Ok, and sorry for being so poorly informed.
We gave a try to ubuntu 9 last week, and we can't work with it: our zope
application uses several other packages that are no longer supported (nor
installed) with python 2.4. So this is a sensitive subject.
Congratulations to all for all this outstandin
Lennart Regebro wrote:
> Or, we could release 2.12 soon, and then start working on 2.13, a
> version that explicitly is for people who want to move towards the
> Zope Toolkit, and may not be completely backward compatible.
This would be my vote.
Chris
--
Simplistix - Content Management, Zope &
On 28.04.2009 9:13 Uhr, Christophe Tronche wrote:
> Ok, and sorry for being so poorly informed.
>
> We gave a try to ubuntu 9 last week, and we can't work with it: our
zope application uses several other packages that are no longer
supported (nor installed) with python 2.4. So this is a sensitive s
Chris Withers wrote:
> Lennart Regebro wrote:
>> Or, we could release 2.12 soon, and then start working on 2.13, a
>> version that explicitly is for people who want to move towards the
>> Zope Toolkit, and may not be completely backward compatible.
>
> This would be my vote.
Right now the story f
Roger Ineichen wrote:
>> Betreff: Re: [Zope-dev] [Checkins] SVN: zope.publisher/trunk/
>> Added some BBB code to setDefaultSkin
>> I don't mind if the skinnable story gets less intermingled
>> with the request story in a new zope.skinnable package and
>> breaks some backwards compatibility at t
Previously Martijn Faassen wrote:
> Hey Jim, others,
>
> Jim Fulton wrote:
>
> [__file__ in setup.py]
>
> > Stop talking about this. :)
> >
> > This is almost certainly a buildout bug that I'll fix.
>
> Just making sure we have some clear conclusions in this thread...
>
> Do we have a buildou
My 2 cents:
Zope 2.12 will go into beta state as soon as ZODB 3.9.0
goes beta. The underlying Zope 3 packages are stable and good enough
right - I don't care much right now about having an official Zope Toolkit
Release 1.0. If this will happen soon: fine - otherwise we will stay
with the current Z
2009/4/27 Chris McDonough :
> On 4/27/09 3:27 PM, Laurence Rowe wrote:
>>
>> Martin Aspeli wrote:
>>>
>>> Laurence Rowe wrote:
Martin Aspeli wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> First - a quick question: can we treat __name__ and id/getId()/_setId()
> as the same, always? OFS.SimpleItem
Summary of messages to the zope-tests list.
Period Mon Apr 27 12:00:00 2009 UTC to Tue Apr 28 12:00:00 2009 UTC.
There were 8 messages: 8 from Zope Tests.
Tests passed OK
---
Subject: OK : Zope-2.10 Python-2.4.6 : Linux
From: Zope Tests
Date: Mon Apr 27 20:50:44 EDT 2009
URL: http://
On Tue, Apr 28, 2009 at 09:58, Hanno Schlichting wrote:
> 1. The stable option also looses us support for newer Python versions.
> It is only very recently that packages got full deprecation warning less
> support for Python 2.5 and 2.6. With Zope 3.4 we are stuck with Python 2.4.
I haven't run o
On 28.04.2009 15:02 Uhr, Lennart Regebro wrote:
> On Tue, Apr 28, 2009 at 09:58, Hanno Schlichting wrote:
>
>> 1. The stable option also looses us support for newer Python versions.
>> It is only very recently that packages got full deprecation warning less
>> support for Python 2.5 and 2.6. Wi
Hi,
I'm using z3c.recipe.sphinxdoc to generate documentation for a
project. Sphinx has some very useful extensions like
'sphinx.ext.autodoc' and 'sphinx.ext.doctest' and I would like to use
both extensions in my 'docs' part. Especially the autodoc function is
useful when creating API docs.
I would
I'm not familiar with your process of implementing new features, but
the attached patch adds such option to z3c.recipe.sphinxdoc, comments
welcome.
