Re: [Zope-dev] Zope 4.0 roadmap release plan

2013-09-16 Thread Hanno Schlichting
On Sat, Sep 14, 2013, at 0:38, Baiju M wrote: Is there any roadmap release plan for Zope 4.0 ? I'm not aware on anyone still working on Zope 4. The project might come back to life at some point, but for the past couple of months it's been very quiet. At my work, we use Zope 2.12 and we are

[Zope-dev] Zope Toolkit - 1.0.8 and 1.1.6 released

2013-05-01 Thread Hanno Schlichting
Hi. On behalf of the Zope Toolkit release team and the Zope community, I'm happy to announce the release of the Zope Toolkit 1.0.8 and 1.1.6. Both releases are minor bugfix releases. To use the new releases, you can use: [buildout] extends =

[Zope-dev] Zope Toolkit - 2.0a1 released

2013-05-01 Thread Hanno Schlichting
Hi. I made a first alpha release of the current ZTK master, which technically just means there's a stable version file at: http://download.zope.org/zopetoolkit/index/2.0a1/ztk-versions.cfg and an overview page at: http://docs.zope.org/zopetoolkit/releases/overview-2.0a1.html I hope this will

Re: [Zope-dev] GitHub and Travis CI

2013-03-04 Thread Hanno Schlichting
On Mon, Mar 4, 2013 at 8:00 PM, Stephan Richter stephan.rich...@gmail.com wrote: So my question is: What do we want to do? I would suggest E-mails on status change should be sufficient. Cool, but please change the default email notification, it's set to spam everyone all the time. See

Re: [Zope-dev] zope-tests - FAILED: 22, OK: 12, UNKNOWN: 2

2013-02-28 Thread Hanno Schlichting
On Thu, Feb 28, 2013 at 8:00 AM, Marius Gedminas mar...@gedmin.as wrote: On Thu, Feb 28, 2013 at 01:00:02AM +, Zope tests summarizer wrote: [3]UNKNOWN : Zope-trunk Python-2.6.8 : Linux [4]UNKNOWN : Zope-trunk Python-2.7.3 : Linux Something new: Zope-trunk Python-2.6.8 :

Re: [Zope-dev] ZTK 2.0: Deprecate zope.sequencesort

2013-02-28 Thread Hanno Schlichting
On Thu, Feb 28, 2013 at 2:43 PM, Stephan Richter stephan.rich...@gmail.com wrote: I would like to deprecate zope.sequencesort in ZTK 2.0, since it cannot properly ported to Python 3, since it depends heavily on the cmp() way of sorting. I am also not a user of the package and I only tried to

Re: [Zope-dev] ZTK 2.0 process

2013-02-27 Thread Hanno Schlichting
On Wed, Feb 27, 2013 at 5:04 PM, Sebastien Douche sdou...@gmail.com wrote: 2. z3c.recipe.compattest and zc.recipe.testrunner doesn't work with Buildout 2. Both do now. You currently need z3c.recipe.compattest from trunk though. I updated the ZTK trunk in the last days, and most of it should

Re: [Zope-dev] ZTK 2.0 process

2013-02-26 Thread Hanno Schlichting
Hi. The process for a ZTK 2.0 release isn't really well defined. I'm not sure if Jan-Wijbrand and Christophe are still interested in working on ZTK releases. Contrary to wait I said before I'd be willing to work on a ZTK 2.0 release (knowing the tools and procedure). My goals for a 2.0 release

Re: [Zope-dev] ZTK 2.0 process

2013-02-26 Thread Hanno Schlichting
On Tue, Feb 26, 2013 at 6:12 PM, Stephan Richter stephan.rich...@gmail.com wrote: Could you outline what the first step would be to create an alpha release list for 2.0? We could manually include an sdist of the ZODB 4 py3 branch to make the tests pass under Python 3. I'll have to look at the

Re: [Zope-dev] Status of the buildout organization on github and a deleted branch

2013-01-11 Thread Hanno Schlichting
The buildout 1.6.x branch was renamed to 1. Jim discussed and announced that on the buildout-development list. Please follow-up on that list for buildout issues. Hanno On Fri, Jan 11, 2013 at 1:51 PM, Patrick Gerken do3cc...@googlemail.comwrote: Hi, I thought I have was part of the

Re: [Zope-dev] Changing id generation in OFS CopyContainer

2013-01-11 Thread Hanno Schlichting
Hi. Sorry, but 2.13 is in bug-fix-only mode. At least as long as I have to do the release management for it. Trunk is fair game, or up to Leonardo really. Hanno On Fri, Jan 11, 2013 at 2:09 PM, Wichert Akkerman wich...@wiggy.net wrote: I want to use INameChooser to select the id of copied

Re: [Zope-dev] Status of github migration

2013-01-10 Thread Hanno Schlichting
On Thu, Jan 10, 2013 at 3:59 PM, Jim Fulton j...@zope.com wrote: On Thu, Jan 10, 2013 at 9:50 AM, Jens Vagelpohl j...@dataflake.org wrote: I did not choose to include or exclude any branch. The test migration uses the package used to migrate most Plone packages from SVN to GitHub, which

Re: [Zope-dev] Small fix in Products.ZCTextIndex, how to go further?

