Gary Poster wrote:
So, um, Stephan, any ideas? :-) I know you are busy, but are you
interested in getting this in 2.6? I could help with testing as before, but
I'd prefer to have you signed on as the primary resource.
I don't know OrderedFolder very well but it'd be very useful in several
Hi all,
I have a little question on dtml-sqlvar
My problem is, that i want to insert values into a table and the type of
the values
are integer8.
I tried with dtml-sqlvar foo type=long but it doesnt work.
How can i use dtml-sqlvar with longs?
Will this feature be added in further versions?
Hi Terry,
Terry Kerr wrote:
I am running a fairly high traffic Zope server where people occassionly ftp
files in and out of the server.
Approximately once per week, the zope process will go to using 99%CPU and stay
like that untill it is restarted.
Since we've experienced identical
I don't know OrderedFolder very well but it'd be very useful in several
of my projects, so I can volunteer a bit of time in helping to get it
in Zope 2.6 as well.
I'd rather see that you used your time to put Formulator into 2.6 :-P
/Magnus
___
Howdi.
On Wed, Mar 06, 2002 at 09:24:04AM +0100, Andre Schubert wrote:
Hi all,
I have a little question on dtml-sqlvar
My problem is, that i want to insert values into a table and the type of
the values
are integer8.
I tried with dtml-sqlvar foo type=long but it doesnt work.
How
Hmmm ... i have been a bit to fast.
I wrapped my had around this, and found that long is
handled through the int, by simply stripping the L
of it (pythons string representation of long is 214321L ...)
so it get passed as a valid long string.
sorry for mixing things up ...
Greetings
Hmmm ... i have been a bit to fast.
I wrapped my had around this, and found that long is
handled through the int, by simply stripping the L
of it (pythons string representation of long is 214321L ...)
so it get passed as a valid long string.
sorry for mixing things up ...
Right, but works
Ive recently noticed that Zope doesnt change its working directory
when it starts up.
This has been a minor inconvenience for me recently when I wanted to
get a core dump from a long-running Zope, but its working directory
was set for somewhere that it couldnt write.
I know I could fix this in
Ok. Let me see ... dideldimm ... ah right ... stupid thing
they remove the L and pass it to int() ... i will fix that.
On Wed, Mar 06, 2002 at 11:48:26AM +0100, Andre Schubert wrote:
Hmmm ... i have been a bit to fast.
I wrapped my had around this, and found that long is
handled through the
Firstly, I'm trying to return a lazy list to a dtml-in, but it seems
that the __getitems__ are all called up front This is the class and
the print statement shows up in debugging before any debugging output
from within the dtml-in:
class LazyList:
def __init__(self, root,
Hi,
running Zope 2.5.1b1 and Python 2.1.2 with CMF 1.1, LDAPUserFolder 1.1,
CMFLDAP 1.2, CoreSessionTracking 0.9, DCWorkflow 0.4.1, CMFOptions 1.11, PIL
1.1.2, MySQL-python-0.9.0, python-ldap-1.10alpha3 (compiled with libldap
1.0.0 and liblber 1.0.0) on Linux Trustix 1.5 distribution, Zope crash
I don't know OrderedFolder very well but it'd be very useful in several
of my projects, so I can volunteer a bit of time in helping to get it
in Zope 2.6 as well.
Hi Martijn!
If you do so, please check with me for the newest version of Ordered Folder.
I have added a few features to
On Wed, 6 Mar 2002, Joachim Werner wrote:
- All the basic API (like store, delete, edit, ...) must be free of
HTTP specifics, so that I can modifiy content either over a web frontend or
over WebDAV, FTP, ... - and even via a fat client application like a
wxPython application. Currently that
Hi!
That is Stephan's product, not mine, and it *may* have some issues in
certain OS distributions (based on my experiences and another user's).
So,
it cannot be added itself without some work--further testing work if
nothing
else.
What kind of problems does OrderedFolder have? There is no
On Wednesday 06 March 2002 07:27 am, Tim McLaughlin allegedly wrote:
Firstly, I'm trying to return a lazy list to a dtml-in, but it seems
that the __getitems__ are all called up front This is the class and
the print statement shows up in debugging before any debugging output
from within
Casey Duncan wrote:
On Wednesday 06 March 2002 07:27 am, Tim McLaughlin allegedly wrote:
Firstly, I'm trying to return a lazy list to a dtml-in, but it seems
that the __getitems__ are all called up front This is the class and
the print statement shows up in debugging before any debugging
This maybe more 2.6 (or even 2.5.1 final) fodder:
I notice that in a vanilla Zope install, Anonymous users are allowed access
through WebDAV. This is bad for two reasons:
1. From a security perspective this discloses way too much information about
your site to the outside world.
2. Due to
From: Joachim Werner [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Hi!
What kind of problems does OrderedFolder have? There is no OS-specific
code
AFAIK. It is possible that there are browser-specific issues in the
frontend. But those would be easy to fix ...
