I recently read RFC 2396 which defines the generic URI syntax
and especially the URL syntax.
I recognized, that
* Zope forbids many characters in ids (with the error message
"not allowed in URLs"), that are legal characters
in URL path segments:
generally allowed in URL's: -_.!~*'()
> But like I told ChrisW, I think BerkeleyStorage will fill the
> need that
> PartitionedFileStorage was only partitially addressing.
How is the new BerkeleyStorage product coming along?
/Magnus
###
This message has been scanned by F-Secure Anti-Virus f
Dirksen wrote:
> My site is installed with the Membership system. I want to
> store some photos in each member. So I create a new member
> ZClass, subclassing PortalMember and ObjectManager, and set the
> 'manage_main' as the main view. Under the instance of this new
> member ZClass, I can add im
Steve Alexander <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Steve Alexander wrote:
>
> >
> > I believe the latest LoginManager allows you to specify what roles a
> > user has, and compute these each request, based on the details of the
> > request.
> >
> > This is probably more useful than having dynamically c
Hello,
A new development release of the "Core Session Tracking" product (0.4) is
available at http://www.zope.org/Members/mcdonc/Products/CoreSessionTracking
This release makes substantial interface and feature changes including using
an internal mounted storage to provide an "internal" session
hi there.
i have certain problems with the catalog class. i have something over 9000
objects (all of the same type) cataloged, and it does not only take REAL
long to reindex them (but hey, i could live with that), sometimes it also
makes the python-process sort of 'hang up' - it merly crushes the
Steve Alexander wrote:
>
> Shane Hathaway wrote:
>
> >
> > Should be, although I just realized I don't know whether 0.0.2 was
> > intended for Zope 2.2 or 2.3.
>
> There is no difference between the PartitionedFile.py files in the 2.2
> and 2.3 versions, so I guess 0.0.2 will do as well for eit
Shane Hathaway wrote:
>
> Should be, although I just realized I don't know whether 0.0.2 was
> intended for Zope 2.2 or 2.3.
There is no difference between the PartitionedFile.py files in the 2.2
and 2.3 versions, so I guess 0.0.2 will do as well for either.
--
Steve Alexander
Software Enginee
Shane Hathaway <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Now BerkeleyStorage is on its way and once that's ready,
> PartitionedFileStorage will have such a small audience that it won't be
> worth the trouble. Oh well, it was a fun experiment.
Can you pleae expand on this.. what about BerkeleyStorage is on it
Y'know since replying to this message originally, I've learned a lot about
pickled representations of Zope objects and I think I can answer this more
cogently:
- Instances of classes which inherit from Persistence.Persistent are
represented as an individual pickle. Their attributes are contained
Steve Alexander wrote:
>
> Shane Hathaway wrote:
>
> >
> > BTW, Evan helped me find and correct a bug. You'll only run into it if
> > you set your partition size to less than the size of the largest ZODB
> > objects.
>
> The new version of FileStorage.py in PartitionedFileStorage for 2.3
> ove
Chris Withers wrote:
>
> Shane Hathaway wrote:
> >
> > BTW, Evan helped me find and correct a bug. You'll only run into it if
> > you set your partition size to less than the size of the largest ZODB
> > objects.
>
> That's fixed in 0.0.2, right?
Should be, although I just realized I don't kno
Lee, I've been diddling around with the same stuff. It took me a lot
of introspection with printing of errors via MrCreosote/Spew. To
answer your question, 'section' is an object which contains an
attribute 'blocks'. If you want to render the dtml in there, you can
run the 'render_blocks' metho
Shane Hathaway wrote:
>
> BTW, Evan helped me find and correct a bug. You'll only run into it if
> you set your partition size to less than the size of the largest ZODB
> objects.
The new version of FileStorage.py in PartitionedFileStorage for 2.3
overwrites some of the changes made the FileSt
Jim Fulton wrote:
>
> - Policies to control whether multiple revisions are stored
> or whether revisions are removed by packing on a object-by-object
> or transaction-by-transaction basis.
> You could keep significant historical revisions for important objects, such
> as Wiki p
Steve Alexander wrote:
>
> I believe the latest LoginManager allows you to specify what roles a
> user has, and compute these each request, based on the details of the
> request.
>
> This is probably more useful than having dynamically computed
> permissions; While I can see how a user's role
Shane Hathaway wrote:
>
> BTW, Evan helped me find and correct a bug. You'll only run into it if
> you set your partition size to less than the size of the largest ZODB
> objects.
