Re: [Zope-CMF] [dev] CMF 2.2 plans?

2009-03-04 Thread yuppie
Hi! Hanno Schlichting wrote: yuppie wrote: That would mean that CMFDefault-the-example-application will depend on z3c.form. If we are going to split off the forms we need to split off all browser views and the profiles that use these views. Something like 'cmf.app' that includes all the

Re: [Zope-CMF] [dev] CMF 2.2 plans?

2009-03-04 Thread yuppie
Hi! Charlie Clark wrote: Am 02.03.2009 um 19:27 schrieb yuppie: This is on my todo list, but I still have to write a proposal. Hmm, I don't recall the issue here. There wasn't much discussion about this. Some time ago Dieter asked for grouping support:

Re: [Zope-CMF] [dev] CMF 2.2 plans?

2009-03-02 Thread yuppie
Hi! Martin Aspeli wrote: Jens Vagelpohl wrote: I'll look at CMFCore and CMFDefault over the next few days (I'm traveling). Are there any code changes that you still need or is the current trunk state ready to be released from your point of view? I haven't looked into it in great

Re: [Zope-CMF] [dev] CMF 2.2 plans?

2009-03-02 Thread Jens Vagelpohl
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On Mar 2, 2009, at 11:30 , Hanno Schlichting wrote: yuppie wrote: 2.) get rid of redundant type info properties - See http://mail.zope.org/pipermail/zope-cmf/2009-January/028059.html Unfortunately

Re: [Zope-CMF] [dev] CMF 2.2 plans?

2009-03-02 Thread Tres Seaver
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 yuppie wrote: Hi! Martin Aspeli wrote: Jens Vagelpohl wrote: I'll look at CMFCore and CMFDefault over the next few days (I'm traveling). Are there any code changes that you still need or is the current trunk state ready to be released

Re: [Zope-CMF] [dev] CMF 2.2 plans?

2009-03-02 Thread yuppie
Hi! Tres Seaver wrote: yuppie wrote: 1.) look up add view actions in a different way --- The current implementation is not flexible enough. There is no way to sort or group these actions. This is on my todo list, but I still have to write a

Re: [Zope-CMF] [dev] CMF 2.2 plans?

2009-03-02 Thread Hanno Schlichting
yuppie wrote: That would mean that CMFDefault-the-example-application will depend on z3c.form. If we are going to split off the forms we need to split off all browser views and the profiles that use these views. Something like 'cmf.app' that includes all the CMFDefault stuff Plone doesn't

Re: [Zope-CMF] [dev] CMF 2.2 plans?

2009-03-02 Thread Charlie Clark
Am 02.03.2009 um 19:27 schrieb yuppie: This is on my todo list, but I still have to write a proposal. Hmm, I don't recall the issue here. There wasn't much discussion about this. Some time ago Dieter asked for grouping support:

Re: [Zope-CMF] [dev] CMF 2.2 plans?

2009-03-02 Thread Charlie Clark
Am 02.03.2009 um 19:46 schrieb Hanno Schlichting: This can happen in two ways, though. Either move the example- application bits into a different package or move the reusable bits into one. If you are really interested in doing this work, I'd be happy to figure out what parts of

Re: [Zope-CMF] [dev] CMF 2.2 plans?

2009-03-02 Thread Wichert Akkerman
Previously Charlie Clark wrote: Am 02.03.2009 um 19:46 schrieb Hanno Schlichting: This can happen in two ways, though. Either move the example- application bits into a different package or move the reusable bits into one. If you are really interested in doing this work, I'd be

Re: [Zope-CMF] [dev] CMF 2.2 plans?

2009-03-01 Thread Martin Aspeli
Jens Vagelpohl wrote: -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On Mar 1, 2009, at 04:01 , Martin Aspeli wrote: Jens Vagelpohl wrote: Are there _specific_ dependencies on unreleased code that would require new eggs? Let's identify which specific eggs are needed and concentrate on

Re: [Zope-CMF] [dev] CMF 2.2 plans?

2009-03-01 Thread Jens Vagelpohl
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On Mar 1, 2009, at 10:50 , Martin Aspeli wrote: Jens Vagelpohl wrote: On Mar 1, 2009, at 04:01 , Martin Aspeli wrote: Jens Vagelpohl wrote: Are there _specific_ dependencies on unreleased code that would require new eggs? Let's identify

Re: [Zope-CMF] [dev] CMF 2.2 plans?

2009-03-01 Thread Martin Aspeli
Jens Vagelpohl wrote: -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On Mar 1, 2009, at 10:50 , Martin Aspeli wrote: Jens Vagelpohl wrote: On Mar 1, 2009, at 04:01 , Martin Aspeli wrote: Jens Vagelpohl wrote: Are there _specific_ dependencies on unreleased code that would require

[Zope-CMF] [dev] CMF 2.2 plans?

2009-02-28 Thread Hanno Schlichting
Hi. Quoting a mail from Jens from September last year: Is there anything to hold back a CMF 2.2.0 beta at this point? I have one small todo item on my list regarding the changes to content type icons. Things I remember people working on: - Formlib based views - Add-views

Re: [Zope-CMF] [dev] CMF 2.2 plans?

2009-02-28 Thread Charlie Clark
Am 28.02.2009 um 13:55 schrieb Hanno Schlichting: Hi. Quoting a mail from Jens from September last year: Is there anything to hold back a CMF 2.2.0 beta at this point? I have one small todo item on my list regarding the changes to content type icons. Things I remember people working

Re: [Zope-CMF] [dev] CMF 2.2 plans?

2009-02-28 Thread Jens Vagelpohl
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On Feb 28, 2009, at 13:55 , Hanno Schlichting wrote: It should be no surprise, that I'd like to have official support for Zope 2.12 for CMF 2.2 as well ;) Nightly tests are running fine for all I can see. As Zope 2.12 is not likely to be

Re: [Zope-CMF] [dev] CMF 2.2 plans?

2009-02-28 Thread Martin Aspeli
Jens Vagelpohl wrote: Are there _specific_ dependencies on unreleased code that would require new eggs? Let's identify which specific eggs are needed and concentrate on those first. I am currently relying on backports/monkey patches for the add form stuff in code that may be part of

Re: [Zope-CMF] [dev] CMF 2.2 plans?

2009-02-28 Thread Jens Vagelpohl
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On Mar 1, 2009, at 04:01 , Martin Aspeli wrote: Jens Vagelpohl wrote: Are there _specific_ dependencies on unreleased code that would require new eggs? Let's identify which specific eggs are needed and concentrate on those first. I am