On Sat, Sep 14, 2013, at 0:38, Baiju M wrote:
Is there any roadmap release plan for Zope 4.0 ?
I'm not aware on anyone still working on Zope 4. The project might come
back to life at some point, but for the past couple of months it's been
very quiet.
At my work, we use Zope 2.12 and we are
Hi.
On behalf of the Zope Toolkit release team and the Zope community, I'm
happy to announce the release of the Zope Toolkit 1.0.8 and 1.1.6.
Both releases are minor bugfix releases.
To use the new releases, you can use:
[buildout]
extends =
Hi.
I made a first alpha release of the current ZTK master, which
technically just means there's a stable version file at:
http://download.zope.org/zopetoolkit/index/2.0a1/ztk-versions.cfg
and an overview page at:
http://docs.zope.org/zopetoolkit/releases/overview-2.0a1.html
I hope this will
On Mon, Mar 4, 2013 at 8:00 PM, Stephan Richter
stephan.rich...@gmail.com wrote:
So my question is: What do we want to do? I would suggest E-mails on status
change should be sufficient.
Cool, but please change the default email notification, it's set to
spam everyone all the time. See
On Thu, Feb 28, 2013 at 8:00 AM, Marius Gedminas mar...@gedmin.as wrote:
On Thu, Feb 28, 2013 at 01:00:02AM +, Zope tests summarizer wrote:
[3]UNKNOWN : Zope-trunk Python-2.6.8 : Linux
[4]UNKNOWN : Zope-trunk Python-2.7.3 : Linux
Something new:
Zope-trunk Python-2.6.8 :
On Thu, Feb 28, 2013 at 2:43 PM, Stephan Richter
stephan.rich...@gmail.com wrote:
I would like to deprecate zope.sequencesort in ZTK 2.0, since it cannot
properly ported to Python 3, since it depends heavily on the cmp() way of
sorting. I am also not a user of the package and I only tried to
On Wed, Feb 27, 2013 at 5:04 PM, Sebastien Douche sdou...@gmail.com wrote:
2. z3c.recipe.compattest and zc.recipe.testrunner doesn't work with Buildout
2.
Both do now. You currently need z3c.recipe.compattest from trunk though.
I updated the ZTK trunk in the last days, and most of it should
Hi.
The process for a ZTK 2.0 release isn't really well defined. I'm not
sure if Jan-Wijbrand and Christophe are still interested in working on
ZTK releases.
Contrary to wait I said before I'd be willing to work on a ZTK 2.0
release (knowing the tools and procedure).
My goals for a 2.0 release
On Tue, Feb 26, 2013 at 6:12 PM, Stephan Richter
stephan.rich...@gmail.com wrote:
Could you outline what the first step would be to create an alpha release list
for 2.0? We could manually include an sdist of the ZODB 4 py3 branch to make
the tests pass under Python 3.
I'll have to look at the
The buildout 1.6.x branch was renamed to 1. Jim discussed and announced
that on the buildout-development list.
Please follow-up on that list for buildout issues.
Hanno
On Fri, Jan 11, 2013 at 1:51 PM, Patrick Gerken do3cc...@googlemail.comwrote:
Hi,
I thought I have was part of the
Hi.
Sorry, but 2.13 is in bug-fix-only mode. At least as long as I have to do
the release management for it.
Trunk is fair game, or up to Leonardo really.
Hanno
On Fri, Jan 11, 2013 at 2:09 PM, Wichert Akkerman wich...@wiggy.net wrote:
I want to use INameChooser to select the id of copied
On Thu, Jan 10, 2013 at 3:59 PM, Jim Fulton j...@zope.com wrote:
On Thu, Jan 10, 2013 at 9:50 AM, Jens Vagelpohl j...@dataflake.org
wrote:
I did not choose to include or exclude any branch. The test migration
uses the package used to migrate most Plone packages from SVN to GitHub,
which
Hi.