2012-11-14 Thread Hanno Schlichting
Hi. The change looks ok. But I think you broke an optimization. IIRC the code compares the old and new values for the index, and skips the indexing step if they are the same. The typical item.reindexObject() call sents data for all indexes, even if just one or two them have changed. The

Re: [Zope-dev] SVN: Zope/branches/2.12/ LP #1047318: Tighten import restrictions for restricted code.

2012-09-10 Thread Hanno Schlichting
On Mon, Sep 10, 2012 at 10:31 AM, yuppie y.2...@wcm-solutions.de wrote: CMF uses some ZTUtils in restricted code: Batch, LazyFilter, make_query and SimpleTreeMaker. The new Zope 2 releases (2.12.24 and 2.13.17) are not compatible with existing CMF releases. Is this intended? This wasn't

Re: [Zope-dev] zope-tests - FAILED: 24, OK: 17, UNKNOWN: 2

2012-08-29 Thread Hanno Schlichting
On Wed, Aug 29, 2012 at 3:25 PM, Tres Seaver tsea...@palladion.com wrote: That base class has been gone since ZConfig 2.9.2. I don't think the Zope2 trunk has pinned / unpinned ZConfig in a long time, so I'm not sure why it would just now break (ZConfig 2.9.2 was released in February, and

Re: [Zope-dev] AccessControl bug fixed

2012-08-23 Thread Hanno Schlichting
On Thu, Aug 23, 2012 at 5:23 PM, li...@nidelven-it.no wrote: does this have any security implications? In short: No. Long answer: Not unless you have very custom code similar to what's in the provided test (providing a custom rolesForPermissionOn callable on a class). And that code would have

Re: [Zope-dev] AccessControl bug fixed

2012-08-22 Thread Hanno Schlichting
On Wed, Aug 22, 2012 at 3:00 PM, Yusei TAHARA yu...@domen.cx wrote: I found a bug in ZopeSecurityPolicy and fixed it. http://svn.zope.org/AccessControl/trunk/src/AccessControl/ZopeSecurityPolicy.py?rev=127548r1=113657r2=127548 Is it possible to release new version? I can do that. But is

Re: [Zope-dev] We need to change how code ownership works.

2012-08-19 Thread Hanno Schlichting
The Plone Foundation adopted a policy for this, see http://plone.org/foundation/materials/foundation-resolutions/patch-policy-052011 As we don't have any terms of service stating so for any of our issue trackers, we don't get any copyright assignments for reported bugs or proposed patches.

Re: [Zope-dev] [Checkins] SVN: zc.buildout/ Moved to github

2012-08-18 Thread Hanno Schlichting
Please note that development of buildout 2 happens on github since April this year. The buildout developers decided to do the move after Jim suggested it. Legally you could see this move as a fork, but it was done by Jim and others. Alex just wanted to clarify the situation and also move the

Re: [Zope-dev] Zope trunk: browser views

2012-07-10 Thread Hanno Schlichting
On Tue, Jul 10, 2012 at 7:29 AM, yuppie y.2...@wcm-solutions.de wrote: Zope 2 has customized implementations of the ``browser:view`` and ``browser:page`` directives. I tried to make that code more similar to zope.browserpage without breaking Zope 2 and CMF. I guess the biggest change I made

Re: [Zope-dev] zope.intid and zope.keyreference.interfaces.NotYet exception (patch)

2012-07-03 Thread Hanno Schlichting
On Tue, Jul 3, 2012 at 1:56 PM, Jan-Wijbrand Kolman janwijbr...@gmail.com wrote: At the end of this post, I pasted the diff from the current zope.intid trunk against your fork on bitbucket. Maybe this would make it easier for others to comment on it? It would be easier to read if you did the

Re: [Zope-dev] using WSGIPublisher

2012-06-06 Thread Hanno Schlichting
On Wed, Jun 6, 2012 at 5:06 PM, Paul J Stevens p...@nfg.nl wrote: FYI, I'm using the following buildout: https://github.com/pjstevns/plone.mongrel2 You are missing some required middleware for the current un-documented WSGI feature. I made an experiment quite a while back and came up with:

Re: [Zope-dev] using WSGIPublisher

2012-06-06 Thread Hanno Schlichting
On Wed, Jun 6, 2012 at 7:06 PM, Tres Seaver tsea...@palladion.com wrote: On 06/06/2012 12:11 PM, Hanno Schlichting wrote: I've looked into WSGI again at the Plone Symposium East sprint and I think we should remove the middleware approach again for Zope2. Primarily as we loose some features

[Zope-dev] Zope Toolkit - 1.0.7 and 1.1.5 released

2012-05-30 Thread Hanno Schlichting
Hi. On behalf of the Zope Toolkit release team and the Zope community, I'm happy to announce the release of the Zope Toolkit 1.0.7 and 1.1.5. Both releases are minor bugfix releases. To use the new releases, you can use: [buildout] extends =

Re: [Zope-dev] zope-tests - OK: 41

2012-05-28 Thread Hanno Schlichting
On Sun, May 27, 2012 at 3:39 PM, Tres Seaver tsea...@palladion.com wrote: On 05/26/2012 09:00 PM, Zope tests summarizer wrote: Non-OK results -- Yay! Indeed! I updated the ZTK 1.0/1.1 branches to the latest respective bugfix releases. If the buildbots stay green, I'll tag new

[Zope-dev] ZTK 1.0 lifetime

2012-05-22 Thread Hanno Schlichting
On Tue, May 22, 2012 at 4:32 AM, Patrick Gerken do3cc...@googlemail.com wrote: Well, the question is, is there still a need for ztk 1.0 tests? If so, who are the consumers and for how long should we run the tests for 1.0? Zope 2.13 is based on the ZTK 1.0. There's no version of Zope 2 that

