Re: [Zope-dev] [Checkins] SVN: zc.buildout/ Moved to github

2012-08-18 Thread Jens Vagelpohl

On Aug 19, 2012, at 0:01 , Alex Clark  wrote:

> Hi Jens,
> 
> On 2012-08-18 07:49:59 +, Jens Vagelpohl said:
> 
>> Hi Alex,
>> Please revert this checkin. You can't just take core software pieces from 
>> Zope Foundation-hosted repositories and move them somewhere else.
>> Thanks!
> 
> I think you are confused. I would suggest you ask Jim Fulton about it, as he 
> moved Buildout to GitHub months ago. Both 1.6.x and 2.x are under active 
> development there.



Again, there's a confusion about perceived and legal ownership.

jens


___
Zope-Dev maillist  -  Zope-Dev@zope.org
https://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-dev
**  No cross posts or HTML encoding!  **
(Related lists -
 https://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-announce
 https://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope )


Re: [Zope-dev] [Checkins] SVN: zc.buildout/ Moved to github

2012-08-18 Thread Jens Vagelpohl

On Aug 18, 2012, at 21:46 , Lennart Regebro  wrote:

> Yes, but my question is why this changes with github.

GitHub is a third party infrastructure run by other people. I cannot ascertain 
how well it enforces our requirement that all checkins must be from signed 
contributors only. Furthermore, I cannot ascertain that private contributor 
data remains private (email addresses etc). And since it becomes ever easier to 
accept code from unknown sources (e.g. pull requests) legal code ownership 
becomes an issue again.

jens


___
Zope-Dev maillist  -  Zope-Dev@zope.org
https://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-dev
**  No cross posts or HTML encoding!  **
(Related lists -
 https://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-announce
 https://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope )


Re: [Zope-dev] [Checkins] SVN: zc.buildout/ Moved to github

2012-08-18 Thread Alex Clark

Hi,

On 2012-08-19 01:24:31 +, Lennart Regebro said:


On Sat, Aug 18, 2012 at 11:03 PM, Tres Seaver  wrote:

Because the ability to check into svn.zope.org is based on a "chain of
custody" managed by the ZF (web account, verified e-mail address, and SSH
key).  J. Random Hacker's account on Github has no such chain.


Sure, but Random J Hacker shouldn't have write permission to the
repository, so I don't understand why that makes a difference.



IANAL but from my perspective the legitimate issue here is that Domen 
Kožar has not signed the Zope Contributor's Agreement, but Jim has 
added him to the Buildout organization on GitHub and he has been 
committing fixes. If I were the ZF, I would either:


- Make sure everyone in any ZF organizations on GitHub (e.g. buildout) 
has signed the contributor agreement, or
- Declare that nothing on GitHub (or at least in the buildout 
organization) is a valid contribution to "the work".


In either case, AFAICT zc.buildout development has stopped on 
svn.zope.org and started on GitHub so let us let the commit stand to 
reflect this real world circumstance.




Alex





//Lennart
___
Zope-Dev maillist  -  Zope-Dev@zope.org
https://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-dev
**  No cross posts or HTML encoding!  **
(Related lists -
 https://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-announce
 https://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope )



--
Alex Clark · http://pythonpackages.com___
Zope-Dev maillist  -  Zope-Dev@zope.org
https://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-dev
**  No cross posts or HTML encoding!  **
(Related lists -
 https://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-announce
 https://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope )


Re: [Zope-dev] [Checkins] SVN: zc.buildout/ Moved to github

2012-08-18 Thread Lennart Regebro
On Sat, Aug 18, 2012 at 11:03 PM, Tres Seaver  wrote:
> Because the ability to check into svn.zope.org is based on a "chain of
> custody" managed by the ZF (web account, verified e-mail address, and SSH
> key).  J. Random Hacker's account on Github has no such chain.

Sure, but Random J Hacker shouldn't have write permission to the
repository, so I don't understand why that makes a difference.

//Lennart
___
Zope-Dev maillist  -  Zope-Dev@zope.org
https://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-dev
**  No cross posts or HTML encoding!  **
(Related lists -
 https://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-announce
 https://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope )


[Zope-dev] zope-tests - FAILED: 114, OK: 15

2012-08-18 Thread Zope tests summarizer
This is the summary for test reports received on the 
zope-tests list between 2012-08-17 00:00:00 UTC and 2012-08-18 00:00:00 UTC:

See the footnotes for test reports of unsuccessful builds.

An up-to date view of the builders is also available in our 
buildbot documentation: 
http://docs.zope.org/zopetoolkit/process/buildbots.html#the-nightly-builds