Markus
Index: CHANGES.txt
===
--- CHANGES.txt (Revision 99557)
+++ CHANGES.txt (Arbeit
On 28.04.2009 15:25 Uhr, Tres Seaver wrote:
> ml
>
> These tests are breaking because a much newer version of zope.component
> (3.7.0) is being installed than the on called out in the Zope 2 index[1]
> (3.5.1). That version is older than the one in the Zope 2
> versions.cfg[1] (3.6.0).
>
> [1] htt
Hey,
In order to get to a conclusion:
I haven't seen convincing arguments yet *not* to drop the Python 2.4 for
new releases of the Zope Toolkit libraries.
I'd like to phrase the debate in those terms instead of the reverse,
because ensuring Python 2.4 compatibility is an additional burden for
Hi Markus.
Stephan Richter and Paul Cardune are the people I would expect to
manage this package. I expect they'll get back to you soonish. On
freenode #zope3-dev they are srichter and pcardune, IIRC.
The feature and the diff look reasonable to me. Normally we want
tests in our diffs, bu
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hanno Schlichting wrote:
> Chris Withers wrote:
>> Lennart Regebro wrote:
>>> Or, we could release 2.12 soon, and then start working on 2.13, a
>>> version that explicitly is for people who want to move towards the
>>> Zope Toolkit, and may not be comp
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Martijn Faassen wrote:
> Hey,
>
> In order to get to a conclusion:
>
> I haven't seen convincing arguments yet *not* to drop the Python 2.4 for
> new releases of the Zope Toolkit libraries.
>
> I'd like to phrase the debate in those terms instead o
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Andreas Jung wrote:
> On 28.04.2009 15:25 Uhr, Tres Seaver wrote:
>> ml
>>
>> These tests are breaking because a much newer version of zope.component
>> (3.7.0) is being installed than the on called out in the Zope 2 index[1]
>> (3.5.1). That version
On Tue, Apr 28, 2009 at 16:51, Tres Seaver wrote:
>
>
> >>
> >> [1] http://download.zope.org/Zope2/index/2.12.0a4/zope.component/
> >>
> >> [2] http://svn.zope.org/Zope/trunk/versions.cfg?rev=99525&view=auto
> >
> >
> > Hanno updated versions.cfg two days ago.
>
> OK, so the index isn't being aut
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Andreas Jung wrote:
> On Tue, Apr 28, 2009 at 16:51, Tres Seaver wrote:
>
>>
[1] http://download.zope.org/Zope2/index/2.12.0a4/zope.component/
[2] http://svn.zope.org/Zope/trunk/versions.cfg?rev=99525&view=auto
>>>
>>> Hanno updated ve
On 28.04.2009 17:41 Uhr, Tres Seaver wrote:
> Andreas Jung wrote:
> > On Tue, Apr 28, 2009 at 16:51, Tres Seaver
> wrote:
>
> >>
> [1] http://download.zope.org/Zope2/index/2.12.0a4/zope.component/
>
> [2] http://svn.zope.org/Zope/trunk/versions.cfg?rev=99525&view=auto
> >>>
> >>> Ha
Hi folks,
I've written a small Google App Engine application to help manage and
publish buildout configuration that provide a known good [versions] block.
I'm not sure this approach is good, and the application is not well
tested, but it may be of interest to some people here.
http://good-py.a
On Sun, 2009-04-19 at 16:32 +0200, Lennart Regebro wrote:
>
> I'm getting really tired of this discussion, and also that nobody
> comment either positively or negatively on what I write, but just
> seems to ignore it, which is frustrating, as it makes me think I'm
> completely right but nobody gets
On Thu, Apr 23, 2009 at 08:01:36AM +0200, Christian Theune wrote:
> On Fri, 2009-04-03 at 01:37 +0300, Marius Gedminas wrote:
> > Incidentally, I've a long-standing wish to be able to register browser
> > views in ZCML using the adapter directive.
> >
> > class MyFineView(BrowserPage):
> >
On Wed, 2009-04-29 at 00:59 +0200, Marius Gedminas wrote:
> On Thu, Apr 23, 2009 at 08:01:36AM +0200, Christian Theune wrote:
> > On Fri, 2009-04-03 at 01:37 +0300, Marius Gedminas wrote:
> > > Incidentally, I've a long-standing wish to be able to register browser
> > > views in ZCML using the adap
26 matches
Mail list logo