Re: [Zope-dev] zope-tests - FAILED: 122, OK: 33, UNKNOWN: 2

2012-05-10 Thread Hanno Schlichting
On Thu, May 10, 2012 at 6:49 PM, Tres Seaver tsea...@palladion.com wrote: Can we please decomission the winbot until somebody has time to fix it? The false negatives could be masking real problems. I tried to reproduce the problem manually on the winbot, but my remote connection died every 10

Re: [Zope-dev] zope-tests - FAILED: 1, OK: 37, UNKNOWN: 2

2012-05-02 Thread Hanno Schlichting
On Wed, May 2, 2012 at 3:40 PM, Adam GROSZER agroszer...@gmail.com wrote: or why that package gets included Adding zc.sourcefactory to the ZTK was a conscious choice. It was popular and often used in Zope 3-style projects, maybe even part of core Grok and BlueBream. We could remove it from ZTK

Re: [Zope-dev] zope-tests - OK: 34, UNKNOWN: 6

2012-04-27 Thread Hanno Schlichting
On Fri, Apr 27, 2012 at 3:18 PM, Adam GROSZER agroszer...@gmail.com wrote: On 04/27/2012 02:58 PM, Patrick Gerken wrote: There still seem to be processes hanging on the windows boxes, unfortunately. restarted the whole box if this happens again then something is wrong with the tests lately

Re: [Zope-dev] zope-tests - FAILED: 6, OK: 33, UNKNOWN: 2

2012-04-20 Thread Hanno Schlichting
On Fri, Apr 20, 2012 at 4:03 AM, Tres Seaver tsea...@palladion.com wrote: On 04/19/2012 09:00 PM, Zope tests summarizer wrote: [2]    UNKNOWN UNKNOWN : winbot / ztk_dev py_265_win64 https://mail.zope.org/pipermail/zope-tests/2012-April/060786.html Ditto.  Maybe that box needs an intervention?

Re: [Zope-dev] Sanity Check on zope.sessions and Zope 2.12.x

2012-04-11 Thread Hanno Schlichting
On Wed, Apr 11, 2012 at 1:13 PM, Jeff Rush jr...@taupro.com wrote: I'm chasing a problem when trying to use zope.sessions with Zope 2.12.x, and I'm beginning to think that they are an incompatible mix of Zope2 and Zope3 technologies. Can anyone confirm either way, so I know whether I'm

Re: [Zope-dev] Adding broken/missing support to zope.interface?

2012-04-09 Thread Hanno Schlichting
On Mon, Apr 9, 2012 at 10:33 PM, Tres Seaver tsea...@palladion.com wrote: Persistent component registries are not a good enough reason to add such coupling (I'd be in favor of splitting support for persistent registries out of zope.component, too, while we're at it). Let's put the broken

Re: [Zope-dev] Bugtracker for z3c.relationfield and reasons for objects loosing their parent pointers

2012-03-27 Thread Hanno Schlichting
On Tue, Mar 27, 2012 at 2:53 PM, Patrick Gerken do3cc...@googlemail.com wrote: I found out, somewhat surprised, that __parent__ pointers are just disguised aq_parent pointers. Are you maybe trying to use or set __parent__ on Acquisition wrappers instead of unwrapped objects? AQ wrappers have

Re: [Zope-dev] Bugtracker for z3c.relationfield and reasons for objects loosing their parent pointers

2012-03-27 Thread Hanno Schlichting
On Tue, Mar 27, 2012 at 3:50 PM, Patrick Gerken do3cc...@googlemail.com wrote: Hmm, since I didn't understand what magic happens with __parent__ pointers, I tried the following in pdb: unwrapped = aq_base(a) unwrapped.__parent__ = aq_base(a.__parent__) So I stored a not acquisition wrapped

Re: [Zope-dev] New release for zope.schema

2012-03-21 Thread Hanno Schlichting
On Wed, Mar 21, 2012 at 6:58 PM, Marius Gedminas mar...@gedmin.as wrote:    For packages that have C extension modules there are probably extra    steps needed to produce Windows binary eggs.  I don't know those    steps (winbot is involved somehow), so I avoid making releases of    packages

Re: [Zope-dev] zope-tests - FAILED: 4, OK: 35

2012-03-15 Thread Hanno Schlichting
On Thu, Mar 15, 2012 at 1:22 PM, Tres Seaver tsea...@palladion.com wrote: On 03/14/2012 09:00 PM, Zope tests summarizer wrote: [1]    FAILED  winbot / ztk_dev py_265_win32 https://mail.zope.org/pipermail/zope-tests/2012-March/059300.html [2]    FAILED  winbot / ztk_dev py_265_win64

Re: [Zope-dev] zope-tests - FAILED: 4, OK: 35

2012-03-15 Thread Hanno Schlichting
On Thu, Mar 15, 2012 at 5:39 PM, Marius Gedminas mar...@gedmin.as wrote: On Thu, Mar 15, 2012 at 03:40:25PM +0100, Hanno Schlichting wrote: z.a.publication added a new requirement for ZODB3=3.10. But ZODB on its 3.10 branch notes its version as 3.10dev. Eh?  That implies that 3.10