That's fixed in 0.0.2, right?
Well, anyway, I changed the line in FileStorage.py as follows:
# Use 0.5 GB part
Chris Withers wrote:
>
> Shane Hathaway wrote:
> >
> > I just realized I could use the "patch" command to backport. So I made
> > a new tarball. Have fun!
> >
> >
>http://www.zope.org/Members/hathawsh/PartitionedFileStorage/PartitionedFileStorage-0.0.1-2_2.tar.gz/view
>
> great :-)
>
> It's
Shane Hathaway wrote:
>
> I just realized I could use the "patch" command to backport. So I made
> a new tarball. Have fun!
>
>
>http://www.zope.org/Members/hathawsh/PartitionedFileStorage/PartitionedFileStorage-0.0.1-2_2.tar.gz/view
great :-)
It's installed and running now. No problems yet
Heinz-Josef Claes wrote:
>
> Our requrements are a permissioning system which depends on a matrix:
> There are two independend qualities which describe, if a user is allowed
> to see a document. This can be displayed in a matrix. Only if *both*
> qualities match, the user is allowed to see it.
>
Steve Spicklemire wrote:
>
> Hi Chris,
>
>OK... you need to tell us where the index_html's are and what they have
> in them! ;-)
Doesn't seem to matter what's in them...
Say there's one in folder1 and one in folder2, which one should be used?
Why are neither of them being used?
cheers,
Itamar Shtull-Trauring wrote:
>
> Chris Withers wrote:
>
> > > In ZClasses it is possible to control where a ZClass instance
> > > should be permitted to be added, in other words show up
> > > in the factory listing in a ObjectManagers manage_main view.
> >
> > Didn't Itamar have a proposal/proj
Chris McDonough wrote:
>
> The ZODB tries
> hard to avoid error conditions for you by retrying conflicting writes, but
> if you really pound the snot out of a particular object, it'll let you know.
That's gotta be one for the Zope quotes board, if I could onyl remember
the URL :-)
> and step th
At 03:08 PM 1/2/01 +1100, Itai Tavor wrote:
>Hi Steve,
>
>>Steve Spicklemire wrote:
>
>> > "Itai" == Itai Tavor <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>>
>> Itai> Maybe with this
>> Itai> SkinScript: WITH Doers.getItem(self.doerID) CALCULATE
>> Itai> self.doerID=RESULT.id or '' ? But I'm no
Chris Withers wrote:
> > In ZClasses it is possible to control where a ZClass instance
> > should be permitted to be added, in other words show up
> > in the factory listing in a ObjectManagers manage_main view.
>
> Didn't Itamar have a proposal/project on this?
It's still unimplemented - you c
Hi,
I'm very new to zope and have to eximine, if it's usable for our
requirements.
The question I have, is very simple or perhaps very difficult, I don't
know.
Our requrements are a permissioning system which depends on a matrix:
There are two independend qualities which describe, if a user is
Chris Withers wrote:
>
> Michael Bernstein wrote:
> >
> > Hmm. Aren't postings CatalogAware? If they're not, shouldn't
> > they be?
>
> Why? ;-)
>
> Squishdot manages the cataloging, re-cataloging and un-cataloging of its
> own postings. I don't think CatalogAware would make that process any
>
Johan Carlsson wrote:
>
> In ZClasses it is possible to control where a ZClass instance
> should be permitted to be added, in other words show up
> in the factory listing in a ObjectManagers manage_main view.
Didn't Itamar have a proposal/project on this?
How did it work out?
cheers,
Chris
_
Michael Bernstein wrote:
>
> Hmm. Aren't postings CatalogAware? If they're not, shouldn't
> they be?
Why? ;-)
Squishdot manages the cataloging, re-cataloging and un-cataloging of its
own postings. I don't think CatalogAware would make that process any
simpler or more reliable...
*grinz*
Chris
Itamar Shtull-Trauring wrote:
>
> Chris Withers wrote:
>
> > ...in which case, I wonder why CatalogAwareness goes to the trouble of
> > unindexing and then re-indexing?
>
> Because in older ZCatalog (before 2.3 and maybe before 2.2.4),
> catalog_object did not uncatalog automatically. When in d
Hello All !
After installing latest stable version of Zope (2.2.4) I tried to
install ZFormulator version 0.2. And as result got 2 problems with
permissions system. First was in ZFormulator itself, and was corrected:
__roles__ = ('manager',)
was changed to
__roles__ = ('Manager',)
but this
31 matches
Mail list logo
