--On 28. März 2006 10:55:29 -0500 Tres Seaver <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
- -1. This is explicitly the kind of change which our branch policy is
supposed to disallow: we have no way of knowing what kind of damage we
will be inflicting on people's applications if we replace the version of
Fi
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Rocky Burt wrote:
> On Tue, 2006-28-03 at 08:58 +0200, Philipp von Weitershausen wrote:
>
>>Chris McDonough wrote:
>>
>>>-1... Five 1.2 has quite a few differences from Five 1.0 that would stop
>>>products written for Five 1.0 from working properly.
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Andreas Jung wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Zope 2.8 ships/shipped with Five 1.0 which is very old and no longer
> actively maintained. Most ppl doing currently development with Zope 2.8
> are using Five 1.2. Should we upgrade the Five version in Zope 2.8 to
> Five
On Tue, 2006-28-03 at 08:58 +0200, Philipp von Weitershausen wrote:
> Chris McDonough wrote:
> > -1... Five 1.2 has quite a few differences from Five 1.0 that would stop
> > products written for Five 1.0 from working properly. I've not gone to
> > 2.9 on a few projects for this reason (sticking wi
Chris McDonough wrote:
> -1... Five 1.2 has quite a few differences from Five 1.0 that would stop
> products written for Five 1.0 from working properly. I've not gone to
> 2.9 on a few projects for this reason (sticking with 2.8). 2.9 is where
> the new version belongs, IMO.
Out of curiosity, wh
Andreas Jung zopyx.com> writes:
...
> Should we upgrade the Five version in Zope 2.8 to Five
> 1.2 to make their lives a bit easier?
+1 on a 2.8.7 with a viable Five.
Alec Mitchell
___
Zope-Dev maillist - Zope-Dev@zope.org
http://ma
Jens Vagelpohl wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 27 Mar 2006, at 11:55, Philipp von Weitershausen wrote:
Andreas Jung wrote:
Zope 2.8 ships/shipped with Five 1.0 which is very old and no longer
actively maintained. Most ppl doing currently development with Zope
2.8 are u
On Mon, 2006-27-03 at 07:35 +0200, Andreas Jung wrote:
> Zope 2.8 ships/shipped with Five 1.0 which is very old and no longer
> actively maintained. Most ppl doing currently development with Zope 2.8
> are using Five 1.2. Should we upgrade the Five version in Zope 2.8 to Five
> 1.2 to make their l
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 27 Mar 2006, at 11:55, Philipp von Weitershausen wrote:
Andreas Jung wrote:
Zope 2.8 ships/shipped with Five 1.0 which is very old and no longer
actively maintained. Most ppl doing currently development with Zope
2.8 are using Five 1.2. Should
Andreas Jung wrote:
> Zope 2.8 ships/shipped with Five 1.0 which is very old and no longer
> actively maintained. Most ppl doing currently development with Zope
> 2.8 are using Five 1.2. Should we upgrade the Five version in Zope
> 2.8 to Five 1.2 to make their lives a bit easier? There is possi
10 matches
Mail list logo