Re: [Zope-dev] Bad ZODB 3.10.5 egg on PyPI, cleanup needed

2012-03-12 Thread Hanno Schlichting
On Mon, Mar 12, 2012 at 10:55 PM, Marius Gedminas mar...@gedmin.as wrote: http://pypi.python.org/pypi/ZODB3/3.10.5 contains various proper win32 eggs in addition to that .win32.zip.  The PyPI page for 3.10.4 did not have any weird .win32.zip files. Can someone please remove that dumb binary

Re: [Zope-dev] zc.async versus Zope 2 SIGTERM

2012-03-01 Thread Hanno Schlichting
On Thu, Mar 1, 2012 at 1:42 PM, Vincent Fretin vincent.fre...@gmail.com wrote: Did you look how http://pypi.python.org/pypi/plone.app.async have done the integration with Zope2? IIRC we (Jarn) ran into the same problem when running p.a.async. Our solution was to switch to using SIGINT for

Re: [Zope-dev] Zope Toolkit - 1.0.6 and 1.1.4 released

2012-02-14 Thread Hanno Schlichting
On Tue, Feb 14, 2012 at 2:23 PM, Sebastien Douche sdou...@gmail.com wrote: Cool! Any news for for the trunk? Any chance to see a ZTK 2.0? I'm not involved in ZTK discussions beyond 1.1 or Zope 2 discussions beyond 2.13. But even as a bystander I haven't seen anyone talk about such a release or

[Zope-dev] Zope Toolkit - 1.0.6 and 1.1.4 released

2012-02-13 Thread Hanno Schlichting
Hi. On behalf of the Zope Toolkit release team and the Zope community, I'm happy to announce the release of the Zope Toolkit 1.0.6 and 1.1.4. Both releases are minor bugfix releases. To use the new releases, you can use: [buildout] extends =

Re: [Zope-dev] Zope Toolkit - 1.0.6 and 1.1.4 released

2012-02-13 Thread Hanno Schlichting
On Mon, Feb 13, 2012 at 2:12 PM, Joshua Immanuel j...@hipro.co.in wrote: Wonderful!!. It would be very helpful if there is a changelog associated with it. So, that we can know the important changes that have taken place in associated packages. Sure, that would be helpful. Unfortunately nobody

Re: [Zope-dev] zope-tests - FAILED: 26, OK: 39, UNKNOWN: 2

2012-02-08 Thread Hanno Schlichting
On Wed, Feb 8, 2012 at 10:07 AM, Gediminas Paulauskas mene...@pov.lt wrote: The majority of failures are in zope.testrunner, due to recent update of versions. The offending one is testtools 0.9.13. With testtools 0.9.12 the tests pass. Thanks for looking at those. I hopefully fixed the Zope 4

Re: [Zope-dev] Zope 4 release management

2012-02-06 Thread Hanno Schlichting
On Mon, Feb 6, 2012 at 4:41 PM, Martijn Faassen faas...@startifact.com wrote: I would actually argue that Zope4 have no real release cycle at all: instead, the individual pieces which make up Zope should have their own cycles, with perhaps a ZTK-like tracking set that Plone and others use as

[Zope-dev] ZTK maintenance releases coming up

2012-02-06 Thread Hanno Schlichting
Hi. I just updated the ZTK 1.0 and 1.1 branches to all latest bugfix versions. I'll give the buildbots until Wednesday to build and find any real problems. If there's no problems, I'll cut new ZTK 1.0.x and 1.1.x releases later this week. If you have any other bugfixes you want to get into

[Zope-dev] [zope2] 2.12.x formal end-of-life

2012-02-06 Thread Hanno Schlichting
Hi. I just updated the 2.12.x branch with one last batch of bugfix versions. I'll let the buildbots run and if there's no troubles release one more version later this week. I consider this to be the last maintenance release for the 2.12.x series. From now on 2.12.x will only see security

Re: [Zope-dev] Undo product stops working with recent Zope (StorageTransactionError)

2012-01-24 Thread Hanno Schlichting
On Tue, Jan 24, 2012 at 2:14 PM, li...@nidelven-it.no wrote: It used to work, but with the most recent versions of Zope this error appears if the Undo by date is used more than once: The undo API has changed with ZODB 3.10. As noted in the changelog: The API for undoing multiple transactions

Re: [Zope-dev] zope-tests - FAILED: 3, OK: 60

2011-12-08 Thread Hanno Schlichting
On Thu, Dec 8, 2011 at 8:34 AM, Michael Howitz m...@gocept.com wrote: [3]    FAILED  winbot / ZODB_dev py_254_win32       https://mail.zope.org/pipermail/zope-tests/2011-December/053803.html Same errors like yesterday due to incompatibles with Python 2.4 reps. 2.5. I think I managed to remove

[Zope-dev] Zope Toolkit - 1.0.5 and 1.1.3 released

2011-11-20 Thread Hanno Schlichting
Hi. On behalf of the Zope Toolkit release team and the Zope community, I'm happy to announce the release of the Zope Toolkit 1.0.5 and 1.1.3. Both releases are minor bugfix releases. A schedule for a ZTK 1.2 release is unknown at this point. To use the new release, you can use: [buildout]

Re: [Zope-dev] New ZTK-Release?