Reports received


   Zope-2.10 Python-2.4.6 : Linux
   Zope-2.11 Python-2.4.6 : Linux
   Zope-2.12 Python-2.6.8 : Linux
   Zope-2.13 Python-2.6.8 : Linux
   Zope-2.13 Python-2.7.3 : Linux
   Zope-trunk Python-2.6.8 : Linux
   Zope-trunk Python-2.7.3 : Linux
[1]winbot / ZODB_dev py_265_win32
[2]winbot / ZODB_dev py_265_win64
[3]winbot / ZODB_dev py_270_win32
[4]winbot / ZODB_dev py_270_win64
[5]winbot / z3c.form_py_265_32
[6]winbot / z3c.ptcompat_py_265_32
[7]winbot / zc.catalog_py_265_32
[8]winbot / zc.configuration_py_265_32
[9]winbot / zc.lockfile_py_265_32
[10]   winbot / zc.monitor_py_265_32
[11]   winbot / zc.ngi_py_265_32
[12]   winbot / zc.queue_py_265_32
[13]   winbot / zc.sourcefactory_py_265_32
[14]   winbot / zc.table_py_265_32
[15]   winbot / zope.annotation_py_265_32
[16]   winbot / zope.app.applicationcontrol_py_265_32
[17]   winbot / zope.app.appsetup_py_265_32
[18]   winbot / zope.app.authentication_py_265_32
[19]   winbot / zope.app.basicskin_py_265_32
[20]   winbot / zope.app.broken_py_265_32
[21]   winbot / zope.app.component_py_265_32
[22]   winbot / zope.app.container_py_265_32
[23]   winbot / zope.app.content_py_265_32
[24]   winbot / zope.app.debug_py_265_32
[25]   winbot / zope.app.dependable_py_265_32
[26]   winbot / zope.app.error_py_265_32
[27]   winbot / zope.app.exception_py_265_32
[28]   winbot / zope.app.folder_py_265_32
[29]   winbot / zope.app.form_py_265_32
[30]   winbot / zope.app.generations_py_265_32
[31]   winbot / zope.app.http_py_265_32
[32]   winbot / zope.app.i18n_py_265_32
[33]   winbot / zope.app.interface_py_265_32
[34]   winbot / zope.app.locales_py_265_32
[35]   winbot / zope.app.localpermission_py_265_32
[36]   winbot / zope.app.pagetemplate_py_265_32
[37]   winbot / zope.app.principalannotation_py_265_32
[38]   winbot / zope.app.publication_py_265_32
[39]   winbot / zope.app.publisher_py_265_32
[40]   winbot / zope.app.renderer_py_265_32
[41]   winbot / zope.app.rotterdam_py_265_32
[42]   winbot / zope.app.schema_py_265_32
[43]   winbot / zope.app.security_py_265_32
[44]   winbot / zope.app.server_py_265_32
[45]   winbot / zope.app.session_py_265_32
[46]   winbot / zope.app.testing_py_265_32
[47]   winbot / zope.app.wsgi_py_265_32
[48]   winbot / zope.app.zcmlfiles_py_265_32
[49]   winbot / zope.app.zopeappgenerations_py_265_32
[50]   winbot / zope.applicationcontrol_py_265_32
[51]   winbot / zope.authentication_py_265_32
[52]   winbot / zope.browser_py_265_32
[53]   winbot / zope.browsermenu_py_265_32
[54]   winbot / zope.browserpage_py_265_32
[55]   winbot / zope.browserresource_py_265_32
[56]   winbot / zope.cachedescriptors_py_265_32
[57]   winbot / zope.catalog_py_265_32
[58]   winbot / zope.component_py_265_32
[59]   winbot / zope.componentvocabulary_py_265_32
[60]   winbot / zope.configuration_py_265_32
[61]   winbot / zope.container_py_265_32
[62]   winbot / zope.contentprovider_py_265_32
[63]   winbot / zope.contenttype_py_265_32
[64]   winbot / zope.copy_py_265_32
[65]   winbot / zope.copypastemove_py_265_32
[66]   winbot / zope.datetime_py_265_32
[67]   winbot / zope.deferredimport_py_265_32
[68]   winbot / zope.deprecation_py_265_32
[69]   winbot / zope.dottedname_py_265_32
[70]   winbot / zope.error_py_265_32
[71]   winbot / zope.event_py_265_32
[72]   winbot / zope.exceptions_py_265_32
[73]   winbot / zope.filerepresentation_py_265_32
[74]   winbot / zope.formlib_py_265_32
[75]   winbot / zope.generations_py_265_32
[76]   winbot / zope.hookable_py_265_32
[77]   winbot / zope.i18n_py_265_32
[78]   winbot / zope.i18nmessageid_py_265_32
[79]   winbot / zope.index_py_265_32
[80]   winbot / zope.interface_py_265_32
[81]   winbot / zope.intid_py_265_32
[82]   winbot / zope.keyreference_py_265_32
[83]   winbot / zope.lifecycleevent_py_265_32
[84]   winbot / zope.location_py_265_32
[85]   winbot / zope.login_py_265_32
[86]   winbot / zope.mimetype_py_265_32
[87]   winbot / zope.minmax_py_265_32
[88]   winbot / zope.pagetemplate_py_265_32
[89]   winbot / zope.password_py_265_32
[90]   winbot / zope.pluggableauth_py_265_32
[91]   winbot / zope.principalannotation_py_265_32
[92]   winbot / zope.principalregistry_py_265_32
[93]   winbot / zope.processlifetime_py_265_32
[94]   winbot / zope.proxy_py_265_32
[95]   winbot / zope.ptresource_py_265_32
[96]   winbot / zope.publisher_py_265_32
[97]   winbot / zope.ramcache_py_265_32
[98]   winbot / zope.schema_py_265_32
[99]   winbot / zope.security_py_265_32
[100]  winbot / zope.securitypolicy_py_265_32
[101]  winbot / zope.sendmail_py_265_32
[102]  winbot / zope.sequencesort_py_265_32

Re: [Zope-dev] [Checkins] SVN: zc.buildout/ Moved to github

2012-08-18 Thread Alex Clark

Hi

On 2012-08-18 22:01:51 +, Alex Clark said:


Hi Jens,

On 2012-08-18 07:49:59 +, Jens Vagelpohl said:


Hi Alex,

Please revert this checkin. You can't just take core software pieces
from Zope Foundation-hosted repositories and move them somewhere else.