The change looks ok. But I think you broke an optimization. IIRC the code
compares the old and new values for the index, and skips the indexing step
if they are the same. The typical item.reindexObject() call sents data for
all indexes, even if just one or two them have changed. The
On Mon, Sep 10, 2012 at 10:31 AM, yuppie y.2...@wcm-solutions.de wrote:
CMF uses some ZTUtils in restricted code: Batch, LazyFilter, make_query and
SimpleTreeMaker. The new Zope 2 releases (2.12.24 and 2.13.17) are not
compatible with existing CMF releases. Is this intended?
This wasn't
On Wed, Aug 29, 2012 at 3:25 PM, Tres Seaver tsea...@palladion.com wrote:
That base class has been gone since ZConfig 2.9.2. I don't think the
Zope2 trunk has pinned / unpinned ZConfig in a long time, so I'm not sure
why it would just now break (ZConfig 2.9.2 was released in February, and
On Thu, Aug 23, 2012 at 5:23 PM, li...@nidelven-it.no wrote:
does this have any security implications?
In short: No.
Long answer: Not unless you have very custom code similar to what's in
the provided test (providing a custom rolesForPermissionOn callable on
a class). And that code would have
On Wed, Aug 22, 2012 at 3:00 PM, Yusei TAHARA yu...@domen.cx wrote:
I found a bug in ZopeSecurityPolicy and fixed it.
http://svn.zope.org/AccessControl/trunk/src/AccessControl/ZopeSecurityPolicy.py?rev=127548r1=113657r2=127548
Is it possible to release new version?
I can do that. But is
The Plone Foundation adopted a policy for this, see
http://plone.org/foundation/materials/foundation-resolutions/patch-policy-052011
As we don't have any terms of service stating so for any of our issue trackers,
we don't get any copyright assignments for reported bugs or proposed patches.
Please note that development of buildout 2 happens on github since April this
year. The buildout developers decided to do the move after Jim suggested it.
Legally you could see this move as a fork, but it was done by Jim and others.
Alex just wanted to clarify the situation and also move the
On Tue, Jul 10, 2012 at 7:29 AM, yuppie y.2...@wcm-solutions.de wrote:
Zope 2 has customized implementations of the ``browser:view`` and
``browser:page`` directives. I tried to make that code more similar to
zope.browserpage without breaking Zope 2 and CMF. I guess the biggest change
I made
On Tue, Jul 3, 2012 at 1:56 PM, Jan-Wijbrand Kolman
janwijbr...@gmail.com wrote:
At the end of this post, I pasted the diff from the current zope.intid
trunk against your fork on bitbucket. Maybe this would make it easier
for others to comment on it?
It would be easier to read if you did the
On Wed, Jun 6, 2012 at 5:06 PM, Paul J Stevens p...@nfg.nl wrote:
FYI, I'm using the following buildout:
https://github.com/pjstevns/plone.mongrel2
You are missing some required middleware for the current un-documented
WSGI feature. I made an experiment quite a while back and came up
with:
On Wed, Jun 6, 2012 at 7:06 PM, Tres Seaver tsea...@palladion.com wrote:
On 06/06/2012 12:11 PM, Hanno Schlichting wrote:
I've looked into WSGI again at the Plone Symposium East sprint and I
think we should remove the middleware approach again for Zope2.
Primarily as we loose some features
Hi.
On behalf of the Zope Toolkit release team and the Zope community, I'm
happy to announce the release of the Zope Toolkit 1.0.7 and 1.1.5.
Both releases are minor bugfix releases.
To use the new releases, you can use:
[buildout]
extends =
On Sun, May 27, 2012 at 3:39 PM, Tres Seaver tsea...@palladion.com wrote:
On 05/26/2012 09:00 PM, Zope tests summarizer wrote:
Non-OK results --
Yay!
Indeed!
I updated the ZTK 1.0/1.1 branches to the latest respective bugfix releases.
If the buildbots stay green, I'll tag new
On Tue, May 22, 2012 at 4:32 AM, Patrick Gerken do3cc...@googlemail.com wrote:
Well, the question is, is there still a need for ztk 1.0 tests? If so,
who are the consumers and for how long should we run the tests for
1.0?