2011-11-07 Thread Hanno Schlichting
On Mon, Nov 7, 2011 at 9:01 AM, Michael Howitz m...@gocept.com wrote: after having the buildbots green again, I think it would be a good point in time for a series new ZTK releases: * 1.0.5 (yes, there are even on the 1.0 branch version updates), * 1.1.3, * 1.2c1 (a new release branch from

[Zope-dev] Zope 4 - San Francisco sprint and beyond

2011-11-06 Thread Hanno Schlichting
Hi. A couple of us came together before the Plone conference to work on various Zope related topics. We worked on the following areas: - storing parent pointers (elro, davisagli): we have a branch of Zope that changes OFS to store parent pointers and fixed the issues that arose in copy/cut/paste

Re: [Zope-dev] Zope 4?

2011-10-27 Thread Hanno Schlichting
On Thu, Oct 27, 2011 at 6:26 PM, David Glick davidgl...@groundwire.org wrote: On 10/27/11 9:05 AM, Jim Fulton wrote: Is there a more formal announcement anywhere?  Is there a description of what it is envisioned to be? That came out of this thread on zope-dev back in July:

Re: [Zope-dev] zope-tests - FAILED: 12, OK: 39

2011-10-27 Thread Hanno Schlichting
On Thu, Oct 27, 2011 at 6:44 PM, Tres Seaver tsea...@palladion.com wrote: [12]   FAILED  winbot / z3c.form_py_265_32 https://mail.zope.org/pipermail/zope-tests/2011-October/051752.html Same failure as yesterday:  perhaps it ran before Hanno's pinning fix. Yep. There's two green builds for

Re: [Zope-dev] zope-tests - FAILED: 7, OK: 41

2011-10-26 Thread Hanno Schlichting
On Wed, Oct 26, 2011 at 3:57 AM, Tres Seaver tsea...@palladion.com wrote: [6]    FAILED  winbot / z3c.form_py_265_32 https://mail.zope.org/pipermail/zope-tests/2011-October/051704.html I'm ignoring this one, except to note that it is *not* lxml related. This was a version conflict for some

Re: [Zope-dev] zope-tests - FAILED: 21, OK: 31

2011-10-24 Thread Hanno Schlichting
On Mon, Oct 24, 2011 at 5:08 PM, Tres Seaver tsea...@palladion.com wrote: I also prefer that we drop 2.5 compatibility on the ZTK trunk.  The 2.5.6 release page says[1]:  This release is most likely the final release of Python 2.5; under  the current release policy, no security issues in

Re: [Zope-dev] zope-tests - FAILED: 21, OK: 37

2011-10-23 Thread Hanno Schlichting
On Sat, Oct 22, 2011 at 9:41 PM, Tres Seaver tsea...@palladion.com wrote: #10 - 20 omitted:  perma-failing z3c.* tests esse delendam! I disabled the z3c.* tests on the winbot now. If someone has time to reconfigure it, so those are only run but don't sent out mail notifications - please go

Re: [Zope-dev] [collective.recipe.solrinstance] Example not working

2011-10-18 Thread Hanno Schlichting
On Mon, Oct 17, 2011 at 8:05 PM, Laurence Rowe l...@lrowe.co.uk wrote: Should we migrate the recipe to github and get a free issue tracker? Ok. I've started the SVN to Git migration. Repo will be at https://github.com/hannosch/collective.recipe.solrinstance and anyone who has recently committed

Re: [Zope-dev] [collective.recipe.solrinstance] Example not working

2011-10-17 Thread Hanno Schlichting
On Mon, Oct 17, 2011 at 11:19 AM, Andreas Jung li...@zopyx.com wrote: I used the single-core example for the solrinstance recipe: I think someone reported the Solr core examples to be broken in the latest releases. I don't use the core-variants myself, though. Without an issue tracker, it's

Re: [Zope-dev] Question about RestrictedPython installation with python2.6

2011-10-10 Thread Hanno Schlichting
On Mon, Oct 10, 2011 at 11:12 AM, Ruslan Mahmatkhanov cvs-...@yandex.ru wrote: And this is breaks packaging on FreeBSD, since there will be no before_and_after27.py[c,o] and security_in_syntax27.py[c,o] that we expecting. I know that this files included conditionally, but easy_install still

[Zope-dev] Security vulnerabiity CVE 2011-3587: Arbitrary Code Execution

2011-10-04 Thread Hanno Schlichting
://plone.org/products/plone/security/advisories/20110928. On behalf of the Zope security response team, Hanno Schlichting ___ Zope-Dev maillist - Zope-Dev@zope.org https://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-dev ** No cross posts or HTML encoding

Re: [Zope-dev] Who has access to wineggbuilder was Re: zope.interface 3.8 win eggs

2011-09-24 Thread Hanno Schlichting
On Sat, Sep 24, 2011 at 4:25 PM, Adam Groszer agros...@gmail.com wrote: Something is totally borked there. http://winbot.zope.org/builders/wineggbuilder/builds/13939/steps/release%20eggs/logs/stdio I took a look and fixed the problem. It came down to a missing version pin for BeautifulSoup and

Re: [Zope-dev] access to create z.i and z.c releases

2011-09-22 Thread Hanno Schlichting
On Thu, Sep 22, 2011 at 9:03 AM, Chris McDonough chr...@plope.com wrote: I've made tags for zope.interface 3.8.0 and zope.component 3.11.0, as described in a recent thread to this list, but I don't have PyPI owner rights to publish them.  Can someone add me to the owners list for those

