Hi!
Hanno Schlichting wrote:
yuppie wrote:
That would mean that CMFDefault-the-example-application will depend on
z3c.form. If we are going to split off the forms we need to split off
all browser views and the profiles that use these views. Something like
'cmf.app' that includes all the
Hi!
Charlie Clark wrote:
Am 02.03.2009 um 19:27 schrieb yuppie:
This is on my todo list, but I still have to write a proposal.
Hmm, I don't recall the issue here.
There wasn't much discussion about this.
Some time ago Dieter asked for grouping support:
Hi!
Martin Aspeli wrote:
Jens Vagelpohl wrote:
I'll look at CMFCore and CMFDefault over the next few days (I'm
traveling). Are there any code changes that you still need or is the
current trunk state ready to be released from your point of view?
I haven't looked into it in great
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Mar 2, 2009, at 11:30 , Hanno Schlichting wrote:
yuppie wrote:
2.) get rid of redundant type info properties
-
See http://mail.zope.org/pipermail/zope-cmf/2009-January/028059.html
Unfortunately
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
yuppie wrote:
Hi!
Martin Aspeli wrote:
Jens Vagelpohl wrote:
I'll look at CMFCore and CMFDefault over the next few days (I'm
traveling). Are there any code changes that you still need or is the
current trunk state ready to be released
Hi!
Tres Seaver wrote:
yuppie wrote:
1.) look up add view actions in a different way
---
The current implementation is not flexible enough. There is no way to
sort or group these actions.
This is on my todo list, but I still have to write a
yuppie wrote:
That would mean that CMFDefault-the-example-application will depend on
z3c.form. If we are going to split off the forms we need to split off
all browser views and the profiles that use these views. Something like
'cmf.app' that includes all the CMFDefault stuff Plone doesn't
Am 02.03.2009 um 19:27 schrieb yuppie:
This is on my todo list, but I still have to write a proposal.
Hmm, I don't recall the issue here.
There wasn't much discussion about this.
Some time ago Dieter asked for grouping support:
Am 02.03.2009 um 19:46 schrieb Hanno Schlichting:
This can happen in two ways, though. Either move the example-
application
bits into a different package or move the reusable bits into one. If
you
are really interested in doing this work, I'd be happy to figure out
what parts of
Previously Charlie Clark wrote:
Am 02.03.2009 um 19:46 schrieb Hanno Schlichting:
This can happen in two ways, though. Either move the example-
application
bits into a different package or move the reusable bits into one. If
you
are really interested in doing this work, I'd be
Jens Vagelpohl wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Mar 1, 2009, at 04:01 , Martin Aspeli wrote:
Jens Vagelpohl wrote:
Are there _specific_ dependencies on unreleased code that would
require new eggs? Let's identify which specific eggs are needed and
concentrate on
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Mar 1, 2009, at 10:50 , Martin Aspeli wrote:
Jens Vagelpohl wrote:
On Mar 1, 2009, at 04:01 , Martin Aspeli wrote:
Jens Vagelpohl wrote:
Are there _specific_ dependencies on unreleased code that would
require new eggs? Let's identify
Jens Vagelpohl wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Mar 1, 2009, at 10:50 , Martin Aspeli wrote:
Jens Vagelpohl wrote:
On Mar 1, 2009, at 04:01 , Martin Aspeli wrote:
Jens Vagelpohl wrote:
Are there _specific_ dependencies on unreleased code that would
require
Hi.
Quoting a mail from Jens from September last year:
Is there anything to hold back a CMF 2.2.0 beta at this point?
I have one small todo item on my list regarding the changes to content
type icons.
Things I remember people working on:
- Formlib based views
- Add-views
Am 28.02.2009 um 13:55 schrieb Hanno Schlichting:
Hi.
Quoting a mail from Jens from September last year:
Is there anything to hold back a CMF 2.2.0 beta at this point?
I have one small todo item on my list regarding the changes to content
type icons.
Things I remember people working
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Feb 28, 2009, at 13:55 , Hanno Schlichting wrote:
It should be no surprise, that I'd like to have official support for
Zope 2.12 for CMF 2.2 as well ;) Nightly tests are running fine for
all
I can see. As Zope 2.12 is not likely to be
Jens Vagelpohl wrote:
Are there _specific_ dependencies on unreleased code that would
require new eggs? Let's identify which specific eggs are needed and
concentrate on those first.
I am currently relying on backports/monkey patches for the add form
stuff in code that may be part of
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Mar 1, 2009, at 04:01 , Martin Aspeli wrote:
Jens Vagelpohl wrote:
Are there _specific_ dependencies on unreleased code that would
require new eggs? Let's identify which specific eggs are needed and
concentrate on those first.
I am
18 matches
Mail list logo