Zope 2.13 is based on the ZTK 1.0. There's no version of Zope 2 that
On Thu, May 10, 2012 at 6:49 PM, Tres Seaver tsea...@palladion.com wrote:
Can we please decomission the winbot until somebody has time to fix it?
The false negatives could be masking real problems.
I tried to reproduce the problem manually on the winbot, but my remote
connection died every 10
On Wed, May 2, 2012 at 3:40 PM, Adam GROSZER agroszer...@gmail.com wrote:
or why that package gets included
Adding zc.sourcefactory to the ZTK was a conscious choice. It was
popular and often used in Zope 3-style projects, maybe even part of
core Grok and BlueBream.
We could remove it from ZTK
On Fri, Apr 27, 2012 at 3:18 PM, Adam GROSZER agroszer...@gmail.com wrote:
On 04/27/2012 02:58 PM, Patrick Gerken wrote:
There still seem to be processes hanging on the windows boxes,
unfortunately.
restarted the whole box
if this happens again then something is wrong with the tests lately
On Fri, Apr 20, 2012 at 4:03 AM, Tres Seaver tsea...@palladion.com wrote:
On 04/19/2012 09:00 PM, Zope tests summarizer wrote:
[2] UNKNOWN UNKNOWN : winbot / ztk_dev py_265_win64
https://mail.zope.org/pipermail/zope-tests/2012-April/060786.html
Ditto. Maybe that box needs an intervention?
On Wed, Apr 11, 2012 at 1:13 PM, Jeff Rush jr...@taupro.com wrote:
I'm chasing a problem when trying to use zope.sessions with Zope 2.12.x, and
I'm beginning to think that they are an incompatible mix of Zope2 and Zope3
technologies.
Can anyone confirm either way, so I know whether I'm
On Mon, Apr 9, 2012 at 10:33 PM, Tres Seaver tsea...@palladion.com wrote:
Persistent component registries are not a good enough reason to add such
coupling (I'd be in favor of splitting support for persistent registries
out of zope.component, too, while we're at it).
Let's put the broken
On Tue, Mar 27, 2012 at 2:53 PM, Patrick Gerken do3cc...@googlemail.com wrote:
I found out, somewhat surprised, that __parent__ pointers are just
disguised aq_parent pointers.
Are you maybe trying to use or set __parent__ on Acquisition wrappers
instead of unwrapped objects?
AQ wrappers have
On Tue, Mar 27, 2012 at 3:50 PM, Patrick Gerken do3cc...@googlemail.com wrote:
Hmm, since I didn't understand what magic happens with __parent__ pointers,
I tried the following in pdb:
unwrapped = aq_base(a)
unwrapped.__parent__ = aq_base(a.__parent__)
So I stored a not acquisition wrapped
On Wed, Mar 21, 2012 at 6:58 PM, Marius Gedminas mar...@gedmin.as wrote:
For packages that have C extension modules there are probably extra
steps needed to produce Windows binary eggs. I don't know those
steps (winbot is involved somehow), so I avoid making releases of
packages
On Thu, Mar 15, 2012 at 1:22 PM, Tres Seaver tsea...@palladion.com wrote:
On 03/14/2012 09:00 PM, Zope tests summarizer wrote:
[1] FAILED winbot / ztk_dev py_265_win32
https://mail.zope.org/pipermail/zope-tests/2012-March/059300.html
[2] FAILED winbot / ztk_dev py_265_win64
On Thu, Mar 15, 2012 at 5:39 PM, Marius Gedminas mar...@gedmin.as wrote:
On Thu, Mar 15, 2012 at 03:40:25PM +0100, Hanno Schlichting wrote:
z.a.publication added a new requirement for ZODB3=3.10. But ZODB on
its 3.10 branch notes its version as 3.10dev.
Eh? That implies that 3.10
On Mon, Mar 12, 2012 at 10:55 PM, Marius Gedminas mar...@gedmin.as wrote:
http://pypi.python.org/pypi/ZODB3/3.10.5 contains various proper win32
eggs in addition to that .win32.zip. The PyPI page for 3.10.4 did not
have any weird .win32.zip files.