Thanks!




I think you are confused. I would suggest you ask Jim Fulton about it,
as he moved Buildout to GitHub months ago. Both 1.6.x and 2.x are under
active development there.


Further, I committed the *message* about the move and I removed trunk
to avoid confusion, I didn't personally move anything (Jim moved 2.x
and Domen Kožar moved trunk to the 1.6.x branch).


Also please see the distutils-sig list for more information about
recent zc.buildout 1.6.x development.




And… sorry. Using a new client and I missed the ongoing thread :-)



Alex








Alex






jens



On Aug 18, 2012, at 3:09 , J. Alexander Clark  wrote:


Log message for revision 127519:
Moved to github


Changed:
A   zc.buildout/README_MOVED_TO_GITHUB.txt
D   zc.buildout/trunk/

-=-
Added: zc.buildout/README_MOVED_TO_GITHUB.txt
===
--- zc.buildout/README_MOVED_TO_GITHUB.txt  (rev 0)
+++ zc.buildout/README_MOVED_TO_GITHUB.txt  2012-08-18 01:09:06 UTC (rev 
127519)
@@ -0,0 +1 @@
+https://github.com/buildout/buildout/tree/1.6.x

___
checkins mailing list
check...@zope.org
https://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/checkins


___
Zope-Dev maillist  -  Zope-Dev@zope.org
https://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-dev
**  No cross posts or HTML encoding!  **
(Related lists -
https://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-announce
https://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope )



--
Alex Clark · http://pythonpackages.com


___
Zope-Dev maillist  -  Zope-Dev@zope.org
https://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-dev
**  No cross posts or HTML encoding!  **
(Related lists -
https://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-announce
https://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope )


Re: [Zope-dev] [Checkins] SVN: zc.buildout/ Moved to github

2012-08-18 Thread Alex Clark

Hi Jens,

On 2012-08-18 07:49:59 +, Jens Vagelpohl said:


Hi Alex,

Please revert this checkin. You can't just take core software pieces 
from Zope Foundation-hosted repositories and move them somewhere else.


Thanks!




I think you are confused. I would suggest you ask Jim Fulton about it, 
as he moved Buildout to GitHub months ago. Both 1.6.x and 2.x are under 
active development there.



Further, I committed the *message* about the move and I removed trunk 
to avoid confusion, I didn't personally move anything (Jim moved 2.x 
and Domen Kožar moved trunk to the 1.6.x branch).



Also please see the distutils-sig list for more information about 
recent zc.buildout 1.6.x development.




Alex






jens



On Aug 18, 2012, at 3:09 , J. Alexander Clark  wrote:


Log message for revision 127519:
Moved to github


Changed:
A   zc.buildout/README_MOVED_TO_GITHUB.txt
D   zc.buildout/trunk/

-=-
Added: zc.buildout/README_MOVED_TO_GITHUB.txt
===
--- zc.buildout/README_MOVED_TO_GITHUB.txt  (rev 0)
+++ zc.buildout/README_MOVED_TO_GITHUB.txt  2012-08-18 01:09:06 UTC (rev 
127519)
@@ -0,0 +1 @@
+https://github.com/buildout/buildout/tree/1.6.x

___
checkins mailing list
check...@zope.org
https://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/checkins


___
Zope-Dev maillist  -  Zope-Dev@zope.org
https://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-dev
**  No cross posts or HTML encoding!  **
(Related lists -
 https://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-announce
 https://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope )



--
Alex Clark · http://pythonpackages.com


___
Zope-Dev maillist  -  Zope-Dev@zope.org
https://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-dev
**  No cross posts or HTML encoding!  **
(Related lists -
https://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-announce
https://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope )


Re: [Zope-dev] [Checkins] SVN: zc.buildout/ Moved to github

2012-08-18 Thread Tres Seaver
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1

On 08/18/2012 03:18 PM, Jens Vagelpohl wrote:
> But removing stuff from svn.zope.org requires approval from you as
> the original owner *and* the ZF as legal co-owner of anything stored
> on svn.zope.org.

Actually, it requires the permission of the ZF.  The original owner has
no more say in it than any other contributor:  her rights are purely to
incorporate forks (of her contributions) into non-ZPL'ed software.



Tres.
- -- 
===
Tres Seaver  +1 540-429-0999  tsea...@palladion.com
Palladion Software   "Excellence by Design"http://palladion.com
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.4.11 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/

iEYEARECAAYFAlAwA6wACgkQ+gerLs4ltQ4l+wCgxrYPGdrpBDnlts3Vp1D4wDDp
6+UAoKf8hEYjQOTwfzGmHGMkjZS1bgNy
=pWcR
-END PGP SIGNATURE-

___
Zope-Dev maillist  -  Zope-Dev@zope.org
https://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-dev
**  No cross posts or HTML encoding!  **
(Related lists -
 https://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-announce
 https://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope )


Re: [Zope-dev] [Checkins] SVN: zc.buildout/ Moved to github

2012-08-18 Thread Tres Seaver
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1

