On Jan 10, 2012, at 10:17 AM, Jim Fulton wrote:
BTW, zope.app.wsgi isn't in the ZTK. :)
It's not in ztk-versions.cfg, but it is in zopeapp-versions.cfg.
That's still part of ZTK package.
___
Zope-Dev maillist - Zope-Dev@zope.org
On Dec 18, 2011, at 5:52 AM, Marius Gedminas wrote:
One thing leaves me baffled: how was it possible to make the release to PyPI
(which means at the very least python setup.py sdist upload) if python
setup.py had that missing import?
Because buildout was used:
./bin/buildout setup .
On Dec 16, 2011, at 10:57 PM, Maurits van Rees wrote:
Can someone create a new release of zc.queue? zvezdan and gary are owners on
PyPI.
I'll review and release.
___
Zope-Dev maillist - Zope-Dev@zope.org
On Dec 17, 2011, at 5:40 PM, Zvezdan Petkovic wrote:
I'll review and release.
Done.
zc.queue-1.2 is on PyPI.
___
Zope-Dev maillist - Zope-Dev@zope.org
https://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-dev
** No cross posts or HTML encoding! **
(Related
On Dec 17, 2011, at 7:13 PM, Maurits van Rees wrote:
There is a problem with the setup.py of 1.2 though: 'import os' is missing so
it cannot be used. I have fixed it on trunk. Could you release a new
version?
Done.
zc.queue-1.2.1 is now on PyPI.
P.S. Lessons learned:
1. Run pyflakes
On Nov 29, 2011, at 4:05 PM, Tres Seaver wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 11/29/2011 11:48 AM, Gediminas Paulauskas wrote:
-- Forwarded message -- From: Zvezdan Petkovic
zvez...@zope.com Date: 2011/2/2 Subject: Re: [Checkins] SVN:
zope.app.folder
On Sep 23, 2011, at 3:36 AM, Chris Withers wrote:
I just tried zope.interface 3.8.0 on MacOS X Lion and got:
Getting distribution for 'zope.interface'.
unable to execute gcc-4.0: No such file or directory
On Aug 8, 2011, at 4:44 PM, Chris McDonough wrote:
Kudos to whomever turned the transaction package's transaction manager into
a context manager and was thoughtful enough to provide the attempts method
(which returns a separate context manager, wrapping the txn context manager,
and
On May 6, 2010, at 9:09 AM, Tres Seaver wrote:
Christian Theune has already mentioned that the inclusion of the author
check in his script was a misunderstanding.
If you did not see that message already it's here:
https://mail.zope.org/pipermail/zope-dev/2010-April/040223.html
Can we
On May 6, 2010, at 9:52 AM, Christian Theune wrote:
You're right. And I was slow and laggy. The change is in. It's been a
mis-assumption on my side to think author information being equal to
copyright ownership and I fixed that in the script.
Thank you.
Zvezdan
On May 5, 2010, at 2:42 PM, Tres Seaver wrote:
Log message for revision 112025:
Conform to repository policy.
...
setup(
name='zope.minmax',
version='1.1.3dev',
-author='Zope Corporation and Contributors',
+author='Zope Foundation and Contributors',
On May 4, 2010, at 6:07 AM, Martijn Faassen wrote:
For a while already people have been making changes that at least break
tests on 2.4. For instance, zope.testing has some facility to pretty print a
dictionary that sorts the keys, because Python 2.4's built-in pretty print
module
On Apr 9, 2010, at 10:57 AM, Fred Drake wrote:
On Fri, Apr 9, 2010 at 10:43 AM, Tres Seaver tsea...@palladion.com wrote:
It seems reasonable to me that it *should* work, though I'm not sure how to
write the code which tests that.
See my later follow-up as well.
In particular, while it
On Apr 7, 2010, at 1:33 PM, David Glick wrote:
I also need to make some updates to make zc.authorizedotnet work with
Python 2.6, as it currently depends (via zc.ssl) on ssl-for-setuptools, which
is a backport of the ssl module that ships with Python 2.6.
