Jim Fulton wrote:
Jim Fulton wrote:
The first question is:
Is it a problem to have two packages with names differing only in case?
+1
--
- Michael R. Bernstein
michaelbernstein.com
Author of Zope Bible
___
Zope-Dev maillist - [EMAIL PROTECTED]
h
Marius Gedminas wrote:
On Wed, Apr 14, 2004 at 11:06:37AM -0400, Jim Fulton wrote:
What about renaming the Zope 3 zope package to "z".
Examples (from the buddydemo example):
import z.interface
from z.app import zapi
from z.app.event import publish
from z.app.event.objectevent import ObjectMo
On Wednesday 14 April 2004 10:52 am, Jim Fulton wrote:
> packages become very unsttractive. It turns out that pkgutil will be
> confused by the Zope package on Windows or Mac OS, adding it's directory
> to the zope package's path. This is a bug in pkgutil that can be fixed,
> but it is an examp
On Wed, Apr 14, 2004 at 11:06:37AM -0400, Jim Fulton wrote:
> What about renaming the Zope 3 zope package to "z".
>
> Examples (from the buddydemo example):
>
> import z.interface
> from z.app import zapi
> from z.app.event import publish
> from z.app.event.objectevent import ObjectModifi
Jim Fulton wrote:
...
Give the responses. I need to recast my question as a selection
among alternatives. But, before I do that, we will need to consider
alternatives a bit more.
OK, here's another.
What about renaming the Zope 3 zope package to "z".
- It fits with the expansion of "Zope":
"Z
Jim Fulton wrote:
The first question is:
Is it a problem to have two packages with names differing only in case?
+1
A response with a positive sign (e.g. +1, +0, +2, ...) indicates
agreement that this is a probelm. :)
Jim
Andrew
--
Zope Corporation
Software Engineer
(540) 361-1700
___
Jim Fulton wrote:
Jim Fulton wrote:
...
I should have been clearer.
The first question is:
Is it a problem to have two packages with names differing only in case?
I haven't gotten as many responses on this as I expected. I'll try to
summarize
Wrong. People don't find the question useful.
G
-1, it is not really a problem. As Chris pointed out, this will be hard to
explain in documentation, but I think it will not be as big of a pain as
requiring 3rd parties to change their code (this is for both, Zope 2 and 3).
Furthermore, I really dislike the option of renaming "zope" in Zope 3 t
On Wednesday 14 April 2004 09:54 am, Kapil Thangavelu wrote:
> its probably a problem imo for mac users who are on a case insensitive
> fs.
Is this still an issue for Mac OS X, or is your concern for classic Mac OS? I
don't know if we support that (simply because I've never heard anyone mentio
Kapil Thangavelu wrote:
On Wed, 2004-04-14 at 09:00, Jim Fulton wrote:
The first question is:
Is it a problem to have two packages with names differing only in case?
Perhaps we can get more input on whether there's a problem.
A response with a positive sign (e.g. +1, +0, +2, ...) indicates
a
On Wed, 2004-04-14 at 09:00, Jim Fulton wrote:
> The first question is:
>
> Is it a problem to have two packages with names differing only in case?
>
>
> Perhaps we can get more input on whether there's a problem.
>
> A response with a positive sign (e.g. +1, +0, +2, ...) indicates
> agreement
Jim Fulton wrote:
Zope 2 has a package named "Zope". Zope 3 has a package named "zope".
Starting with Zope 2.8, parts of Zope 3 will be included in Zope 2.
As things stand, this will require having both "Zope" and "zope" packages.
Python can handle this fine, however, it will require putting the pa
12 matches
Mail list logo
