-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Baiju M wrote:
> Chris McDonough wrote:
>> Is there an equivalent for "tests_require" in
>> buildout.cfg/zc.recipe.testrunner?
>>
>> The reason I ask is this... currently the zope.18n distribution has
>> an install_requires that looks something lik
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Tres Seaver wrote:
> You are correct: I was misled by the presence of the section for the
> 'tests' extra. Attached find a patch against the setuptools-0.6 branch
> which addes a 'tests_require.txt' file entry point. I will propose that
> the patch
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Jim Fulton wrote:
> On Nov 15, 2007, at 9:35 AM, Tres Seaver wrote:
> ...
>> Chris is not advocating switching away from zc.buildout for the
>> *development* of the packages; he is arguing that we can't force
>> people
>> who *use* the packages to s
Previously Fred Drake wrote:
> On Nov 15, 2007 9:35 AM, Tres Seaver <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > - Making sure that the tests can psss for somebody who is not a
> >core Zope developer, (and therefore who doesn't know about
> >zc.buildout, or want to). E.g.:
> >
> > $ /path/to/python
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Jim Fulton wrote:
> On Nov 15, 2007, at 10:52 AM, Tres Seaver wrote:
> ...
>>> Gr. I find "setup.py test" to be really annoying as it requires
>>> meta data that is available only to that command.
>> Not after running 'egg_info', or any other setup
Jim Fulton wrote at 2007-11-15 10:28 -0500:
> ...
>Agreed. I'll note that there is a school of thought that I proposed
>but am somewhat ambivalent about that anything required by tests
>should also be required by install. This is in accordance with "fly
>what you test, test what you fly." To
On Nov 15, 2007, at 12:44 PM, Dieter Maurer wrote:
Jim Fulton wrote at 2007-11-15 10:28 -0500:
...
Agreed. I'll note that there is a school of thought that I proposed
but am somewhat ambivalent about that anything required by tests
should also be required by install. This is in accordance with
On Nov 15, 2007 9:35 AM, Tres Seaver <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> - Making sure that the tests can psss for somebody who is not a
>core Zope developer, (and therefore who doesn't know about
>zc.buildout, or want to). E.g.:
>
> $ /path/to/python setup.py develop
> $ /path/to/python
On Nov 15, 2007, at 10:52 AM, Tres Seaver wrote:
...
Gr. I find "setup.py test" to be really annoying as it requires
meta data that is available only to that command.
Not after running 'egg_info', or any other setuptools-aware command;
the tests_require dependencies then become introspecta
On Nov 15, 2007, at 9:35 AM, Tres Seaver wrote:
...
Chris is not advocating switching away from zc.buildout for the
*development* of the packages; he is arguing that we can't force
people
who *use* the packages to stop using the facilities supplied
setuptools.
Agreed,
If we want people o
10 matches
Mail list logo