On 08/18/2012 03:46 PM, Lennart Regebro wrote:
> On Sat, Aug 18, 2012 at 9:36 PM, Jens Vagelpohl  
> wrote:
>> 
>> The contributor agreement requires you as the contributor to be able
>> to enter into the contract with the Zope Foundation transferring one
>> half ownership to the Zope Foundation. You can only enter into this
>> contract if you own (as in "wrote") the code yourself - you cannot
>> assign ownership to someone else for something you don't fully own.
>> 
>> The goal of these contractual requirements is to make sure software
>>  stored in the Zope Foundation is as "clean" as possible from an 
>> ownership standpoint. People who use code from svn.zope.org have a 
>> reasonable assurance that no third party will show up on your 
>> doorstep demanding money or license fees for code that third party 
>> claims to own.
>> 
>> I've just recently seen what can happen for projects not following 
>> this kind of strict policy: The python-ldap package developers are 
>> unable to e.g. assign a new license to their code because since they
>> don't hold any ownership and would need to ask every single 
>> developer who ever touched that code - an impossible task. For us 
>> that kind of issue does not arise.
> 
> Yes, but my question is why this changes with github.

Because the ability to check into svn.zope.org is based on a "chain of
custody" managed by the ZF (web account, verified e-mail address, and SSH
key).  J. Random Hacker's account on Github has no such chain.


Tres.
- -- 
===
Tres Seaver  +1 540-429-0999  tsea...@palladion.com
Palladion Software   "Excellence by Design"http://palladion.com
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.4.11 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/

iEYEARECAAYFAlAwAwgACgkQ+gerLs4ltQ7/wwCgpdrjdb1ER6P7FS3lqO91FlwO
ucQAnRpbKzABEIXDrDg5vsgJcCxz7DNX
=0tGk
-END PGP SIGNATURE-

___
Zope-Dev maillist  -  Zope-Dev@zope.org
https://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-dev
**  No cross posts or HTML encoding!  **
(Related lists -
 https://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-announce
 https://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope )


Re: [Zope-dev] [Checkins] SVN: zc.buildout/ Moved to github

2012-08-18 Thread Lennart Regebro
On Sat, Aug 18, 2012 at 9:36 PM, Jens Vagelpohl  wrote:
>
> On Aug 18, 2012, at 15:46 , Lennart Regebro  wrote:
>
>> On Sat, Aug 18, 2012 at 10:39 AM, Jens Vagelpohl  wrote:
>>> Legally this must be a fork then and I'm not sure it can be released as 
>>> official Zope Foundation software anymore if you make releases from GitHub. 
>>> Reason: the ZF can no longer ascertain that only official ZF contributor 
>>> agreement signers have modified code in the package, which is a core 
>>> requirement for software released from Zope Foundation repositories/under 
>>> Zope Foundation auspices.
>>
>> Is this because of the support for merging pull requests? Is that
>> really legally different than a contributor making a merge from a
>> patch?
>
> Hi Lennart,
>
> The contributor agreement requires you as the contributor to be able to enter 
> into the contract with the Zope Foundation transferring one half ownership to 
> the Zope Foundation. You can only enter into this contract if you own (as in 
> "wrote") the code yourself - you cannot assign ownership to someone else for 
> something you don't fully own.
>
> The goal of these contractual requirements is to make sure software stored in 
> the Zope Foundation is as "clean" as possible from an ownership standpoint. 
> People who use code from svn.zope.org have a reasonable assurance that no 
> third party will show up on your doorstep demanding money or license fees for 
> code that third party claims to own.
>
> I've just recently seen what can happen for projects not following this kind 
> of strict policy: The python-ldap package developers are unable to e.g. 
> assign a new license to their code because since they don't hold any 
> ownership and would need to ask every single developer who ever touched that 
> code - an impossible task. For us that kind of issue does not arise.

Yes, but my question is why this changes with github.

//Lennart
___
Zope-Dev maillist  -  Zope-Dev@zope.org
https://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-dev
**  No cross posts or HTML encoding!  **
(Related lists -
 https://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-announce
 https://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope )


Re: [Zope-dev] [Checkins] SVN: zc.buildout/ Moved to github

2012-08-18 Thread Jens Vagelpohl

On Aug 18, 2012, at 15:46 , Lennart Regebro  wrote:

> On Sat, Aug 18, 2012 at 10:39 AM, Jens Vagelpohl  wrote:
>> Legally this must be a fork then and I'm not sure it can be released as 
>> official Zope Foundation software anymore if you make releases from GitHub. 
>> Reason: the ZF can no longer ascertain that only official ZF contributor 
>> agreement signers have modified code in the package, which is a core 
>> requirement for software released from Zope Foundation repositories/under 
>> Zope Foundation auspices.
> 
> Is this because of the support for merging pull requests? Is that
> really legally different than a contributor making a merge from a
> patch?

Hi Lennart,

The contributor agreement requires you as the contributor to be able to enter 
into the contract with the Zope Foundation transferring one half ownership to 
the Zope Foundation. You can only enter into this contract if you own (as in 
"wrote") the code yourself - you cannot assign ownership to someone else for 
something you don't fully own.

The goal of these contractual requirements is to make sure software stored in 
the Zope Foundation is as "clean" as possible from an ownership standpoint. 
People who use code from svn.zope.org have a reasonable assurance that no third 
party will show up on your doorstep demanding money or license fees for code 
that third party claims to own.

