[Zope-dev] Zope Tests: 8 OK, 1 Failed

2006-10-30 Thread Zope Tests Summarizer
Summary of messages to the zope-tests list. Period Sun Oct 29 11:00:02 2006 UTC to Mon Oct 30 11:00:02 2006 UTC. There were 9 messages: 9 from Zope Unit Tests. Test failures - Subject: FAILED (errors=1) : Zope-trunk Python-2.4.3 : Linux From: Zope Unit Tests Date: Sun Oct 29

[Zope-dev] Re: [z3-five] RFC: The future of Products.Five

2006-10-30 Thread Andreas Jung
--On 30. Oktober 2006 00:01:33 +0100 Philipp von Weitershausen [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: * It is unclear to me at this point what Zope 2's egg story will be. I *hope* that 2.11 will get the same egg story as the Zope 3.4 that ships with it does, though noone has talked about eggifying Zope

[Zope-dev] Re: [z3-five] RFC: The future of Products.Five

2006-10-30 Thread Lennart Regebro
I don't mind making Products.Five smaller. And I don't mind making loads of small packages called five.something either. That said, I think it's important to make as much of zope3 work under zope2, so any zope3 package included in the zope2 distribution should also have it's corresponding five

[Zope-dev] Re: RFC: The future of Products.Five(green eggs and zope)

2006-10-30 Thread whit
Philipp von Weitershausen wrote: snip / I don't think all of these things should go into the Products.Five anymore, for several reasons: * We're trying to get away from writing products and into writing Python packages that can e.g. be installed as eggs. * Some of these things are not

[Zope-dev] Re: [z3-five] RFC: The future of Products.Five

2006-10-30 Thread whit
Andreas Jung wrote: --On 30. Oktober 2006 00:01:33 +0100 Philipp von Weitershausen [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: * It is unclear to me at this point what Zope 2's egg story will be. I *hope* that 2.11 will get the same egg story as the Zope 3.4 that ships with it does, though noone has talked

[Zope-dev] Re: [z3-five] RFC: The future of Products.Five

2006-10-30 Thread Philipp von Weitershausen
Andreas Jung wrote: What are our benefits from a Z2 Eggification. Eggification is basically about packaging and distribution of components with little dependencies in order to re-use them in other contexts. However most components of Zope 2 are heavily dependent on others. Yes, that's true.

[Zope-dev] Re: RFC: The future of Products.Five

2006-10-30 Thread Philipp von Weitershausen
Lennart Regebro wrote: I don't mind making Products.Five smaller. And I don't mind making loads of small packages called five.something either. That said, I think it's important to make as much of zope3 work under zope2, so any zope3 package included in the zope2 distribution should also have

[Zope-dev] Re: RFC: The future of Products.Five

2006-10-30 Thread Lennart Regebro
On 10/31/06, Philipp von Weitershausen [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Lennart Regebro wrote: I don't mind making Products.Five smaller. And I don't mind making loads of small packages called five.something either. That said, I think it's important to make as much of zope3 work under zope2, so any