Can someone please remove that dumb binary
On Thu, Mar 1, 2012 at 1:42 PM, Vincent Fretin vincent.fre...@gmail.com wrote:
Did you look how http://pypi.python.org/pypi/plone.app.async have done the
integration with Zope2?
IIRC we (Jarn) ran into the same problem when running p.a.async. Our
solution was to switch to using SIGINT for
On Tue, Feb 14, 2012 at 2:23 PM, Sebastien Douche sdou...@gmail.com wrote:
Cool! Any news for for the trunk? Any chance to see a ZTK 2.0?
I'm not involved in ZTK discussions beyond 1.1 or Zope 2 discussions
beyond 2.13.
But even as a bystander I haven't seen anyone talk about such a
release or
Hi.
On behalf of the Zope Toolkit release team and the Zope community, I'm
happy to announce the release of the Zope Toolkit 1.0.6 and 1.1.4.
Both releases are minor bugfix releases.
To use the new releases, you can use:
[buildout]
extends =
On Mon, Feb 13, 2012 at 2:12 PM, Joshua Immanuel j...@hipro.co.in wrote:
Wonderful!!. It would be very helpful if there is a changelog associated
with it. So, that we can know the important changes that have taken
place in associated packages.
Sure, that would be helpful. Unfortunately nobody
On Wed, Feb 8, 2012 at 10:07 AM, Gediminas Paulauskas mene...@pov.lt wrote:
The majority of failures are in zope.testrunner, due to recent update
of versions. The offending one is testtools 0.9.13. With testtools
0.9.12 the tests pass.
Thanks for looking at those.
I hopefully fixed the Zope 4
On Mon, Feb 6, 2012 at 4:41 PM, Martijn Faassen faas...@startifact.com wrote:
I would actually argue that Zope4 have no real release cycle at all:
instead, the individual pieces which make up Zope should have their own
cycles, with perhaps a ZTK-like tracking set that Plone and others use as
Hi.
I just updated the ZTK 1.0 and 1.1 branches to all latest bugfix versions.
I'll give the buildbots until Wednesday to build and find any real
problems. If there's no problems, I'll cut new ZTK 1.0.x and 1.1.x
releases later this week.
If you have any other bugfixes you want to get into
Hi.
I just updated the 2.12.x branch with one last batch of bugfix
versions. I'll let the buildbots run and if there's no troubles
release one more version later this week.
I consider this to be the last maintenance release for the 2.12.x
series. From now on 2.12.x will only see security
On Tue, Jan 24, 2012 at 2:14 PM, li...@nidelven-it.no wrote:
It used to work, but with the most recent versions of
Zope this error appears if the Undo by date is used
more than once:
The undo API has changed with ZODB 3.10. As noted in the changelog:
The API for undoing multiple transactions
On Thu, Dec 8, 2011 at 8:34 AM, Michael Howitz m...@gocept.com wrote:
[3] FAILED winbot / ZODB_dev py_254_win32
https://mail.zope.org/pipermail/zope-tests/2011-December/053803.html
Same errors like yesterday due to incompatibles with Python 2.4 reps. 2.5.
I think I managed to remove
Hi.
On behalf of the Zope Toolkit release team and the Zope community, I'm
happy to announce the release of the Zope Toolkit 1.0.5 and 1.1.3.
Both releases are minor bugfix releases. A schedule for a ZTK 1.2
release is unknown at this point.
To use the new release, you can use:
[buildout]
On Mon, Nov 7, 2011 at 9:01 AM, Michael Howitz m...@gocept.com wrote:
after having the buildbots green again, I think it would be a good point in
time for a series new ZTK releases:
* 1.0.5 (yes, there are even on the 1.0 branch version updates),
* 1.1.3,
* 1.2c1 (a new release branch from
Hi.