You will not need to make those
On Apr 7, 2010, at 2:35 PM, David Glick wrote:
Understood. Now that Plone 4 is almost ready and using Python 2.6,
there are a number of Plone GetPaid users who are ready to use these
changes as soon as they're released. :)
zc.ssl-1.2 and zc.authorizedotnet-1.3.1 have been tagged and released
On Dec 24, 2009, at 8:50 AM, Fabio Tranchitella wrote:
I don't think we can avoid the error, and to be honest I consider the code in
zope.minmax to be wrong.
import zope.testing
x = zope.testing.doctest.DocTestFile(...
The import is wrong, it should be zope.testing.doctest, and I
On Dec 24, 2009, at 10:13 AM, Fabio Tranchitella wrote:
* 2009-12-24 15:43, Zvezdan Petkovic wrote:
You did not import zope.testing.doctest, but the reference to it remains.
I don't think that's a fix.
You are right, I committed the right fix.
I was just about to commit the same thing
On Dec 24, 2009, at 10:26 AM, Fabio Tranchitella wrote:
* 2009-12-24 16:20, Zvezdan Petkovic wrote:
Before I release the egg on PyPI:
1. Should we release as 1.1.2 (a minor change), or
2. Does the removal of dependency on zope.testing warrants a
bump to 1.2.0?
I
On Nov 30, 2009, at 2:24 PM, Gary Poster wrote:
3) I also think that utility is a bad name. Is singleton two letters too
long?
Yes and not because singleton is longer.
It just a bad name.
:-)
___
Zope-Dev maillist - Zope-Dev@zope.org
On Nov 30, 2009, at 4:05 PM, Zvezdan Petkovic wrote:
On Nov 30, 2009, at 2:24 PM, Gary Poster wrote:
3) I also think that utility is a bad name. Is singleton two letters
too long?
Yes and not because singleton is longer.
It just a bad name.
:-)
To clarify because of
1
On Nov 30, 2009, at 4:40 PM, Gary Poster wrote:
Put yet another way, how are 99+% of our utility usages not singletons?
Therein lies the problem.
Singletons are singletons in 100% of cases.
Since utilities are not singletons in 100% of cases they are not singletons by
definition.
If that's
On Sep 21, 2009, at 11:42 AM, Martijn Faassen wrote:
* zope.minmax: is this package being used? If not, we could consider
removing it from the ZTK.
It's easy to find that it's used by zope.session.
It is used for conflict resolution.
Regards,
Zvezdan
On Apr 10, 2009, at 12:31 PM, Hanno Schlichting wrote:
We are in the business of content management. The most valuable
information the system and the entire physical machine has is the
content in the system. You don't run web applications on any kind of
shared servers where the system has any
On Mon, Apr 6, 2009 at 11:47 AM, Baiju M mba...@zeomega.net wrote:
Why we cannot use literal blocks for source code ?
From the above documentations, I can see that it works for doctest.
And we have used it in many places. Also in PyPI
(long_description), it looks better.
Because reST
On Apr 1, 2009, at 5:44 PM, Jacob Holm wrote:
If this whitespace fix is based on the current style guide, I think
the guide needs to be fixed. I find the fixed version much less
readable. A function that takes this many arguments should have an
exception to the PEP 8 rule of no
On Mar 11, 2009, at 10:29 AM, Martijn Faassen wrote:
Since Jim says you're not missing something, I'm going to add to the
Zope Framework Steering Group decisions that this is enough and we
could clean up __init__.py's to this if we would want to.
So, let me try to understand the decision
On Mar 5, 2009, at 5:02 PM, Laurence Rowe wrote:
Gary Poster wrote:
I disagree with the blanket statement.
I do lean towards not having the extras for the test package only.
I'm fine with the policy If you want zope.testing for your tests,
then keep it as a dependency for the package.
But
On Feb 24, 2009, at 8:53 AM, Dan Korostelev wrote:
2009/2/24 Benji York:
On Tue, Feb 24, 2009 at 8:29 AM, Dan Korostelev wrote:
Heh, nice trick with `z` :) Thank you.
