--On 2. Februar 2007 22:53:50 +0100 Dieter Maurer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
But anyway, all I can do is register my concern, you're gonna do
whatever you do. ;-)
I am on your side, Chris.
But, I fear, we will not be heard...
One last remark. You all are highly recognized members of
On Feb 3, 2007, at 2:54 AM, Andreas Jung wrote:
With the argumentation that some old code might break with deprecated
APIs you can fight almost against any kind of deprecation.
I think deprecations are good when they serve a good purpose, but IMO
this specific deprecation has no benefit other
--On 2. Februar 2007 22:53:50 +0100 Dieter Maurer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
There's a good deal of code using it that we just don't see because
it's "internal-only". When the API disappears, making people revisit
that code is particularly pointless; it's makework. OTOH, if the API
is not
Chris McDonough wrote at 2007-2-1 13:32 -0500:
>> 0, for keeping zLOG for the time being...
>> -1, for undeprecating it. Using Python's logging module should remain
>> the only recommended solution. I don't want to see any new code using
>> zLOG.
>
>There's a good deal of code using it that we just
Andreas Jung wrote:
0, for keeping zLOG for the time being...
-1, for undeprecating it. Using Python's logging module should remain
the only recommended solution. I don't want to see any new code using
zLOG.
Totally agreed...
Chris
--
Simplistix - Content Management, Zope & Python Consulting
I'm OK with keeping it deprecated forever.
___
Zope-Dev maillist - Zope-Dev@zope.org
http://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-dev
** No cross posts or HTML encoding! **
(Related lists -
http://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-announce
http://m
On Feb 1, 2007, at 1:06 PM, Andreas Jung wrote:
How would a user who got a zLOG import error know they needed to
download
something unless we leave a stub module and the deprecation
warning in
forever? Leaving it in and undeprecating it would allow lots of old
products to work without any c
--On 1. Februar 2007 12:31:12 -0500 Chris McDonough <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
On Feb 1, 2007, at 11:59 AM, Andreas Jung wrote:
--On 1. Februar 2007 11:01:56 -0500 Chris McDonough
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
How many people would get indignant if I checked in a fix that
undeprecated zLO
On Feb 1, 2007, at 11:59 AM, Andreas Jung wrote:
--On 1. Februar 2007 11:01:56 -0500 Chris McDonough
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
How many people would get indignant if I checked in a fix that
undeprecated zLOG? Removing the API seems silly, since its just a
wrapper around the logging modu
--On 1. Februar 2007 11:01:56 -0500 Chris McDonough <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
How many people would get indignant if I checked in a fix that
undeprecated zLOG? Removing the API seems silly, since its just a
wrapper around the logging module now anyway.
-0. We could make zLOG available a
How many people would get indignant if I checked in a fix that
undeprecated zLOG? Removing the API seems silly, since its just a
wrapper around the logging module now anyway.
- C
___
Zope-Dev maillist - Zope-Dev@zope.org
http://mail.zope.org/mai
11 matches
Mail list logo