A couple of us came together before the Plone conference to work on
various Zope related topics. We worked on the following areas:
- storing parent pointers (elro, davisagli): we have a branch of Zope
that changes OFS to store parent pointers and fixed the issues that
arose in copy/cut/paste
On Thu, Oct 27, 2011 at 6:26 PM, David Glick davidgl...@groundwire.org wrote:
On 10/27/11 9:05 AM, Jim Fulton wrote:
Is there a more formal announcement anywhere? Is there a description
of what it is envisioned to be?
That came out of this thread on zope-dev back in July:
On Thu, Oct 27, 2011 at 6:44 PM, Tres Seaver tsea...@palladion.com wrote:
[12] FAILED winbot / z3c.form_py_265_32
https://mail.zope.org/pipermail/zope-tests/2011-October/051752.html
Same failure as yesterday: perhaps it ran before Hanno's pinning fix.
Yep. There's two green builds for
On Mon, Oct 24, 2011 at 5:08 PM, Tres Seaver tsea...@palladion.com wrote:
I also prefer that we drop 2.5 compatibility on the ZTK trunk. The
2.5.6 release page says[1]:
This release is most likely the final release of Python 2.5; under
the current release policy, no security issues in
On Sat, Oct 22, 2011 at 9:41 PM, Tres Seaver tsea...@palladion.com wrote:
#10 - 20 omitted: perma-failing z3c.* tests esse delendam!
I disabled the z3c.* tests on the winbot now. If someone has time to
reconfigure it, so those are only run but don't sent out mail
notifications - please go
On Mon, Oct 17, 2011 at 8:05 PM, Laurence Rowe l...@lrowe.co.uk wrote:
Should we migrate the recipe to github and get a free issue tracker?
Ok. I've started the SVN to Git migration. Repo will be at
https://github.com/hannosch/collective.recipe.solrinstance and anyone
who has recently committed
On Mon, Oct 17, 2011 at 11:19 AM, Andreas Jung li...@zopyx.com wrote:
I used the single-core example for the solrinstance recipe:
I think someone reported the Solr core examples to be broken in the
latest releases. I don't use the core-variants myself, though.
Without an issue tracker, it's
On Mon, Oct 10, 2011 at 11:12 AM, Ruslan Mahmatkhanov cvs-...@yandex.ru wrote:
And this is breaks packaging on FreeBSD, since there will be no
before_and_after27.py[c,o] and security_in_syntax27.py[c,o] that we
expecting.
I know that this files included conditionally, but easy_install still
://plone.org/products/plone/security/advisories/20110928.
On behalf of the Zope security response team,
Hanno Schlichting
___
Zope-Dev maillist - Zope-Dev@zope.org
https://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-dev
** No cross posts or HTML encoding
On Sat, Sep 24, 2011 at 4:25 PM, Adam Groszer agros...@gmail.com wrote:
Something is totally borked there.
http://winbot.zope.org/builders/wineggbuilder/builds/13939/steps/release%20eggs/logs/stdio
I took a look and fixed the problem. It came down to a missing version
pin for BeautifulSoup and
On Thu, Sep 22, 2011 at 9:03 AM, Chris McDonough chr...@plope.com wrote:
I've made tags for zope.interface 3.8.0 and zope.component 3.11.0, as
described in a recent thread to this list, but I don't have PyPI owner
rights to publish them. Can someone add me to the owners list for those
On Thu, Sep 22, 2011 at 10:21 AM, Ruslan Mahmatkhanov cvs-...@yandex.ru wrote:
Can anybody reproduce this?
Yes, it's a known bug reported at https://bugs.launchpad.net/zope2/+bug/838978
Patches are very welcome for this.
Hanno
___
Zope-Dev maillist
On Wed, Sep 21, 2011 at 12:45 PM, Babylakshmi Muthusamy
babylakshmim...@gmail.com wrote:
Please suggest me a solution for this.
Please post your question to the users mailing list at
https://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope
This mailing list is for the development of Zope, not development
Hi.
