Gary Poster wrote:
> So, um, Stephan, any ideas? :-) I know you are busy, but are you
> interested in getting this in 2.6? I could help with testing as before, but
> I'd prefer to have you signed on as the primary resource.
I don't know OrderedFolder very well but it'd be very useful in severa
Hi all,
I have a little question on .
My problem is, that i want to insert values into a table and the type of
the values
are integer8.
I tried with but it doesnt work.
How can i use with longs?
Will this feature be added in further versions?
Is there a product which patches this problem? If no
Hi Terry,
Terry Kerr wrote:
>
> I am running a fairly high traffic Zope server where people occassionly ftp
> files in and out of the server.
>
> Approximately once per week, the zope process will go to using 99%CPU and stay
> like that untill it is restarted.
Since we've experienced identi
> I don't know OrderedFolder very well but it'd be very useful in several
> of my projects, so I can volunteer a bit of time in helping to get it
> in Zope 2.6 as well.
I'd rather see that you used your time to put Formulator into 2.6 :-P
/Magnus
__
Howdi.
On Wed, Mar 06, 2002 at 09:24:04AM +0100, Andre Schubert wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> I have a little question on .
> My problem is, that i want to insert values into a table and the type of
> the values
> are integer8.
> I tried with but it doesnt work.
> How can i use with longs?
> Will this
Hmmm ... i have been a bit to fast.
I wrapped my had around this, and found that long is
handled through the int, by simply stripping the "L"
of it (pythons string representation of long is 214321L ...)
so it get passed as a valid long string.
sorry for mixing things up ...
Greetings
Christ
>Hmmm ... i have been a bit to fast.
>I wrapped my had around this, and found that long is
>handled through the int, by simply stripping the "L"
>of it (pythons string representation of long is 214321L ...)
>so it get passed as a valid long string.
>
>sorry for mixing things up ...
Right, but w
Ive recently noticed that Zope doesnt change its working directory
when it starts up.
This has been a minor inconvenience for me recently when I wanted to
get a core dump from a long-running Zope, but its working directory
was set for somewhere that it couldnt write.
I know I could fix this in a
Ok. Let me see ... dideldimm ... ah right ... stupid thing
they remove the L and pass it to int() ... i will fix that.
On Wed, Mar 06, 2002 at 11:48:26AM +0100, Andre Schubert wrote:
> >Hmmm ... i have been a bit to fast.
> >I wrapped my had around this, and found that long is
> >handled throug
Firstly, I'm trying to return a lazy list to a dtml-in, but it seems
that the __getitems__ are all called up front This is the class and
the print statement shows up in debugging before any debugging output
from within the dtml-in:
class LazyList:
def __init__(self, root, selections):
Hi,
running Zope 2.5.1b1 and Python 2.1.2 with CMF 1.1, LDAPUserFolder 1.1,
CMFLDAP 1.2, CoreSessionTracking 0.9, DCWorkflow 0.4.1, CMFOptions 1.11, PIL
1.1.2, MySQL-python-0.9.0, python-ldap-1.10alpha3 (compiled with libldap
1.0.0 and liblber 1.0.0) on Linux Trustix 1.5 distribution, Zope crash a
> I don't know OrderedFolder very well but it'd be very useful in several
> of my projects, so I can volunteer a bit of time in helping to get it
> in Zope 2.6 as well.
Hi Martijn!
If you do so, please check with me for the newest version of Ordered Folder.
I have added a few features to Ordere
On Wed, 6 Mar 2002, Joachim Werner wrote:
> - All the basic API (like "store", "delete", "edit", ...) must be free of
> HTTP specifics, so that I can modifiy content either over a web frontend or
> over WebDAV, FTP, ... - and even via a "fat client" application like a
> wxPython application. Curr
Hi!
> That is Stephan's product, not mine, and it *may* have some issues in
> certain OS distributions (based on my experiences and another user's).
So,
> it cannot be added itself without some work--further testing work if
nothing
> else.
What kind of problems does OrderedFolder have? There is
On Wednesday 06 March 2002 07:27 am, Tim McLaughlin allegedly wrote:
> Firstly, I'm trying to return a lazy list to a dtml-in, but it seems
> that the __getitems__ are all called up front This is the class and
> the print statement shows up in debugging before any debugging output
> from with
Casey Duncan wrote:
>On Wednesday 06 March 2002 07:27 am, Tim McLaughlin allegedly wrote:
>
>>Firstly, I'm trying to return a lazy list to a dtml-in, but it seems
>>that the __getitems__ are all called up front This is the class and
>>the print statement shows up in debugging before any debu
This maybe more 2.6 (or even 2.5.1 final) fodder:
I notice that in a vanilla Zope install, Anonymous users are allowed access
through WebDAV. This is bad for two reasons:
1. From a security perspective this discloses way too much information about
your site to the outside world.
2. Due to vag
From: "Joachim Werner" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Hi!
>
> What kind of problems does OrderedFolder have? There is no OS-specific
code
> AFAIK. It is possible that there are browser-specific issues in the
> frontend. But those would be easy to fix ...
Hi :-)
In certain circumstances, if you install
Hi:
I would like to propose my "Paste Reference"/symlink hack for
inclusion into Zope 2.6
C U!