Re: [Zope-dev] cache_detail crash

2011-09-22 Thread Hanno Schlichting
On Thu, Sep 22, 2011 at 10:21 AM, Ruslan Mahmatkhanov cvs-...@yandex.ru wrote: Can anybody reproduce this? Yes, it's a known bug reported at https://bugs.launchpad.net/zope2/+bug/838978 Patches are very welcome for this. Hanno ___ Zope-Dev maillist

Re: [Zope-dev] Passing variable across pages

2011-09-21 Thread Hanno Schlichting
On Wed, Sep 21, 2011 at 12:45 PM, Babylakshmi Muthusamy babylakshmim...@gmail.com wrote: Please suggest me a solution for this. Please post your question to the users mailing list at https://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope This mailing list is for the development of Zope, not development

Re: [Zope-dev] ohloh listings

2011-09-12 Thread Hanno Schlichting
Hi. On Sat, Sep 10, 2011 at 11:32 PM, Chris McDonough chr...@plope.com wrote: Could you delete and readd the failed repository enlistments at https://www.ohloh.net/p/zope/enlistments?page=13 Tried that - had no effect as it indeed recognized the old urls. So I removed them and added them

Re: [Zope-dev] zope.deprecation

2011-09-05 Thread Hanno Schlichting
On Mon, Sep 5, 2011 at 1:09 AM, Chris McDonough chr...@plope.com wrote: I've given Python 3 support to zope.deprecation at http://svn.zope.org/zope.deprecation/branches/chrism-unittesting/ - Which Python versions is this thing meant to support?  I have it  functioning under 2.5, 2.6, 2.7 (and

Re: [Zope-dev] RFC: proposal to split zope.configuration into ZCML and non-ZCML related packages

2011-08-31 Thread Hanno Schlichting
On Wed, Aug 31, 2011 at 9:17 AM, Wolfgang Schnerring w...@gocept.com wrote: Splitting zope.configuration into core mechanics and ZCML support makes a lot of sense to me. So, +1 from me. +1 here too Hanno ___ Zope-Dev maillist - Zope-Dev@zope.org

Re: [Zope-dev] zope-tests - FAILED: 10, OK: 28, UNKNOWN: 3

2011-08-20 Thread Hanno Schlichting
On Fri, Aug 19, 2011 at 7:14 PM, Tres Seaver tsea...@palladion.com wrote: [1]    UNKNOWN FAILED (errors=1) : Zope-2.13-alltests Python-2.6.6 : Linux https://mail.zope.org/pipermail/zope-tests/2011-August/048315.html I think this failure is due to recent acquisition grubbing:: Error in test

Re: [Zope-dev] RFC: Proposal for merging jbohman-zope.registry branch of zope.component

2011-08-17 Thread Hanno Schlichting
On Wed, Aug 17, 2011 at 8:12 AM, Adam GROSZER agros...@gmail.com wrote: On Tue, 16 Aug 2011 22:50:42 -0400 you wrote: - - Merge the 'jbohman-zope.registry' branch of zope.component to the    trunk, and bump its minor version accordingly. Great work, +1 on merging (I trust the GSoC mentor did

Re: [Zope-dev] Segfault in Acquisition in Zope 2

2011-08-15 Thread Hanno Schlichting
On Mon, Aug 15, 2011 at 12:27 PM, Sylvain Viollon sylv...@infrae.com wrote:   I have this problem with:   - Python 2.6 and Zope 2.12   - Python 2.7 and Zope 2.13   (All the latest ones).   This have been observed on 64 bits computers (Mac OS X, FreeBSD and Linux). I don't know about 32

Re: [Zope-dev] zope.interface versions, ZTK 1.0 and later

2011-08-13 Thread Hanno Schlichting
On Sat, Aug 13, 2011 at 3:55 AM, Stephan Richter srich...@cipherhealth.com wrote: On Friday, August 12, 2011, Tres Seaver wrote: Thoughts? +1. Sounds like a good plan. +2 :) Hanno ___ Zope-Dev maillist - Zope-Dev@zope.org

Re: [Zope-dev] Pluggable template engine

2011-08-13 Thread Hanno Schlichting
On Sat, Aug 13, 2011 at 11:33 AM, Malthe Borch mbo...@gmail.com wrote: I will merge this branch if there are no objections. No objections - only thanks and cheers :) Hanno ___ Zope-Dev maillist - Zope-Dev@zope.org

Re: [Zope-dev] Pluggable template engine

2011-07-21 Thread Hanno Schlichting
On Wed, Jul 20, 2011 at 5:24 PM, Malthe Borch mbo...@gmail.com wrote: I'd like to propose merging this into trunk. +1 Hanno ___ Zope-Dev maillist - Zope-Dev@zope.org https://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-dev ** No cross posts or HTML

Re: [Zope-dev] wineggbuilder?

2011-07-20 Thread Hanno Schlichting
On Wed, Jul 20, 2011 at 3:36 PM, Chris McDonough chr...@plope.com wrote: I'm pondering making a release of zope.i18nmessageid to PyPI.  It has C extensions.  If I upload the release, does the wineggbuilder still come along and push windows binary eggs up eventually? Yes. Just do the release,

Re: [Zope-dev] congrats on the new zope.org launch, but..