A slight refinement:
svn mkdir path-to-repo/new-project{,trunk,tags,branches}
Using the `z` trick, that would be:
On Feb 19, 2009, at 5:13 AM, Wichert Akkerman wrote:
Previously Christian Theune wrote:
Which attribute naming is current?
==
Do we use under_scores or mixedCaseNames?
I think I remember that we decided to follow PEP 8 for new code and
invoke the local
Which attribute naming is current?
==
Do we use under_scores or mixedCaseNames?
I think I remember that we decided to follow PEP 8 for new code and
invoke the local consistentency rule on old code. Is that correct?
According to this document in Zope3
On Feb 19, 2009, at 11:03 AM, Jim Fulton wrote:
I sort my imports. Period. This makes from imports come before
regular imports (because f comes before i). I discourage from
imports, so this isn't much of an issue for me except for old code.
Having imports sorted takes very little effort and
On Feb 19, 2009, at 12:43 PM, Tres Seaver wrote:
Exactly . As I mentioned in the previous post, sorting is the *key*
here. [Pun intended].
Grouping (python, zope., myapp. modules order), or non-grouping,
becomes a non-issue when imports are sorted.
+1
- -1. I prefer the PEP8 grouping,
On Feb 2, 2009, at 9:28 AM, Sebastien Douche wrote:
KGS 1.x uses new anatomy (major/minor/):
http://download.zope.org/zope3.4/intro.html
Am I the only one who finds those pale green links on a white
background quite unreadable?
The code examples with that same color on dark grey are OK, but
On Dec 8, 2008, at 10:56 AM, Benji York wrote:
On Mon, Dec 8, 2008 at 2:22 AM, Michael Howitz [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Log message for revision 93766:
color by default
This setting apparently causes problems for people who use Emacs, so
for zope. and zc. packages at least, we don't use
On Nov 1, 2008, at 3:56 PM, Adam GROSZER wrote:
Hello Benji,
Seems like your r80928 breaks windows compatibility, because it does
not support os.link and os.unlink.
FWIW, os.unlink _is_ supported on Windows.
It's identical to os.remove.
However, os.link is Unix specific and should be
On Oct 20, 2008, at 9:45 AM, Tres Seaver wrote:
Did you look at the include' directories?
$ svn propget svn:externals $ZSVN/zope.app.container/tags/3.5.6/
include
persistent svn://svn.zope.org/repos/main/ZODB/trunk/src/
persistent
zope.proxy \
On Oct 5, 2008, at 1:57 AM, Adam Groszer wrote:
Log message for revision 91759:
gmail seems to burp nowadays on smtp quit, deep down in smtplib
mail should be safely sent at this point
... deep down ... should be ...
These words do not sound very encouraging.
On Oct 5, 2008, at 4:51 AM, Adam Groszer wrote:
connection.sendmail(fromaddr, toaddrs, message)
try:
connection.quit()
-except:
+except socket.sslerror:
+#something weird happened while quiting
pass
This is better because
On Jun 9, 2008, at 9:38 PM, Daniel Blackburn wrote:
It seems that there either may be an issue with Zope security or I do
not understand it properly. Please let me know what you guys think.
It seems you misunderstood it.
Lets say we have a principal with no direct permissions or roles
request._environ['REMOTE_ADDR'].
On a basis of privacy of attributes starting with underscore, such
as _environ, I would suggest using request.headers (for X-Forwarded-
For) and request.environment instead. These are defined in the public
interface API.
--
Zvezdan Petkovic [EMAIL PROTECTED
On Jan 25, 2008, at 8:56 AM, Christophe Combelles wrote:
Zvezdan Petkovic a écrit :
On Jan 24, 2008, at 9:16 PM, Stephan Richter wrote:
Before I am going to start that process, I wanted to ask whether
people would like to see any new packages in the KGS or whether
there are new releases
of zc.buildout-1.0.0b31 in
the KGS?
--
Zvezdan Petkovic [EMAIL PROTECTED]
___
Zope-Dev maillist - Zope-Dev@zope.org
http://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-dev
** No cross posts or HTML encoding! **
(Related lists -
http://mail.zope.org/mailman
42 matches
Mail list logo
