Evan Simpson wrote:
OK, I've checked in a sample implementation on evan-pathprefix-branch.
It allows for registering prefixes with:
from Products.PageTemplates.PathPrefixes import registerSubPathPrefix
registerSubPathPrefix('call', call_compiler, call_handler)
How would this interact with the
Shane Hathaway wrote:
Guys, that line of thinking is a distraction. ZPT authors ought to
learn Python.
I dunno about that, I would really like to see simple ZPT require no
understanding of python...
language again. If DTML used TALES expressions, it would be just as
clean as ZPT.
I actually
Jim Penny wrote:
Ahh, OK. The damned here/context semantic trap again. It is too late
to revisit, it is a done deed, it was a really good idea to call the
concept context, self, and here, depending on what kind of object you
are using, etc. But here suggests container more strongly to my mind
Andrew Sydelko wrote:
I've seen no problems with imports. And if anything, the cache
implementation in the ZODB3.1.2 version of ZEO made a remarkable
performance difference.
... as compared with earlier versions or later versions? I hope it's
getting faster, not slower. :-)
Shane
On Thu, 31 Jul 2003 8:49am, Shane Hathaway wrote:
Andrew Sydelko wrote:
I've seen no problems with imports. And if anything, the cache
implementation in the ZODB3.1.2 version of ZEO made a remarkable
performance difference.
... as compared with earlier versions or later versions? I hope it's
Andrew Sydelko wrote:
It's faster especially compared to ZEO 1.x, but also compared to earlier
versions of ZEO 2.x/ZEO from ZODB3.1.x.
At one point, changes were made to the initial cache invalidation check
that caused ZEO startup time to become significantly faster.
Before this change the ZEO
Hi all - sorry for the wide cross-posting, but I want to be sure
that the word gets out.
Starting today, we will be starting the transition of zope.org to
a new look and a new platform.
We plan to do the final content migration later today, so if you
are a frequent content contributor to
On Thu, Jul 31, 2003 at 10:06:08AM -0400, Shane Hathaway wrote:
Jim and PythonLabs put a bunch of work into optimizing ZEO cache
validation earlier this year, and now it's quite speedy.
Which reminds me... Is it expected that ZEO can take quite a while
to show a new object on all clients?
Paul Winkler wrote:
Which reminds me... Is it expected that ZEO can take quite a while
to show a new object on all clients?
With zope 2.6.2b3, ZEO 2.0.2, I can reliably get this behavior:
1) browser 1 looking at foofolder on client 1 adds a new object
/foofolder/bar.
2) browser 2 on client 2
I checked out Zope3 from CVS yesterday and had a go at it for the first
time. Granted that it is a work in progress, I did have a few comments
from a user's (rather than a developer's) perspective.
The API exposed to DTML and ZPT seems very sparse (compared to Zope2) at
this stage. Is this the
On Thu, Jul 31, 2003 at 12:13:40PM -0400, Shane Hathaway wrote:
This is clearly problematic. At what point is client 2 supposed to
see the new object??
Immediately. You are experiencing a bug. ;-)
OK... is this a known bug? Is it a bug in ZEO or Zope or what?
--
Paul Winkler
Chris Gray writes:
I checked out Zope3 from CVS yesterday and had a go at it for the first
time. Granted that it is a work in progress, I did have a few comments
from a user's (rather than a developer's) perspective.
Thanks for taking the time to look at Zope 3! We definately
appreciate
Paul Winkler wrote:
On Thu, Jul 31, 2003 at 12:13:40PM -0400, Shane Hathaway wrote:
This is clearly problematic. At what point is client 2 supposed to
see the new object??
Immediately. You are experiencing a bug. ;-)
OK... is this a known bug? Is it a bug in ZEO or Zope or what?
I've seen
Chris Withers wrote:
How would this interact with the Adapters stuff implements in Zope 3's
TALES?
It wouldn't -- this is a Zope 2 implementation. OK, I know what you
mean, but I don't know enough about the Zope 3 implementation to make an
informed response. Wouldn't Zope 2's lack of the
On Thu, 31 Jul 2003, Fred L. Drake, Jr. wrote:
Chris Gray writes:
but I see one problems. The text
input appears at the top of the list and the button to commit the change
is at the bottom of the list. This will become more inconvenient as a
15 matches
Mail list logo