I've just recently seen what can happen for projects not following this kind of 
strict policy: The python-ldap package developers are unable to e.g. assign a 
new license to their code because since they don't hold any ownership and would 
need to ask every single developer who ever touched that code - an impossible 
task. For us that kind of issue does not arise.

jens


___
Zope-Dev maillist  -  Zope-Dev@zope.org
https://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-dev
**  No cross posts or HTML encoding!  **
(Related lists -
 https://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-announce
 https://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope )


Re: [Zope-dev] [Checkins] SVN: zc.buildout/ Moved to github

2012-08-18 Thread Jens Vagelpohl

On Aug 18, 2012, at 14:31 , Jean-Paul Smets  wrote:

> Hi,
> 
> I approve your position Jens. 
> 
> Moving to git can make sense. Moving to github as primary platform does not 
> make sense.

Hi Jean-Paul,

Technical pros and cons are valid arguments, correct, but that wasn't my point 
here. I'm trying to look at the contractual issues involved, that's all. 

I'm not saying "only platform X is acceptable", just that right now I only have 
proof that our self-hosted Subversion repositories on svn.zope.org appear to 
meet all the legal requirements laid out by the contributor agreements and the 
role of the Zope Foundation as the guard of these contributions as well as 
contributors' private data held by the Zope Foundation.

jens


___
Zope-Dev maillist  -  Zope-Dev@zope.org
https://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-dev
**  No cross posts or HTML encoding!  **
(Related lists -
 https://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-announce
 https://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope )


Re: [Zope-dev] [Checkins] SVN: zc.buildout/ Moved to github

2012-08-18 Thread Jens Vagelpohl

On Aug 18, 2012, at 12:46 , Wichert Akkerman  wrote:

> On 2012-8-18 10:39, Jens Vagelpohl wrote:
>> Hi Hanno,
>> 
>> Legally this must be a fork then and I'm not sure it can be released as 
>> official Zope Foundation software anymore if you make releases from GitHub.
> 
> Doesn't the name zc.buildout imply that it is a Zope Corp project instead of 
> a Zope Foundation one? The author has also never been listed as the 
> foundation but Jim personally, which seems to imply zc.buildout never was 
> Zope Foundation-owned software.

Hi Wichert,

Clearly, Jim is the "father" of that software and it has been developed in 
large part for Zope Corporation, hence the name "zc.buildout". However, that's 
not all there is to "ownership" of code on svn.zope.org.

If you read the contributor agreements[1] all committers to svn.zope.org 
signed, submitting code to svn.zope.org also meant you entered into a legal 
agreement with the Zope Foundation regarding that code. Code submitted to 
svn.zope.org is from that moment on half-owned by the Zope Foundation. That 
means you cannot unilaterally just declare code removed from svn.zope.org, 
which is my point about the last checkin to the zc.buildout package. Everyone 
is free to fork code. But removing stuff from svn.zope.org requires approval 
from you as the original owner *and* the ZF as legal co-owner of anything 
stored on svn.zope.org.

Caveat: I'm not a lawyer, that's just how I interpret the contributor agreement.

jens

[1] http://foundation.zope.org/agreements/ZopeFoundation_Committer_Agreement



___
Zope-Dev maillist  -  Zope-Dev@zope.org
https://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-dev
**  No cross posts or HTML encoding!  **
(Related lists -
 https://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-announce
 https://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope )


Re: [Zope-dev] [Checkins] SVN: zc.buildout/ Moved to github

2012-08-18 Thread Lennart Regebro
On Sat, Aug 18, 2012 at 10:39 AM, Jens Vagelpohl  wrote:
> Legally this must be a fork then and I'm not sure it can be released as 
> official Zope Foundation software anymore if you make releases from GitHub. 
> Reason: the ZF can no longer ascertain that only official ZF contributor 
> agreement signers have modified code in the package, which is a core 
> requirement for software released from Zope Foundation repositories/under 
> Zope Foundation auspices.

Is this because of the support for merging pull requests? Is that
really legally different than a contributor making a merge from a
patch?

//Lennart
___
Zope-Dev maillist  -  Zope-Dev@zope.org
https://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-dev
**  No cross posts or HTML encoding!  **
(Related lists -
 https://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-announce
 https://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope )


Re: [Zope-dev] [Checkins] SVN: zc.buildout/ Moved to github

2012-08-18 Thread Charlie Clark

Am 18.08.2012, 15:35 Uhr, schrieb Chris Withers :

I'm not going to dignify this with a fuller response other than to say  
that Jean-Paul Smets' entire email is nothing but bullshit written to  
try and promote an inferior competing product.


The issues of hosting and vcs were aired a few months ago and should be  
considered separately.


The T&C's of any of the these products should be read carefully and I, for  
one, do not like the indemnification clause at Github. I would, therefore,  
agree with Jean-Paul in this respect.


I agree with Jens, that new work should be considered as a fork. It  
currently feels very much cloak & dagger.


Charlie
--
Charlie Clark
Managing Director
Clark Consulting & Research
German Office
Kronenstr. 27a
Düsseldorf
D- 40217
Tel: +49-211-600-3657
Mobile: +49-178-782-6226
___
Zope-Dev maillist  -  Zope-Dev@zope.org
https://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-dev
**  No cross posts or HTML encoding!  **
(Related lists -
https://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-announce
https://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope )


Re: [Zope-dev] [Checkins] SVN: zc.buildout/ Moved to github

2012-08-18 Thread Chris Withers
I'm not going to dignify this with a fuller response other than to say 
that Jean-Paul Smets' entire email is nothing but bullshit written to 
try and promote an inferior competing product ;-)


Chris

On 18/08/2012 13:31, Jean-Paul Smets wrote:

Hi,

I approve your position Jens.