Hi :-)
In certain circumstances, if you install
Hi:
I would like to propose my Paste Reference/symlink hack for
inclusion into Zope 2.6
C U!
-- Mario Valente
___
Zope-Dev maillist - [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-dev
** No cross posts or HTML
Casey Duncan wrote:
This maybe more 2.6 (or even 2.5.1 final) fodder:
I notice that in a vanilla Zope install, Anonymous users are allowed access
through WebDAV. This is bad for two reasons:
1. From a security perspective this discloses way too much information about
your site to the
Jean-Paul Smets wrote:
I could find out that certain cookie names work, some others do not
Works
__ac_
__ac_ra
__ac_rak1
__ac_nex1
__ac_erp5
Does not work
__ac
__ac_rack1
__ac_rack12
Really strange.
What browser are you using? Strange things like this happen for me
I think OrderedFolders is a great product and should be in the core ...
but does this also mean that TransparentFolder will get those parts
(that Shane mentioned some time ago) optimized that kept it from making
it into the core before?? If so ... sounds like a win-win situation.
On Wednesday 06 March 2002 04:58 am, Joachim Werner wrote:
Hi!
What I'd expect from Zope 2.6 depends a bit on when Zope 3 will be
available.
If we are talking about a couple of months, I'd prefer only having bug
fixes in 2.5.x (and no 2.6 at all). If we are talking about more than half
a
Is this a suggestion that TF go into the core? One other (major) problem
with TF is that it breaks session tracking site-wide, or at least the
ability to have more than one session id manager per Zope instance in CST;
I'm not sure about sessions in Zope 2.5...
TF seems to have too much
On Wednesday 06 March 2002 02:49 pm, [EMAIL PROTECTED] allegedly wrote:
Is this a suggestion that TF go into the core? One other (major) problem
with TF is that it breaks session tracking site-wide, or at least the
ability to have more than one session id manager per Zope instance in CST;
At 02:10 PM 3/6/2002 +0100, Jerome Alet wrote:
On Wed, 6 Mar 2002, Joachim Werner wrote:
- All the basic API (like store, delete, edit, ...) must be free of
HTTP specifics, so that I can modifiy content either over a web frontend or
over WebDAV, FTP, ... - and even via a fat client
At 10:40 AM 3/6/2002 -0500, you wrote:
From: Joachim Werner [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Hi!
What kind of problems does OrderedFolder have? There is no OS-specific
code
AFAIK. It is possible that there are browser-specific issues in the
frontend. But those would be easy to fix ...
Hi :-)
In
From: Stephan Richter [EMAIL PROTECTED]
If OF will make it in the core, the ZBabel stuff will be taken out of it
in
anyway, since no part of Zope has something like that in it. I am also
tempted to say that only the ordering module should go in (maybe the limit
as well), since other
Casey Duncan wrote:
Also Zope 3 will render TF superfluous.
As does the skins tool in the CMF.
I'm pretty sceptical on the whole OrderedFolder front too, IIRC, it does a lot
more than just provide ordered folders!
cheers,
Chris
___
Zope-Dev
Joachim Werner writes:
- Storage should be completely separate from the data model. It should be
possible to design a content class and then store it either in ZODB, the
file system, an RDBMS or an LDAP server or whatever.
Isn't that already possible (implement your alternative storage
that
Jean-Paul Smets writes:
I could find out that certain cookie names work, some others do not
Works
Really strange.
Could you use tcpwatch (or another TCP logger) to see whether
the Zope response contains the cookie header. If not, this would
be a Zope problem we could debug. If so,
Terry Kerr writes:
I am running a fairly high traffic Zope server where people occassionly ftp
files in and out of the server.
Approximately once per week, the zope process will go to using 99%CPU and stay
like that untill it is restarted. The error shown in the stupid log file is:
- Original Message -
From: Brian Lloyd [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, February 28, 2002 10:00
Subject: [Zope-Coders] Zope 2.6 planning - call for contributors!
http://dev.zope.org/Resources/zope_260_plan.html
I wholeheartedly agree that
Stephan Richter wrote:
If OF will make it in the core, the ZBabel stuff will be taken out of
it in anyway, since no part of Zope has something like that in it. I
am also tempted to say that only the ordering module should go in
(maybe the limit as well), since other functionality seems
I am afraid I must second this opinion. We recently looked at
OrderedFolder, thinking to subclass it
to produce our Slideshow product. The idea was to make a lightweight
web-based replacement for PowerPoint
where you can define the order of the slides and can hide/show them
individually.
Hi!
I'm implementing a simple db, using the same methods in the JobBoard
example. I looked at Kube, but I'd like something a bit more generic.
I'm trying to make add/edit forms and display pages as simple as
possible. Rather than have custom versions of all of these, each with
copies of the
Jean-Paul Smets wrote:
I could find out that certain cookie names work, some others do not
Works
__ac_
__ac_ra
__ac_rak1
__ac_nex1
__ac_erp5
Does not work
__ac
__ac_rack1
__ac_rack12
Really strange.
What browser are you using? Strange things like this happen
37 matches
Mail list logo