2011-07-15 Thread Hanno Schlichting
On Fri, Jul 15, 2011 at 1:50 PM, Martijn Faassen faas...@startifact.com wrote: I'd just call the category web framework; 2 out of 3 already say they are. Zope can then itself say in its description that it's an application server if that's an important term. At least zope2.zope.org uses the

Re: [Zope-dev] SVN: Zope/trunk/ Optimized the `OFS.Traversable.getPhysicalPath` method to avoid excessive amounts of method calls. Thx to Nikolay Kim from Enfold

2011-07-14 Thread Hanno Schlichting
On Thu, Jul 14, 2011 at 7:03 PM, Tres Seaver tsea...@palladion.com wrote: A further micro-optimization is to pre-allocate a big list in a thread local.  Running the attached script produces::  $ python perftest.py  Via insert_0: 24.8401839733  Via append: 15.6596238613   speedup: 37.0%  

Re: [Zope-dev] z3c.form missing *.mo files?

2011-07-12 Thread Hanno Schlichting
On Tue, Jul 12, 2011 at 3:07 PM, Michael Howitz m...@gocept.com wrote: To get the .mo files compiled at runtime you need the following variables in os.environ: os.environ['zope_i18n_compile_mo_files'] = 'True' os.environ['zope_i18n_allowed_languages'] = 'de,en' (You might replace 'de,en'

Re: [Zope-dev] www.zope.org relaunched

2011-07-07 Thread Hanno Schlichting
On Thu, Jul 7, 2011 at 3:39 PM, Sylvain Viollon sylv...@infrae.com wrote: On Thu, 07 Jul 2011 13:58:27 +0200 Andreas Jung li...@zopyx.com wrote: on behalf of the Zope Foundation I please to announce the relaunch of the new www.zope.org web site. http://www.zope.org  Great ! +10 :) Hanno

Re: [Zope-dev] direction

2011-07-06 Thread Hanno Schlichting
Hi. On Tue, Jul 5, 2011 at 9:21 PM, Leonardo Rochael Almeida leoroch...@gmail.com wrote: I guess this is the biggest point of contention. Why does the ZMI have to go? Although both Plone and ERP5 strive to gradually replace ZMI based configuration with native interfaces (native to Plone/ERP5),

Re: [Zope-dev] direction

2011-07-05 Thread Hanno Schlichting
On Tue, Jul 5, 2011 at 10:19 AM, Tobias Helfrich helfr...@know-it.net wrote: OK, so you do think that we might use Zope 2.12 for a quite long time without thinking about anymore updates? Will there be any security updates for Zope 2.12 in the future? You want to use Zope 2.13. 2.12 is at the

Re: [Zope-dev] direction

2011-07-05 Thread Hanno Schlichting
On Mon, Jul 4, 2011 at 10:49 AM, Sylvain Viollon sylv...@infrae.com wrote:  ... and I still do use the VirtualHostMonster  (you can trash all the other things).  I agree that its code might not been the best in the world, but it  works for the moment and does what it says (I would love to see

Re: [Zope-dev] direction

2011-07-05 Thread Hanno Schlichting
On Tue, Jul 5, 2011 at 11:03 AM, Martin Aspeli optilude+li...@gmail.com wrote: I would've thought it would also be possible for those who rely on this to maintain the relevant eggs as optional installations against Zope 2.x, no? The ZMI is not a package - we don't have a split into zope and

Re: [Zope-dev] direction

2011-07-05 Thread Hanno Schlichting
On Mon, Jul 4, 2011 at 12:19 PM, yuppie y.2...@wcm-solutions.de wrote: Long-term maintenance for Zope 2.13 would give these projects/deployments at least a few more years. Yes. I'm willing to cut releases for it for quite a while. I just expect to see active maintenance from the Plone community

Re: [Zope-dev] direction

2011-07-05 Thread Hanno Schlichting
On Tue, Jul 5, 2011 at 11:56 AM, Martin Aspeli optilude+li...@gmail.com wrote: On 5 July 2011 10:31, Hanno Schlichting ha...@hannosch.eu wrote: So we just got ourselves a Zope2 version 3.0. And no, naming it 4.0 or 5.0 or anything else doesn't make it any better at all. So 3.0 is the most

Re: [Zope-dev] direction

2011-07-05 Thread Hanno Schlichting
On Tue, Jul 5, 2011 at 12:10 PM, Jens Vagelpohl j...@dataflake.org wrote: On 7/5/11 11:56 , Martin Aspeli wrote: On 5 July 2011 10:31, Hanno Schlichtingha...@hannosch.eu  wrote: I'd actually favour calling it Zope2 4.0 just to avoid any mix-up with the defunct Zope 3, although I don't think

Re: [Zope-dev] direction

2011-07-05 Thread Hanno Schlichting
On Tue, Jul 5, 2011 at 2:44 PM, Jens Vagelpohl j...@dataflake.org wrote: zopefour as a domain isn't very helpful. It would add yet another top-level name to the existing list (Zope 2, Zope 3). That was an April fools joke I was referring to. I didn't mean to suggest to actually use that in any

Re: [Zope-dev] direction

2011-07-03 Thread Hanno Schlichting
On Sun, Jul 3, 2011 at 7:09 AM, Chris McDonough chr...@plope.com wrote: Zope still needs to the virtual host monster (or something like it) even with the WSGI publisher; there's nothing equivalent in the WSGI world (unless you could repoze.vhm, which is essentially just the virtual host

Re: [Zope-dev] direction

2011-07-02 Thread Hanno Schlichting
On Sun, Jul 3, 2011 at 1:03 AM, Leonardo Rochael Almeida leoroch...@gmail.com wrote: I noticed you've been very busy doing clean-up on the Zope2 code base in the last few hours. As someone who has recently spent a lot of time porting forward a large and mission-critical code base, ERP5, from