Moving to git can make sense. Moving to github as primary platform does
not make sense.

Github is a proprietary platform. There is really no justification in
using a proprietary platform for open source projects, especially
considering that many open source alternatives exist and that nothing
prevents from using github as a mirror (for marketing purpose for example).

It is not only depressing to see open source communities not eating
their own dog food but also irresponsible.

It is irresponsible because Cloud / SaaS is far from reliable. Please
read this to get an idea.
(http://iwgcr.org/paris-university-and-telecom-paristech-publish-availability-ranking-of-world-cloud-computing/).
Service outages are not rare.

It is irresponsible because it sends a message to the market that open
source is not competitive (else open source communities would use it for
themselves). Many open source git hosting solutions do exist (incl.
gitorious, gitlab, indefero). Why not use them ?

On a more positive side, Nexedi is currently sponsoring the port of
Gitlab (http://gitlabhq.com/) open source git platform to SlapOS (
http://www.slapos.org/) open source Cloud. This means that there will in
a few days a python based, Zope based, buildout based and fully
resilient platform to host open source projects, with the ability to
manage copies of source code on servers all around the world in a true
community fashion.

And after reading today's message, I got so upset that I decided that
Nexedi will use SlapOS to offer hosting to any open source Zope
community project which believes enough in open source values to use
open source tools rather than proprietary ones. This will include free
support to any open source Zope project willing to manage its own SlapOS
platform rather rely on ours. Let us see if Zope community will be the
first or the last to eat its own dog food ;-).

Regards,

JPS.
Nexedi CEO

PS. I do not mind behind hated for using the word "irresponsible",
whooever took the decision to use github. I do mean it.

Le 18/08/2012 09:49, Jens Vagelpohl a écrit :

Hi Alex,

Please revert this checkin. You can't just take core software pieces from Zope 
Foundation-hosted repositories and move them somewhere else.

Thanks!

jens



On Aug 18, 2012, at 3:09 , J. Alexander Clark  wrote:


Log message for revision 127519:
  Moved to github


Changed:
  A   zc.buildout/README_MOVED_TO_GITHUB.txt
  D   zc.buildout/trunk/

-=-
Added: zc.buildout/README_MOVED_TO_GITHUB.txt
===
--- zc.buildout/README_MOVED_TO_GITHUB.txt  (rev 0)
+++ zc.buildout/README_MOVED_TO_GITHUB.txt  2012-08-18 01:09:06 UTC (rev 
127519)
@@ -0,0 +1 @@
+https://github.com/buildout/buildout/tree/1.6.x

___
checkins mailing list
check...@zope.org
https://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/checkins

___
Zope-Dev maillist  -Zope-Dev@zope.org
https://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-dev
**  No cross posts or HTML encoding!  **
(Related lists -
  https://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-announce
  https://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope  )




__
This email has been scanned by the Symantec Email Security.cloud service.
For more information please visit http://www.symanteccloud.com
__


___
Zope-Dev maillist  -  Zope-Dev@zope.org
https://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-dev
**  No cross posts or HTML encoding!  **
(Related lists -
  https://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-announce
  https://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope )



--
Simplistix - Content Management, Batch Processing & Python Consulting
   - http://www.simplistix.co.uk
___
Zope-Dev maillist  -  Zope-Dev@zope.org
https://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-dev
**  No cross posts or HTML encoding!  **
(Related lists -
https://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-announce
https://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope )


Re: [Zope-dev] [Checkins] SVN: zc.buildout/ Moved to github

2012-08-18 Thread Chris Withers

Hi Jens,

On 18/08/2012 09:39, Jens Vagelpohl wrote:

Legally this must be a fork then and I'm not sure it can be released as 
official Zope Foundation software anymore if you make releases from GitHub. 
Reason: the ZF can no longer ascertain that only official ZF contributor 
agreement signers have modified code in the package,


Actually, with the cryptographically signed nature of git commits, I'm 
not sure this is true...



which is a core requirement for software released from Zope Foundation 
repositories/under Zope Foundation auspices.


Well, I guess releases would be made outside of these auspices then, 
whatever that means... The license looks the same, the same people are 
doing the development.


Quite frankly, given the hard time we have getting people to help out, 
anything that eases that can only be a good thing. Chris McDonough and 
the rest of the Pyramid folk seem happy enough with the GitHub model, 
and I've found it's made life very much easier for the python-excel 
project and the other packages I maintain.



Apart from those legal points which are still not entirely clear, since this can only be 
a fork I would say that last checkin must still be reverted. Don't get me wrong, I'm not 
trying to be facetious, but until those legal questions are cleared up you should not 
make any checkins on svn.zope.org that basically "shut down" development of 
that package from there, such as deleting the trunk.


No history has been destroyed, it's just a clear marker of where active 
development is happening. That said, I don't have a strong opinion on 
this, I'd suggest Jim just makes the call...


cheers,

Chris

--
Simplistix - Content Management, Batch Processing & Python Consulting
   - http://www.simplistix.co.uk
___
Zope-Dev maillist  -  Zope-Dev@zope.org
https://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-dev
**  No cross posts or HTML encoding!  **
(Related lists -
https://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-announce
https://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope )


Re: [Zope-dev] [Checkins] SVN: zc.buildout/ Moved to github

2012-08-18 Thread Jean-Paul Smets

Hi,

I approve your position Jens.

Moving to git can make sense. Moving to github as primary platform does 
not make sense.