On Sat, Sep 10, 2011 at 11:32 PM, Chris McDonough chr...@plope.com wrote:
Could you delete and readd the failed repository enlistments at
https://www.ohloh.net/p/zope/enlistments?page=13
Tried that - had no effect as it indeed recognized the old urls. So I
removed them and added them
On Mon, Sep 5, 2011 at 1:09 AM, Chris McDonough chr...@plope.com wrote:
I've given Python 3 support to zope.deprecation at
http://svn.zope.org/zope.deprecation/branches/chrism-unittesting/
- Which Python versions is this thing meant to support? I have it
functioning under 2.5, 2.6, 2.7 (and
On Wed, Aug 31, 2011 at 9:17 AM, Wolfgang Schnerring w...@gocept.com wrote:
Splitting zope.configuration into core mechanics and ZCML support
makes a lot of sense to me.
So, +1 from me.
+1 here too
Hanno
___
Zope-Dev maillist - Zope-Dev@zope.org
On Fri, Aug 19, 2011 at 7:14 PM, Tres Seaver tsea...@palladion.com wrote:
[1] UNKNOWN FAILED (errors=1) : Zope-2.13-alltests Python-2.6.6 :
Linux
https://mail.zope.org/pipermail/zope-tests/2011-August/048315.html
I think this failure is due to recent acquisition grubbing::
Error in test
On Wed, Aug 17, 2011 at 8:12 AM, Adam GROSZER agros...@gmail.com wrote:
On Tue, 16 Aug 2011 22:50:42 -0400 you wrote:
- - Merge the 'jbohman-zope.registry' branch of zope.component to the
trunk, and bump its minor version accordingly.
Great work, +1 on merging (I trust the GSoC mentor did
On Mon, Aug 15, 2011 at 12:27 PM, Sylvain Viollon sylv...@infrae.com wrote:
I have this problem with:
- Python 2.6 and Zope 2.12
- Python 2.7 and Zope 2.13
(All the latest ones).
This have been observed on 64 bits computers (Mac OS X, FreeBSD and Linux).
I don't know about 32
On Sat, Aug 13, 2011 at 3:55 AM, Stephan Richter
srich...@cipherhealth.com wrote:
On Friday, August 12, 2011, Tres Seaver wrote:
Thoughts?
+1. Sounds like a good plan.
+2 :)
Hanno
___
Zope-Dev maillist - Zope-Dev@zope.org
On Sat, Aug 13, 2011 at 11:33 AM, Malthe Borch mbo...@gmail.com wrote:
I will merge this branch if there are no objections.
No objections - only thanks and cheers :)
Hanno
___
Zope-Dev maillist - Zope-Dev@zope.org
On Wed, Jul 20, 2011 at 5:24 PM, Malthe Borch mbo...@gmail.com wrote:
I'd like to propose merging this into trunk.
+1
Hanno
___
Zope-Dev maillist - Zope-Dev@zope.org
https://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-dev
** No cross posts or HTML
On Wed, Jul 20, 2011 at 3:36 PM, Chris McDonough chr...@plope.com wrote:
I'm pondering making a release of zope.i18nmessageid to PyPI. It has C
extensions. If I upload the release, does the wineggbuilder still come
along and push windows binary eggs up eventually?
Yes. Just do the release,
On Fri, Jul 15, 2011 at 1:50 PM, Martijn Faassen faas...@startifact.com wrote:
I'd just call the category web framework; 2 out of 3 already say they
are. Zope can then itself say in its description that it's an
application server if that's an important term.
At least zope2.zope.org uses the
On Thu, Jul 14, 2011 at 7:03 PM, Tres Seaver tsea...@palladion.com wrote:
A further micro-optimization is to pre-allocate a big list in a thread
local. Running the attached script produces::
$ python perftest.py
Via insert_0: 24.8401839733
Via append: 15.6596238613
speedup: 37.0%
On Tue, Jul 12, 2011 at 3:07 PM, Michael Howitz m...@gocept.com wrote:
To get the .mo files compiled at runtime you need the following variables in
os.environ:
os.environ['zope_i18n_compile_mo_files'] = 'True'
os.environ['zope_i18n_allowed_languages'] = 'de,en'
(You might replace 'de,en'
On Thu, Jul 7, 2011 at 3:39 PM, Sylvain Viollon sylv...@infrae.com wrote:
On Thu, 07 Jul 2011 13:58:27 +0200
Andreas Jung li...@zopyx.com wrote:
on behalf of the Zope Foundation I please to announce
the relaunch of the new www.zope.org web site.
http://www.zope.org
Great !
