Hello Casey,
One thing to remember is that running multi-treaded Python apps on a
multi-processor box is suboptimal unless you can bind all the threads to a
single processor, due to the Python GIL.
IOW : Buying a dual processor computer is not so usefull if the computer
is dedicated
On Wednesday 28 Aug 2002 6:46 pm, Casey Duncan wrote:
One other difference is classically due to a more efficient select
mechanism on Unix than Windows (ala asyncore), making multitasking more
efficient on *nix. However, I don't know if that's true anymore post-NT4.
Yes, thats still true.
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Hello,
I have a question for you zope administrators out there :
What are your experiences whith zope running on Windows NT/2K? No matter
what I try , zope will run significant faster on a Unixlike system
(with the same hardware), especially when working alot with
Adrian Hungate wrote:
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Hello,
I have a question for you zope administrators out there :
What are your experiences whith zope running on Windows NT/2K? No matter
what I try , zope will run significant faster on a Unixlike system
(with the same hardware), especially when
One thing to remember is that running multi-treaded Python apps on a
multi-processor box is suboptimal unless you can bind all the threads to a
single processor, due to the Python GIL.
So, I'm not surprised that a 800MHz Athlon outperforms a dual 1GHz Piii with
Zope, regardless of OS. As for
I'm not sure that is the case you know. Oracle 9i Linux is faster on my
Linux Athlon 800 than the same release on my Win2k Dual Piii 1GHz.
Also my Win box has 1Gb ram, while my Linux box has only 512Mb...
In other news Apache is reported to run faster on Linux that Win2000,
as is
Win2k, nor run Zope on Windows, so I'm really not sure why this was, and
likely will never know.
Sean
-Original Message-
From: Adam Manock [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, August 28, 2002 10:51 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [Zope-dev] Slow zope on windows 2000?
I'm
This, however, is almost an order of magnitude difference, and may need
further investigation...
Adam
There´s also a difference between Win2000 and Win2000 Server. The Server
version is optimised for network and system operations(thread/memory
allocation) and really much faster than the
]
Sent: Wednesday, August 28, 2002 8:12 PM
Subject: AW: [Zope-dev] Slow zope on windows 2000?
This, however, is almost an order of magnitude difference, and may need
further investigation...
Adam
There´s also a difference between Win2000 and Win2000 Server. The Server
version
, except
under real stress.
Sean
-Original Message-
From: Arndt Droullier [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, August 28, 2002 12:13 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: AW: [Zope-dev] Slow zope on windows 2000?
This, however, is almost an order of magnitude difference, and may need
10 matches
Mail list logo