Github is a proprietary platform. There is really no justification in 
using a proprietary platform for open source projects, especially 
considering that many open source alternatives exist and that nothing 
prevents from using github as a mirror (for marketing purpose for example).


It is not only depressing to see open source communities not eating 
their own dog food but also irresponsible.


It is irresponsible because Cloud / SaaS is far from reliable. Please 
read this to get an idea. 
(http://iwgcr.org/paris-university-and-telecom-paristech-publish-availability-ranking-of-world-cloud-computing/). 
Service outages are not rare.


It is irresponsible because it sends a message to the market that open 
source is not competitive (else open source communities would use it for 
themselves). Many open source git hosting solutions do exist (incl. 
gitorious, gitlab, indefero). Why not use them ?


On a more positive side, Nexedi is currently sponsoring the port of 
Gitlab (http://gitlabhq.com/) open source git platform to SlapOS ( 
http://www.slapos.org/) open source Cloud. This means that there will in 
a few days a python based, Zope based, buildout based and fully 
resilient platform to host open source projects, with the ability to 
manage copies of source code on servers all around the world in a true 
community fashion.


And after reading today's message, I got so upset that I decided that 
Nexedi will use SlapOS to offer hosting to any open source Zope 
community project which believes enough in open source values to use 
open source tools rather than proprietary ones. This will include free 
support to any open source Zope project willing to manage its own SlapOS 
platform rather rely on ours. Let us see if Zope community will be the 
first or the last to eat its own dog food ;-).


Regards,

JPS.
Nexedi CEO

PS. I do not mind behind hated for using the word "irresponsible", 
whooever took the decision to use github. I do mean it.


Le 18/08/2012 09:49, Jens Vagelpohl a écrit :

Hi Alex,

Please revert this checkin. You can't just take core software pieces from Zope 
Foundation-hosted repositories and move them somewhere else.

Thanks!

jens



On Aug 18, 2012, at 3:09 , J. Alexander Clark  wrote:


Log message for revision 127519:
  Moved to github


Changed:
  A   zc.buildout/README_MOVED_TO_GITHUB.txt
  D   zc.buildout/trunk/

-=-
Added: zc.buildout/README_MOVED_TO_GITHUB.txt
===
--- zc.buildout/README_MOVED_TO_GITHUB.txt  (rev 0)
+++ zc.buildout/README_MOVED_TO_GITHUB.txt  2012-08-18 01:09:06 UTC (rev 
127519)
@@ -0,0 +1 @@
+https://github.com/buildout/buildout/tree/1.6.x

___
checkins mailing list
check...@zope.org
https://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/checkins

___
Zope-Dev maillist  -Zope-Dev@zope.org
https://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-dev
**  No cross posts or HTML encoding!  **
(Related lists -
  https://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-announce
  https://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope  )



___
Zope-Dev maillist  -  Zope-Dev@zope.org
https://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-dev
**  No cross posts or HTML encoding!  **
(Related lists -
 https://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-announce
 https://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope )


Re: [Zope-dev] [Checkins] SVN: zc.buildout/ Moved to github

2012-08-18 Thread Fred Drake
On Sat, Aug 18, 2012 at 6:46 AM, Wichert Akkerman  wrote:
> Doesn't the name zc.buildout imply that it is a Zope Corp project instead of
> a Zope Foundation one? The author has also never been listed as the
> foundation but Jim personally, which seems to imply zc.buildout never was
> Zope Foundation-owned software.

Jim *wrote* the software (and is therefore the author, regardless of who *owns*
it), and gave it to the Zope Foundation under his contributor's agreement.
Therefore, the Foundation and Zope Corporation both have equal ownership stakes.


  -Fred

-- 
Fred L. Drake, Jr.
"A person who won't read has no advantage over one who can't read."
   --Samuel Langhorne Clemens
___
Zope-Dev maillist  -  Zope-Dev@zope.org
https://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-dev
**  No cross posts or HTML encoding!  **
(Related lists -
 https://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-announce
 https://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope )


Re: [Zope-dev] [Checkins] SVN: zc.buildout/ Moved to github

2012-08-18 Thread Wichert Akkerman

On 2012-8-18 10:39, Jens Vagelpohl wrote:

Hi Hanno,

Legally this must be a fork then and I'm not sure it can be released as 
official Zope Foundation software anymore if you make releases from GitHub.


Doesn't the name zc.buildout imply that it is a Zope Corp project 
instead of a Zope Foundation one? The author has also never been listed 
as the foundation but Jim personally, which seems to imply zc.buildout 
never was Zope Foundation-owned software.


Wichert.

--
Wichert AkkermanIt is simple to make things.
http://www.wiggy.net/  It is hard to make things simple.
___
Zope-Dev maillist  -  Zope-Dev@zope.org
https://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-dev
**  No cross posts or HTML encoding!  **
(Related lists -
https://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-announce
https://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope )


Re: [Zope-dev] [Checkins] SVN: zc.buildout/ Moved to github

2012-08-18 Thread Jens Vagelpohl
Hi Hanno,

Legally this must be a fork then and I'm not sure it can be released as 
official Zope Foundation software anymore if you make releases from GitHub. 
Reason: the ZF can no longer ascertain that only official ZF contributor 
agreement signers have modified code in the package, which is a core 
requirement for software released from Zope Foundation repositories/under Zope 
Foundation auspices.