+10 :)
Hanno
Hi.
On Tue, Jul 5, 2011 at 9:21 PM, Leonardo Rochael Almeida
leoroch...@gmail.com wrote:
I guess this is the biggest point of contention. Why does the ZMI have
to go? Although both Plone and ERP5 strive to gradually replace ZMI
based configuration with native interfaces (native to Plone/ERP5),
On Tue, Jul 5, 2011 at 10:19 AM, Tobias Helfrich helfr...@know-it.net wrote:
OK, so you do think that we might use Zope 2.12 for a quite long time
without thinking about anymore updates? Will there be any security
updates for Zope 2.12 in the future?
You want to use Zope 2.13. 2.12 is at the
On Mon, Jul 4, 2011 at 10:49 AM, Sylvain Viollon sylv...@infrae.com wrote:
... and I still do use the VirtualHostMonster
(you can trash all the other things).
I agree that its code might not been the best in the world, but it
works for the moment and does what it says (I would love to see
On Mon, Jul 4, 2011 at 12:19 PM, yuppie y.2...@wcm-solutions.de wrote:
Long-term maintenance for Zope 2.13 would give these
projects/deployments at least a few more years.
Yes. I'm willing to cut releases for it for quite a while. I just
expect to see active maintenance from the Plone community
On Tue, Jul 5, 2011 at 11:56 AM, Martin Aspeli optilude+li...@gmail.com wrote:
On 5 July 2011 10:31, Hanno Schlichting ha...@hannosch.eu wrote:
So we just got ourselves a Zope2 version 3.0. And no, naming it 4.0 or
5.0 or anything else doesn't make it any better at all. So 3.0 is the
most
On Tue, Jul 5, 2011 at 12:10 PM, Jens Vagelpohl j...@dataflake.org wrote:
On 7/5/11 11:56 , Martin Aspeli wrote:
On 5 July 2011 10:31, Hanno Schlichtingha...@hannosch.eu wrote:
I'd actually favour calling it Zope2 4.0 just to avoid any mix-up with the
defunct Zope 3, although I don't think
On Tue, Jul 5, 2011 at 2:44 PM, Jens Vagelpohl j...@dataflake.org wrote:
zopefour as a domain isn't very helpful. It would add yet another
top-level name to the existing list (Zope 2, Zope 3).
That was an April fools joke I was referring to. I didn't mean to
suggest to actually use that in any
On Sun, Jul 3, 2011 at 7:09 AM, Chris McDonough chr...@plope.com wrote:
Zope still needs to the virtual host monster (or something like it) even
with the WSGI publisher; there's nothing equivalent in the WSGI world
(unless you could repoze.vhm, which is essentially just the virtual host
On Sun, Jul 3, 2011 at 1:03 AM, Leonardo Rochael Almeida
leoroch...@gmail.com wrote:
I noticed you've been very busy doing clean-up on the Zope2 code base
in the last few hours. As someone who has recently spent a lot of time
porting forward a large and mission-critical code base, ERP5, from
On Wed, Jun 29, 2011 at 10:56 AM, Jens Vagelpohl j...@dataflake.org wrote:
On 6/29/11 10:34 , Hanno Schlichting wrote:
That's a bit confusing. Either we remove the downloads from launchpad
or we make sure it has all of the old ones.
+1 for removing.
I removed all of them from launchpad
On Wed, Jun 29, 2011 at 8:51 AM, Wichert Akkerman wich...@wiggy.net wrote:
My question would be: why launchpad? Is anyone expecting launchpad to be
a canonical resource for Zope releases? As far as I know none of our
documentation refers to launchpad for downloads and launchpad has never
been
Hi Gary, or any other zc.async developer,
we use zc.async in one site and I noticed there's a hell of a lot of
write transactions caused by it.
