"Karl G. Ulbrich" cogently stated:
> If the goal is mail-in content, I'm not sure I understand IMAP to be
> anything approaching what you want: IMAP doesn't ACCEPT messages,
> at least not any of the IMAP servers I've seen, it serves messages
> up to clients (one of which could be Zope, like Wor
Quoting Stuart 'Zen' Bishop ([EMAIL PROTECTED]):
...
> you could expose an IMAP folder as Zope objects. You then never have
> to worry about transporting them into Zope, as they will just magically
> be available.
I like this -- keep the mail store separate and you never have to worry
if Zope can
On Wed, 31 May 2000, Steve Alexander wrote:
> > If the goal is mail-in content, I'm not sure I understand IMAP to be
> > anything approaching what you want: IMAP doesn't ACCEPT messages,
> > at least not any of the IMAP servers I've seen, it serves messages
> > up to clients (one of which could
"Karl G. Ulbrich" wrote:
>
> > > Yup, this sounds like mail-in content to me, which is what I'm after :-)
>
> If the goal is mail-in content, I'm not sure I understand IMAP to be
> anything approaching what you want: IMAP doesn't ACCEPT messages,
> at least not any of the IMAP servers I've seen
> > Yup, this sounds like mail-in content to me, which is what I'm after :-)
If the goal is mail-in content, I'm not sure I understand IMAP to be
anything approaching what you want: IMAP doesn't ACCEPT messages,
at least not any of the IMAP servers I've seen, it serves messages
up to clients (on
Chris Withers wrote:
> Which raises the question: What MTA would you use for a Zope IMAP server
> and does it matter? Again, forgive me if that's a stupid question ;-)
I would personally use exim, but I don't think it matters, if zope knows
intelligent things about it's users. If you wanted to
Chris Withers wrote:
>
> mindlace wrote:
> > I don't quite see why MailHost isn't "low level integration"
>
> Does MailHost do recieves as well as sends?
No, but see below...
> > Making Zope an MTA seems like a lot of extra work. Now, Zope as an IMAP
> > server I could get my head around...
>
ethan mindlace fremen wrote:
> An imap server stores the messages that have been recieved. An MTA
> (Mail Transport Agent) goes about sending mail from one place to
> another. If there were an IMAP server in zope, you could "recieve" the
> mail as an object in zope, but it would still be deliver
mindlace wrote:
> I don't quite see why MailHost isn't "low level integration"
Does MailHost do recieves as well as sends?
> > My dream would be for Zope to pipe an email address to a specific
> > object/method without the need for any external mail servers or
> > scripts...
>
> Making Zope an
"Dan L. Pierson" wrote:
> It has been noted a number of times that the current MailHost can and
> should be replaced with one based on the standard smtplib module. A
> patch is available somewhere and it's rumored to be in Zope 2.2.
It is in 2.2 :-)
> > My dream would be for Zope to pipe an em
-Original Message-
From: Karl Ulbrich <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: vrijdag 26 mei 2000 21:49
Subject: Re: [Zope] Zope Email (syndication)
>> Well... I think that it's probably the shortest route to a functioning
>>
> Well... I think that it's probably the shortest route to a functioning
> zope archive to use mailman- already written in python, and modular
> enough that we should be able to take it one step at a time.
In browsing the MailMan lists, I recall reading about someone
setting up an archiver scri
Chris Withers wrote:
> Check out:
> http://www.zope.org/Members/mindlace/MailZopeMan
>
> I like these ideas a lot, but I'd prefer to see the low-level email
> integration done seperately, so it can be used for other things.
I don't quite see why MailHost isn't "low level integration"
> My dream
Chris Withers writes:
> I like these ideas a lot, but I'd prefer to see the low-level email
> integration done seperately, so it can be used for other things.
What do you mean by low-level email integration? If you mean actual
SMTP server stuff, I think this is a bad idea for two reasons:
perf
"Dan L. Pierson" wrote:
> The perfect solution involves a mailing list server integrated with
> Zope, e.g. ZMailman. This would probably also provide mailing list
> archives integrated with Zope and ZCatalog and easy integration of
> mailing list and PTK/Squishdot discussion traffic. This has be
Kevin Dangoor writes:
> - Original Message -
> From: "Chris Withers" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: "Kevin Dangoor" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Cc: "Zope Mailing List" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Sent: Thursday, May 25, 2000 12:43 PM
- Original Message -
From: "Chris Withers" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Kevin Dangoor" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Cc: "Zope Mailing List" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Thursday, May 25, 2000 12:43 PM
Subject: Re: [Zope] Zope Email (syndication)
> I th
Kevin Dangoor wrote:
> I hadn't seen this one before. Since Zope is getting a Membership component,
> I think we'll need a good, solid way to send great big bunches of email to
> Members. I'm not sure if you've thought about this aspect or not. I believe
> it is a different function with different
- Original Message -
From: "Chris Withers" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Webmaster" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Cc: "Zope Mailing List" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Thursday, May 25, 2000 11:22 AM
Subject: Re: [Zope] syndication??
> http://www.zope.org/Members/chrisw/ZopeEmail/FrontPage
I hadn't seen t
19 matches
Mail list logo