Re: [Zope-dev] versions on zope.org and launchpad.net

2011-07-01 Thread Hanno Schlichting
On Wed, Jun 29, 2011 at 10:56 AM, Jens Vagelpohl j...@dataflake.org wrote: On 6/29/11 10:34 , Hanno Schlichting wrote: That's a bit confusing. Either we remove the downloads from launchpad or we make sure it has all of the old ones. +1 for removing. I removed all of them from launchpad

Re: [Zope-dev] versions on zope.org and launchpad.net

2011-06-29 Thread Hanno Schlichting
On Wed, Jun 29, 2011 at 8:51 AM, Wichert Akkerman wich...@wiggy.net wrote: My question would be: why launchpad? Is anyone expecting launchpad to be a canonical resource for Zope releases? As far as I know none of our documentation refers to launchpad for downloads and launchpad has never been

[Zope-dev] zc.async.queue.DispatcherAgents last_ping

2011-06-29 Thread Hanno Schlichting
Hi Gary, or any other zc.async developer, we use zc.async in one site and I noticed there's a hell of a lot of write transactions caused by it. Every 30 seconds there's a zope.minmax.Maximum() by the name of last_ping stored. It looks like this is coming from zc.async.queue.DispatcherAgents and

Re: [Zope-dev] zope-tests - OK: 64, UNKNOWN: 1

2011-06-21 Thread Hanno Schlichting
On Tue, Jun 21, 2011 at 2:39 PM, Tres Seaver tsea...@palladion.com wrote: Hmmm, many fewer reports than a normal weekday.  :( I disabled the z3c and zc.buildout runs on the winbot, which had been failing for months now. Getting daily test failures hasn't convinced anyone to do anything about

Re: [Zope-dev] Configurable Blob Permissions ZODB

2011-06-17 Thread Hanno Schlichting
On Fri, Jun 17, 2011 at 2:06 PM, Jim Fulton j...@zope.com wrote: On Fri, Jun 17, 2011 at 4:53 AM, Robert Niederreiter r...@squarewave.at wrote: Any doubts, suggestions, other ideas? -1 for a new configuration option. I would rather just have write permission *only* removed from committed

Re: [Zope-dev] Sharing session between different zope servers

2011-06-15 Thread Hanno Schlichting
On Wed, Jun 15, 2011 at 6:50 PM, Subish K S kssubish...@yahoo.com wrote: We have 10+ Zope  (version 2.7) servers ( on different machines). Right now each Zope server independently handles session management which means that if a Zope server fails the users on that Zope server do not get

Re: [Zope-dev] Sharing session between different zope servers

2011-06-15 Thread Hanno Schlichting
On Wed, Jun 15, 2011 at 7:26 PM, Baiju M baiju.m.m...@gmail.com wrote: Is memcached a reliable storage for session data ? I would like to hear others experience with memcached as a reliable storage for session data. It depends on what kind of reliability you need. Generally your sessions

Re: [Zope-dev] zope-tests - FAILED: 9, OK: 72

2011-06-11 Thread Hanno Schlichting
On Sun, Jun 5, 2011 at 8:24 PM, Hanno Schlichting ha...@hannosch.eu wrote: $ bin/alltests -s Acquisition -t test_mixed_explicit_and_explicit Running zope.testrunner.layer.UnitTests tests:  Set up zope.testrunner.layer.UnitTests in 0.000 seconds. Segmentation fault I haven't yet tried

Re: [Zope-dev] zope-tests - FAILED: 9, OK: 72

2011-06-11 Thread Hanno Schlichting
On Wed, Jun 8, 2011 at 1:08 PM, Jan-Wijbrand Kolman janwijbr...@gmail.com wrote: It seems the python-2.7 from the deadsnakes PPA that is installed on this buildmachine behaves badly. I do not know why, and I do not really feel like investigating it. I'll remove the python-2.7 PPA install from

[Zope-dev] Zope Toolkit - 1.0.3 and 1.1.2 released

2011-06-09 Thread Hanno Schlichting
regards, Hanno Schlichting ___ Zope-Dev maillist - Zope-Dev@zope.org https://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-dev ** No cross posts or HTML encoding! ** (Related lists - https://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-announce https://mail.zope.org

Re: [Zope-dev] zope-tests - FAILED: 9, OK: 72

2011-06-05 Thread Hanno Schlichting
On Sun, Jun 5, 2011 at 6:31 PM, Tres Seaver tsea...@palladion.com wrote: [1]    FAILED  Zope Buildbot / zope2.13-py2.7 slave-ubuntu64        https://mail.zope.org/pipermail/zope-tests/2011-June/042535.html [2]    FAILED  Zope Buildbot / zope2.14-py2.7 slave-ubuntu64        

Re: [Zope-dev] zope-tests - FAILED: 9, OK: 72

2011-06-05 Thread Hanno Schlichting
On Sun, Jun 5, 2011 at 8:24 PM, Hanno Schlichting ha...@hannosch.eu wrote: Or to get the issue quicker: $ bin/alltests -s Acquisition -t test_mixed_explicit_and_explicit Running zope.testrunner.layer.UnitTests tests:  Set up zope.testrunner.layer.UnitTests in 0.000 seconds. Segmentation

  1   2   3   4   5   6   7   >