-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Philipp von Weitershausen wrote:
Tres Seaver wrote:
We neeed to do a Zope3 3.2.2 release to go along with 2.9.4
Two reasons:
- Better release management for Zope2: we should be shipping with
appropriately tagged releases of our dependencies
On Jul 8, 2006, at 1:11 AM, Andreas Jung wrote:
--On 7. Juli 2006 11:03:06 -0400 Jim Fulton [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I think we should do a 2.9.4 release to incorporate the recent hot
fix.
This is easy for me to say, since I won't be doing it. :)
Because this recent fix actually fixed
--On 8. Juli 2006 07:45:01 -0400 Jim Fulton [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Jul 8, 2006, at 1:11 AM, Andreas Jung wrote:
--On 7. Juli 2006 11:03:06 -0400 Jim Fulton [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I think we should do a 2.9.4 release to incorporate the recent hot
fix.
This is easy for me to say,
--On 8. Juli 2006 07:35:04 -0400 Tres Seaver [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Philipp von Weitershausen wrote:
Tres Seaver wrote:
We neeed to do a Zope3 3.2.2 release to go along with 2.9.4
Two reasons:
- Better release management for Zope2: we
On Jul 8, 2006, at 8:12 AM, Andreas Jung wrote:
--On 8. Juli 2006 07:45:01 -0400 Jim Fulton [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Jul 8, 2006, at 1:11 AM, Andreas Jung wrote:
--On 7. Juli 2006 11:03:06 -0400 Jim Fulton [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I think we should do a 2.9.4 release to
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Michael Haubenwallner wrote:
Tres Seaver wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Michael Haubenwallner wrote:
Tres Seaver wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Jim Fulton wrote:
Zope 3, as releases is not
On Jul 8, 2006, at 8:12 AM, Andreas Jung wrote:
--On 8. Juli 2006 07:45:01 -0400 Jim Fulton [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Only if there is no other option. Tres' patch seems to resolve this
issue and with further testing there is no need to remove the
functionality.
Seems isn't good enough.
On Jul 8, 2006, at 9:17 AM, Andreas Jung wrote:
On Jul 8, 2006, at 8:12 AM, Andreas Jung wrote:
--On 8. Juli 2006 07:45:01 -0400 Jim Fulton [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Only if there is no other option. Tres' patch seems to resolve this
issue and with further testing there is no need to
--On 8. Juli 2006 09:53:47 -0400 Jim Fulton [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Maybe you aren't listening.
I am listening very well.
Tres came up with this sledge hammer because he has no confidence
in people's willingness to test and implement this feature properly.
I am fine with the
On Jul 8, 2006, at 10:09 AM, Andreas Jung wrote:
--On 8. Juli 2006 09:53:47 -0400 Jim Fulton [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
...
Tres came up with this sledge hammer because he has no confidence
in people's willingness to test and implement this feature
properly.
I am fine with the
Just to make the matters clear, when you say 'the last hotfix' Jim, do
you mean the Hotfix-20060705?
I ask because I'm about to roll a hotfix installer for Plone and if
there's an issue with that one I can hold back the installer.
--
Sidnei da Silva
Enfold Systems
...
You seem to be the only one championing TTW reST?
I am only champion against crude removal of features and against and a
shortsighted preception.
I'm for keeping it (or something like it) too.
That doesn't deserve an answer.
Are you unwilling to
write the tests necessary to keep
On Jul 8, 2006, at 12:05 PM, Alec Mitchell wrote:
On 7/8/06, Sidnei da Silva [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Just to make the matters clear, when you say 'the last hotfix'
Jim, do
you mean the Hotfix-20060705?
I ask because I'm about to roll a hotfix installer for Plone and if
there's an issue
On Jul 8, 2006, at 11:32 AM, Tino Wildenhain wrote:
...
You seem to be the only one championing TTW reST?
I am only champion against crude removal of features and against
and a
shortsighted preception.
I'm for keeping it (or something like it) too.
Are you volunteering to do a
On Jul 8, 2006, at 10:41 AM, Andreas Jung wrote:
--On 8. Juli 2006 10:16:30 -0400 Jim Fulton [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Yes, someone has to write the tests at some time, soon.
Right. Before 2.10.
...so we have some time...
Sadly, but that's a different problem.
As I pointed out the
--On 8. Juli 2006 14:37:06 -0400 Jim Fulton [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Jul 8, 2006, at 11:32 AM, Tino Wildenhain wrote:
...
You seem to be the only one championing TTW reST?
I am only champion against crude removal of features and against
and a
shortsighted preception.
I'm for
On Jul 8, 2006, at 10:53 AM, Sidnei da Silva wrote:
Just to make the matters clear, when you say 'the last hotfix' Jim, do
you mean the Hotfix-20060705?
No, I was referring to the one before that. The November '0f
hot fix purported to solve the same problem.
Jim
--
Jim Fulton
On Jul 8, 2006, at 2:47 PM, Andreas Jung wrote:
--On 8. Juli 2006 14:37:06 -0400 Jim Fulton [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Jul 8, 2006, at 11:32 AM, Tino Wildenhain wrote:
...
You seem to be the only one championing TTW reST?
I am only champion against crude removal of features and
--On 8. Juli 2006 14:42:31 -0400 Jim Fulton [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
This can happen all the time. A problem in the release process does
not justify the removal of a feature until we tried our best to
solve the problem. Use the sledge hammer as a last resort.
The problem in the release
--On 8. Juli 2006 15:05:21 -0400 Jim Fulton [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I think this applies here as well.
1. ZClasses are not a security threat. reST is. That's a huge difference.
Being a security thread or not ...how will you prove that a module X is a
thread or not? Without source code
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Jim Fulton wrote:
On Jul 8, 2006, at 9:17 AM, Andreas Jung wrote:
On Jul 8, 2006, at 8:12 AM, Andreas Jung wrote:
--On 8. Juli 2006 07:45:01 -0400 Jim Fulton [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Only if there is no other option. Tres' patch seems to
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Jim Fulton wrote:
On Jul 8, 2006, at 10:09 AM, Andreas Jung wrote:
--On 8. Juli 2006 09:53:47 -0400 Jim Fulton [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
...
Tres came up with this sledge hammer because he has no confidence
in people's willingness to test
Andreas Jung wrote at 2006-7-8 14:12 +0200:
... removing TTW reST ...
[Andreas]
In addition I don't see a big problem for Zope-only(!) apps.
Of course, you must also consider applications built on top
of Zope -- such as ZWiki and Plone. They, too, need to be
protected.
[Jim] ... retain only
Jim Fulton wrote:
...
You mean auditing. Testing would not help imho. Testing
only checks if expected behavior still works. And nobody
expects the spanish inquisiton *wink* ;)
You can test that trying to do fil-inclusion fails.
For example if I'd were the one who would have written
the
On 5/25/06, Philipp von Weitershausen [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I think they do pretty much the same thing (but I could be mistaken).
Are they interchangeable? If not, are they compatible so that we just
add both ways to both files? If they're not compatible, which one should
we use in the
25 matches
Mail list logo
