Jens Vagelpohl wrote:
On 6 Jun 2006, at 18:03, Jens Vagelpohl wrote:
On 6 Jun 2006, at 12:13, Wichert Akkerman wrote:
Previously Martin Aspeli wrote:
How much beta time do we need? I'm not the one to make this kind of
decision, but having an RC2 of Plone 2.5 if we're pretty confident the
chan
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 6 Jun 2006, at 18:03, Jens Vagelpohl wrote:
On 6 Jun 2006, at 12:13, Wichert Akkerman wrote:
Previously Martin Aspeli wrote:
How much beta time do we need? I'm not the one to make this kind of
decision, but having an RC2 of Plone 2.5 if we're
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 6 Jun 2006, at 12:13, Wichert Akkerman wrote:
Previously Martin Aspeli wrote:
How much beta time do we need? I'm not the one to make this kind of
decision, but having an RC2 of Plone 2.5 if we're pretty confident
the
changes are minor, coninc
Previously Martin Aspeli wrote:
> How much beta time do we need? I'm not the one to make this kind of
> decision, but having an RC2 of Plone 2.5 if we're pretty confident the
> changes are minor, coninciding with a beta 2 of CMF 1.6.1, if it delays
> things for a week or two seems a reasonabl
Hi Jens!
Jens Vagelpohl wrote:
On 6 Jun 2006, at 09:11, yuppie wrote:
3.) CMF 1.6.1 beta is already released. Are there plans to include an
updated GenericSetup in the final release? I can't guarantee my
checkin will cause no problems, so we would at least need additional
testing.
It does
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 6 Jun 2006, at 09:37, Martin Aspeli wrote:
On Tue, 06 Jun 2006 08:30:27 +0100, Jens Vagelpohl
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On 6 Jun 2006, at 09:11, yuppie wrote:
3.) CMF 1.6.1 beta is already released. Are there plans to
include an updated G
On Tue, 06 Jun 2006 08:30:27 +0100, Jens Vagelpohl
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 6 Jun 2006, at 09:11, yuppie wrote:
3.) CMF 1.6.1 beta is already released. Are there plans to include an
updated GenericSetup in the final release? I can't guaran