-- Mario Valente
___
Zope-Dev maillist - [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-dev
** No cross posts or HTML encodin
Casey Duncan wrote:
> This maybe more 2.6 (or even 2.5.1 final) fodder:
>
> I notice that in a vanilla Zope install, Anonymous users are allowed access
> through WebDAV. This is bad for two reasons:
>
> 1. From a security perspective this discloses way too much information about
> your site to
Would it be sufficient to disallow the PROPFIND for non-authenticated
users ?
- aj
- Original Message -
From: "Barry Pederson" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Wednesday, March 06, 2002 11:39
Subject: Re: [Zope-dev] WebDAV quibble -- fix in 2.6?
> Casey Duncan wrote:
>
Jean-Paul Smets wrote:
> I could find out that certain cookie names work, some others do not
>
> Works
>
> __ac_
> __ac_ra
> __ac_rak1
> __ac_nex1
> __ac_erp5
>
> Does not work
>
> __ac
> __ac_rack1
> __ac_rack12
>
> Really strange.
What browser are you using? Strange things like this happe
I think OrderedFolders is a great product and should be in the core ...
but does this also mean that TransparentFolder will get those parts
(that Shane mentioned some time ago) optimized that kept it from making
it into the core before?? If so ... sounds like a win-win situation.
__
On Wednesday 06 March 2002 04:58 am, Joachim Werner wrote:
> Hi!
>
> What I'd expect from Zope 2.6 depends a bit on when Zope 3 will be
> available.
>
> If we are talking about a couple of months, I'd prefer only having bug
> fixes in 2.5.x (and no 2.6 at all). If we are talking about more than ha
Is this a suggestion that TF go into the core? One other (major) problem
with TF is that it breaks session tracking site-wide, or at least the
ability to have more than one session id manager per Zope instance in CST;
I'm not sure about sessions in Zope 2.5...
TF seems to have too much normalcy-
On Wednesday 06 March 2002 02:49 pm, [EMAIL PROTECTED] allegedly wrote:
> Is this a suggestion that TF go into the core? One other (major) problem
> with TF is that it breaks session tracking site-wide, or at least the
> ability to have more than one session id manager per Zope instance in CST;
>
At 02:10 PM 3/6/2002 +0100, Jerome Alet wrote:
>On Wed, 6 Mar 2002, Joachim Werner wrote:
>
> > - All the basic API (like "store", "delete", "edit", ...) must be free of
> > HTTP specifics, so that I can modifiy content either over a web frontend or
> > over WebDAV, FTP, ... - and even via a "fat
At 10:40 AM 3/6/2002 -0500, you wrote:
>From: "Joachim Werner" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>
>
> > Hi!
> >
> > What kind of problems does OrderedFolder have? There is no OS-specific
>code
> > AFAIK. It is possible that there are browser-specific issues in the
> > frontend. But those would be easy to fix .
From: "Stephan Richter" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> If OF will make it in the core, the ZBabel stuff will be taken out of it
in
> anyway, since no part of Zope has something like that in it. I am also
> tempted to say that only the ordering module should go in (maybe the limit
> as well), since other fu
Casey Duncan wrote:
>
> Also Zope 3 will render TF superfluous.
As does the skins tool in the CMF.
I'm pretty sceptical on the whole OrderedFolder front too, IIRC, it does a lot
more than just provide ordered folders!
cheers,
Chris
___
Zope-Dev mai
Joachim Werner writes:
> - Storage should be completely separate from the data model. It should be
> possible to design a content class and then store it either in ZODB, the
> file system, an RDBMS or an LDAP server or whatever.
Isn't that already possible (implement your alternative storage
th
Jean-Paul Smets writes:
> I could find out that certain cookie names work, some others do not
>
> Works
>
> Really strange.
Could you use "tcpwatch" (or another TCP logger) to see whether
the Zope response contains the cookie header. If not, this would
be a Zope problem we could debug.
Terry Kerr writes:
> I am running a fairly high traffic Zope server where people occassionly ftp
> files in and out of the server.
>
> Approximately once per week, the zope process will go to using 99%CPU and stay
> like that untill it is restarted. The error shown in the stupid log file
- Original Message -
From: "Brian Lloyd" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Thursday, February 28, 2002 10:00
Subject: [Zope-Coders] Zope 2.6 planning - call for contributors!
> http://dev.zope.org/Resources/zope_260_plan.html
>
> I wholeheartedly
Stephan Richter wrote:
> If OF will make it in the core, the ZBabel stuff will be taken out of
> it in anyway, since no part of Zope has something like that in it. I
> am also tempted to say that only the ordering module should go in
> (maybe the limit as well), since other functionality seems
>I am afraid I must second this opinion. We recently looked at
>OrderedFolder, thinking to subclass it
>to produce our Slideshow product. The idea was to make a lightweight
>web-based replacement for PowerPoint
>where you can define the order of the slides and can hide/show them
>individual
Hi!
I'm implementing a simple db, using the same methods in the JobBoard
example. I looked at Kube, but I'd like something a bit more generic.
I'm trying to make add/edit forms and display pages as simple as
possible. Rather than have custom versions of all of these, each with
copies of the s
> Jean-Paul Smets wrote:
> > I could find out that certain cookie names work, some others do not
> >
> > Works
> >
> > __ac_
> > __ac_ra
> > __ac_rak1
> > __ac_nex1
> > __ac_erp5
> >
> > Does not work
> >
> > __ac
> > __ac_rack1
> > __ac_rack12
> >
> > Really strange.
>
> What browser are you usi
38 matches
Mail list logo