [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
--On 3. Juli 2008 15:41:52 +0100 Peter Bengtsson [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
I'm getting an AssertionError on this!!!
After having used objectValues() for so many many years
+---[ Peter Bengtsson ]--
| 2008/7/3 Andrew Milton [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
| +---[ Peter Bengtsson ]--
| | 2008/7/3 Andreas Jung [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
| |
| |
| | --On 3. Juli 2008 15:41:52 +0100 Peter Bengtsson [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
| |
| |
2008/7/3 Andrew Milton [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
+---[ Peter Bengtsson ]--
| 2008/7/3 Andrew Milton [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
| +---[ Peter Bengtsson ]--
| | 2008/7/3 Andreas Jung [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
| |
| |
| | --On 3. Juli 2008 15:41:52 +0100 Peter
Following a hard disk crash 2 weeks ago we have installed Zope onto a new
server and all was fine until yesterday morning when Zope stopped responding
and required a restart to get it working. It did the same at 3-30pm today.
We are using Zope 2.9.0 on Centos 5.1 on a quad Zeon server with 4gb.
Have you tried looking at it with the deadlock debugger? That should
give you an idea of what its actually running (and if the deadlock
debugger is usually responsive even when zope isn't and if it isn't
that's also information).
Kevin
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Yes, couldn't agree more with kevin. DeadlockDebugger is crucial. It
won't change anything other than that you'll have information about
what really needs to change.
As an intermediate solution you can start to increase the number of
Zope threads from 4 to 6 or 8 and see if that kills the CPU of
I was same problems with new IBM hardware 2 yrs ago and etc at past. Wait,
please, your HW will be good after 2..3 months - it needs burning process.
It is known problem with very fresh silicon chips about diffusion of
non-homogenities - look at mfg date at asphalt squares. But my english is
My experience is that increasing the number of threads past 4 does
absolutely nothing to assist performance. Multi threads will help with
the occasional long running request, but if its more than occasional
then the thread list will eventually clog up no matter how many threads
you have (and the
Hi, I does not agree with You, because my servers runs with 20..150 threads,
because lower number of threads makes for somebody infinity waiting and Zope
under load responding very slow (with external database access). After
increasing threads, response under load is more quickly and more
Hi everyone.
I am migrating my web application to a new server and I am trying to
configure Zope + Apache as described in
http://wiki.zope.org/zope2/ZopeAndApache .
I previously used fast-cgi to communicate Apache with Zope and it worked
just fine. I use exUserFolder to store my users in a
Andreas Jung wrote at 2008-7-1 08:31 +0200:
...
My plone instance doesn't log user names into the Z2.log access log
file. Instead I always get user names as Anonymous. Is there any
setting that I need to change to get the user name correctly?
I am on the following versions of Plone/Zope:
*
Peter Bengtsson wrote at 2008-7-1 12:15 +0100:
...
The owner of the executing script is defined outside the context of
the object being accessed. The script has proxy roles, but they do not
apply in this context.. Access to 'workflow' of
(Products.DCWorkflow.Expression.StateChangeInfo instance at
31 matches
Mail list logo
