Am Donnerstag, den 07.04.2005, 01:45 +0200 schrieb Florent Guillaume:
> After spending an hour helping someone debug a site that had an hidden
> SiteRoot somewhere that prevented a virtual host monster from working,
> it was suggested to me that if there's a virtual host monster, it
> should tak
On Apr 7, 2005, at 9:08, Tino Wildenhain wrote:
Am Donnerstag, den 07.04.2005, 01:45 +0200 schrieb Florent Guillaume:
After spending an hour helping someone debug a site that had an hidden
SiteRoot somewhere that prevented a virtual host monster from working,
it was suggested to me that if there's
Andreas Jung wrote:
Chris wants to backport it to 2.7 x; I'm opposed. Your call.
If it does not change the default behaviour we have in 2.7.5... why not...
Cool, thanks, I'll look at merging for 2.7.6 :-)
cheers,
Chris
--
Simplistix - Content Management, Zope & Python Consulting
- http
Richard Jones wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Thu, 7 Apr 2005 02:49 am, Jim Fulton wrote:
Paul Winkler wrote:
i.e. will I still write:
security.declareProtected(SomePermission, 'foo')
def foo(self):
...
That will work, and I don't see a need to deprecate it.
Eve
I wonder if it is of public interest to include the ExtendedPathIndex from
Plone in Zope 2.8.
It offers some the nice extension to limit the depth of the search and
improves building navigation-trees
or similar structures. Opinions?
Andreas
pgp8nmyWX3hEd.pgp
Description: PGP signature
___
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Andreas Jung wrote:
> I wonder if it is of public interest to include the ExtendedPathIndex
> from Plone in Zope 2.8.
> It offers some the nice extension to limit the depth of the search and
> improves building navigation-trees
> or similar structures
-1 for removing it. I think it's a cool feature :-)
I like the ability to use a 'blank' SiteRoot (one with a blank base and
path) in conjunction with an access rule to set request variables when I
access my site in through a particular point (eg set the plone_skin
variable when I access my site
Andreas Jung <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I wonder if it is of public interest to include the ExtendedPathIndex from
> Plone in Zope 2.8.
> It offers some the nice extension to limit the depth of the search and
> improves building navigation-trees or similar structures. Opinions?
+1 if it's a
Richard Jones wrote:
[snip]
Is this a general trend for Zope 2? I'd rather see Zope 2 kinda avoid ZCML if
possible.
The Five integration philosophy at least, is that it makes use of ZCML
*possible* in Zope 2, but not at all mandatory. Five tries to mess with
the innards of Zope 2 as much as possi
Andreas Jung wrote:
I wonder if it is of public interest to include the ExtendedPathIndex
from Plone in Zope 2.8. It offers some the nice extension to limit
the depth of the search and improves building navigation-trees or
similar structures. Opinions?
While the feature sounds cool, I tend to be
--On Donnerstag, 7. April 2005 8:00 Uhr -0400 Tres Seaver
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
I doubt many folks on this list know the code that well. Are you
thinking to lift the features you mention, making them part of the
regular PathIndex? Also, what
--On Donnerstag, 7. April 2005 14:49 Uhr +0200 Martijn Faassen
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Andreas Jung wrote:
I wonder if it is of public interest to include the ExtendedPathIndex
from Plone in Zope 2.8. It offers some the nice extension to limit
the depth of the search and improves building n
Richard Jones wrote:
Is this a general trend for Zope 2? I'd rather see Zope 2 kinda avoid ZCML if
possible. It's just one of those personal preference things, I suppose, but I
know I'm not the only one who isn't that enamored of the ZCML approach. I
actually like having the declarations all in
Chris Withers wrote:
Richard Jones wrote:
Is this a general trend for Zope 2? I'd rather see Zope 2 kinda avoid
ZCML if possible. It's just one of those personal preference things, I
suppose, but I know I'm not the only one who isn't that enamored of
the ZCML approach. I actually like having the
On Thu, Apr 07, 2005 at 12:55:09PM +0100, Laurence Rowe wrote:
> -1 for removing it. I think it's a cool feature :-)
>
> I like the ability to use a 'blank' SiteRoot (one with a blank base and
> path) in conjunction with an access rule to set request variables when I
> access my site in through
Andreas Jung wrote:
--On Donnerstag, 7. April 2005 14:49 Uhr +0200 Martijn Faassen
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Andreas Jung wrote:
I wonder if it is of public interest to include the ExtendedPathIndex
from Plone in Zope 2.8. It offers some the nice extension to limit
the depth of the search and
--On Donnerstag, 7. April 2005 20:15 Uhr +0200 Martijn Faassen
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Andreas Jung wrote:
--On Donnerstag, 7. April 2005 14:49 Uhr +0200 Martijn Faassen
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Andreas Jung wrote:
I wonder if it is of public interest to include the ExtendedPathIndex
from
Paul Winkler wrote:
On Thu, Apr 07, 2005 at 12:55:09PM +0100, Laurence Rowe wrote:
-1 for removing it. I think it's a cool feature :-)
I like the ability to use a 'blank' SiteRoot (one with a blank base and
path) in conjunction with an access rule to set request variables when I
access my site in
Richard Jones wrote:
> Is this a general trend for Zope 2? I'd rather see Zope 2 kinda avoid ZCML if
> possible. It's just one of those personal preference things, I suppose, but I
> know I'm not the only one who isn't that enamored of the ZCML approach.
ZCML started out for me (and as an experinc
19 matches
Mail list logo
