On Sun, Mar 09, 2008 at 08:54:11PM -0400, Gary Poster wrote:
> I did a five-minute skim of the checkin but hope to look a bit more
> tomorrow. Hopefully Marius, Benji, Albertas, or someone else who has
> actually done work on this package will take a look and chime in.
I intend to. Actually, I
On Mar 11, 2008, at 5:01 PM, Matthew Grant wrote:
Hi!
On Sun, 2008-03-09 at 20:54 -0400, Gary Poster wrote:
I did have one somewhat trivial thought. I generally prefer
durations
and intervals expressed as datetime.timedeltas myself, because they
convey their meaning without having to look
Hi!
On Sun, 2008-03-09 at 20:54 -0400, Gary Poster wrote:
> I did have one somewhat trivial thought. I generally prefer durations
> and intervals expressed as datetime.timedeltas myself, because they
> convey their meaning without having to look it up docs (is that number
> value a number
On Sun, Mar 9, 2008 at 7:54 PM, Gary Poster <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I did have one somewhat trivial thought. I generally prefer durations
> and intervals expressed as datetime.timedeltas myself, because they
> convey their meaning without having to look it up docs (is that number
> value
I did a five-minute skim of the checkin but hope to look a bit more
tomorrow. Hopefully Marius, Benji, Albertas, or someone else who has
actually done work on this package will take a look and chime in.
I did have one somewhat trivial thought. I generally prefer durations
and intervals ex
These changes sound great.
I just looked for your checkins in the checkins list. I didn't find
them. If I recall correctly, this usually happens if the committer is
not subscribed to the list and has not been blessed by an admin to let
the messages through anyway.
So, if I'm right, it w
--On 9. März 2008 21:11:21 +1300 Matthew Grant <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
Hi!
Just created a new branch for zope.sendmail.
This is a result of the state machine analysis work I did on it after
finding that it was creating problems on sending mail to our smart
host...
svn+ssh://[EMAIL PROT