Every 30 seconds there's a zope.minmax.Maximum() by the name of
last_ping stored. It looks like this is coming from
zc.async.queue.DispatcherAgents and
On Tue, Jun 21, 2011 at 2:39 PM, Tres Seaver tsea...@palladion.com wrote:
Hmmm, many fewer reports than a normal weekday. :(
I disabled the z3c and zc.buildout runs on the winbot, which had been
failing for months now.
Getting daily test failures hasn't convinced anyone to do anything
about
On Fri, Jun 17, 2011 at 2:06 PM, Jim Fulton j...@zope.com wrote:
On Fri, Jun 17, 2011 at 4:53 AM, Robert Niederreiter r...@squarewave.at
wrote:
Any doubts, suggestions, other ideas?
-1 for a new configuration option.
I would rather just have write permission *only* removed
from committed
On Wed, Jun 15, 2011 at 6:50 PM, Subish K S kssubish...@yahoo.com wrote:
We have 10+ Zope (version 2.7) servers ( on different machines). Right now
each Zope server independently handles session management which means that if
a Zope server fails the users on that Zope server do not get
On Wed, Jun 15, 2011 at 7:26 PM, Baiju M baiju.m.m...@gmail.com wrote:
Is memcached a reliable storage for session data ?
I would like to hear others experience with memcached
as a reliable storage for session data.
It depends on what kind of reliability you need. Generally your
sessions
On Sun, Jun 5, 2011 at 8:24 PM, Hanno Schlichting ha...@hannosch.eu wrote:
$ bin/alltests -s Acquisition -t test_mixed_explicit_and_explicit
Running zope.testrunner.layer.UnitTests tests:
Set up zope.testrunner.layer.UnitTests in 0.000 seconds.
Segmentation fault
I haven't yet tried
On Wed, Jun 8, 2011 at 1:08 PM, Jan-Wijbrand Kolman
janwijbr...@gmail.com wrote:
It seems the python-2.7 from the deadsnakes PPA that is installed on
this buildmachine behaves badly. I do not know why, and I do not really
feel like investigating it. I'll remove the python-2.7 PPA install from
regards,
Hanno Schlichting
___
Zope-Dev maillist - Zope-Dev@zope.org
https://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-dev
** No cross posts or HTML encoding! **
(Related lists -
https://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-announce
https://mail.zope.org
On Sun, Jun 5, 2011 at 6:31 PM, Tres Seaver tsea...@palladion.com wrote:
[1] FAILED Zope Buildbot / zope2.13-py2.7 slave-ubuntu64
https://mail.zope.org/pipermail/zope-tests/2011-June/042535.html
[2] FAILED Zope Buildbot / zope2.14-py2.7 slave-ubuntu64
On Sun, Jun 5, 2011 at 8:24 PM, Hanno Schlichting ha...@hannosch.eu wrote:
Or to get the issue quicker:
$ bin/alltests -s Acquisition -t test_mixed_explicit_and_explicit
Running zope.testrunner.layer.UnitTests tests:
Set up zope.testrunner.layer.UnitTests in 0.000 seconds.
Segmentation
On Sun, Jun 5, 2011 at 8:57 PM, Hanno Schlichting ha...@hannosch.eu wrote:
On Sun, Jun 5, 2011 at 8:24 PM, Hanno Schlichting ha...@hannosch.eu wrote:
$ bin/alltests -s Acquisition -t test_mixed_explicit_and_explicit
Running zope.testrunner.layer.UnitTests tests:
Set up
On Mon, May 9, 2011 at 4:29 PM, Hanno Schlichting ha...@hannosch.eu wrote:
On Mon, May 9, 2011 at 4:10 PM, Tres Seaver tsea...@palladion.com wrote:
On 05/09/2011 05:28 AM, Hanno Schlichting wrote:
I tried installing Python 2.6.7rc1 and got tons of test failures in
Zope/Plone. I didn't have
1 - 100 of 620 matches
Mail list logo