Apart from those legal points which are still not entirely clear, since this 
can only be a fork I would say that last checkin must still be reverted. Don't 
get me wrong, I'm not trying to be facetious, but until those legal questions 
are cleared up you should not make any checkins on svn.zope.org that basically 
"shut down" development of that package from there, such as deleting the trunk.

jens



On Aug 18, 2012, at 10:21 , Hanno Schlichting  wrote:

> Please note that development of buildout 2 happens on github since April this 
> year. The buildout developers decided to do the move after Jim suggested it.
> 
> Legally you could see this move as a fork, but it was done by Jim and others. 
> Alex just wanted to clarify the situation and also move the development of 
> the stable branch into the same place.
> 
> Hanno
> 
> On 18.08.2012, at 09:49, Jens Vagelpohl  wrote:
> 
>> Hi Alex,
>> 
>> Please revert this checkin. You can't just take core software pieces from 
>> Zope Foundation-hosted repositories and move them somewhere else.
>> 
>> Thanks!
>> 
>> jens
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> On Aug 18, 2012, at 3:09 , J. Alexander Clark  wrote:
>> 
>>> Log message for revision 127519:
>>> Moved to github
>>> 
>>> 
>>> Changed:
>>> A   zc.buildout/README_MOVED_TO_GITHUB.txt
>>> D   zc.buildout/trunk/
>>> 
>>> -=-
>>> Added: zc.buildout/README_MOVED_TO_GITHUB.txt
>>> ===
>>> --- zc.buildout/README_MOVED_TO_GITHUB.txt(rev 
>>> 0)
>>> +++ zc.buildout/README_MOVED_TO_GITHUB.txt2012-08-18 01:09:06 UTC (rev 
>>> 127519)
>>> @@ -0,0 +1 @@
>>> +https://github.com/buildout/buildout/tree/1.6.x
>>> 
>>> ___
>>> checkins mailing list
>>> check...@zope.org
>>> https://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/checkins
>> 
>> ___
>> Zope-Dev maillist  -  Zope-Dev@zope.org
>> https://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-dev
>> **  No cross posts or HTML encoding!  **
>> (Related lists -
>> https://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-announce
>> https://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope )

___
Zope-Dev maillist  -  Zope-Dev@zope.org
https://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-dev
**  No cross posts or HTML encoding!  **
(Related lists -
 https://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-announce
 https://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope )


Re: [Zope-dev] [Checkins] SVN: zc.buildout/ Moved to github

2012-08-18 Thread Hanno Schlichting
Please note that development of buildout 2 happens on github since April this 
year. The buildout developers decided to do the move after Jim suggested it.

Legally you could see this move as a fork, but it was done by Jim and others. 
Alex just wanted to clarify the situation and also move the development of the 
stable branch into the same place.

Hanno

On 18.08.2012, at 09:49, Jens Vagelpohl  wrote:

> Hi Alex,
> 
> Please revert this checkin. You can't just take core software pieces from 
> Zope Foundation-hosted repositories and move them somewhere else.
> 
> Thanks!
> 
> jens
> 
> 
> 
> On Aug 18, 2012, at 3:09 , J. Alexander Clark  wrote:
> 
>> Log message for revision 127519:
>> Moved to github
>> 
>> 
>> Changed:
>> A   zc.buildout/README_MOVED_TO_GITHUB.txt
>> D   zc.buildout/trunk/
>> 
>> -=-
>> Added: zc.buildout/README_MOVED_TO_GITHUB.txt
>> ===
>> --- zc.buildout/README_MOVED_TO_GITHUB.txt(rev 0)
>> +++ zc.buildout/README_MOVED_TO_GITHUB.txt2012-08-18 01:09:06 UTC (rev 
>> 127519)
>> @@ -0,0 +1 @@
>> +https://github.com/buildout/buildout/tree/1.6.x
>> 
>> ___
>> checkins mailing list
>> check...@zope.org
>> https://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/checkins
> 
> ___
> Zope-Dev maillist  -  Zope-Dev@zope.org
> https://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-dev
> **  No cross posts or HTML encoding!  **
> (Related lists -
> https://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-announce
> https://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope )
___
Zope-Dev maillist  -  Zope-Dev@zope.org
https://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-dev
**  No cross posts or HTML encoding!  **
(Related lists -
 https://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-announce
 https://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope )


Re: [Zope-dev] [Checkins] SVN: zc.buildout/ Moved to github

2012-08-18 Thread Jens Vagelpohl
Hi Alex,

Please revert this checkin. You can't just take core software pieces from Zope 
Foundation-hosted repositories and move them somewhere else.

Thanks!

jens



On Aug 18, 2012, at 3:09 , J. Alexander Clark  wrote:

> Log message for revision 127519:
>  Moved to github
> 
> 
> Changed:
>  A   zc.buildout/README_MOVED_TO_GITHUB.txt
>  D   zc.buildout/trunk/
> 
> -=-
> Added: zc.buildout/README_MOVED_TO_GITHUB.txt
> ===
> --- zc.buildout/README_MOVED_TO_GITHUB.txt(rev 0)
> +++ zc.buildout/README_MOVED_TO_GITHUB.txt2012-08-18 01:09:06 UTC (rev 
> 127519)
> @@ -0,0 +1 @@
> +https://github.com/buildout/buildout/tree/1.6.x
> 
> ___
> checkins mailing list
> check...@zope.org
> https://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/checkins

___
Zope-Dev maillist  -  Zope-Dev@zope.org
https://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-dev
**  No cross posts or HTML encoding!  **
(Related lists -
 https://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-announce
 https://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope )