-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Paul Winkler wrote:
> On Sat, Mar 04, 2006 at 12:38:38AM +0100, Thomas Lotze wrote:
>
>>What was the reason for choosing these and not choosing others?
>
>
> Minimal dependencies.
> We thought we should start with easier packages.
Right. The sele
On Sat, Mar 04, 2006 at 12:38:38AM +0100, Thomas Lotze wrote:
> What was the reason for choosing these and not choosing others?
Minimal dependencies.
We thought we should start with easier packages.
--
Paul Winkler
http://www.slinkp.com
___
Zope3-dev
Am Mon, 27 Feb 2006 15:56:16 -0600 schrieb Paul Winkler:
> We are planning to do this to a number of other packages:
>
> zope.i18n
> zope.i18nmessageid
> zope.deprecation
> zope.exceptions
> zope.tal
> zope.component
What was the reason for choosing these and not choosing others? What
about, e.g
The Buildbot has detected a failed build of Zope3 trunk 2.4 Windows 2000
zc-bbwin3.
Buildbot URL: http://buildbot.zope.org/
Build Reason: changes
Build Source Stamp: 3571
Blamelist: alga
BUILD FAILED: failed test_2
sincerely,
-The Buildbot
___
Zope
The Buildbot has detected a failed build of Zope3 trunk 2.4 Linux tlotze.
Buildbot URL: http://buildbot.zope.org/
Build Reason: changes
Build Source Stamp: 3571
Blamelist: alga
BUILD FAILED: failed test_2
sincerely,
-The Buildbot
___
Zope3-dev maili
The Buildbot has detected a failed build of Zope3 trunk 2.4 Windows 2000
zc-bbwin3.
Buildbot URL: http://buildbot.zope.org/
Build Reason: changes
Build Source Stamp: 3570
Blamelist: alga
BUILD FAILED: failed test_2
sincerely,
-The Buildbot
___
Zope
The Buildbot has detected a failed build of Zope3 trunk 2.4 Linux zc-buildbot.
Buildbot URL: http://buildbot.zope.org/
Build Reason: changes
Build Source Stamp: 3571
Blamelist: alga
BUILD FAILED: failed test_2
sincerely,
-The Buildbot
___
Zope3-dev
The Buildbot has detected a failed build of Zope3 trunk 2.4 Linux tlotze.
Buildbot URL: http://buildbot.zope.org/
Build Reason: changes
Build Source Stamp: 3570
Blamelist: alga
BUILD FAILED: failed test_2
sincerely,
-The Buildbot
___
Zope3-dev maili
The Buildbot has detected a failed build of Zope3 trunk 2.4 Linux zc-buildbot.
Buildbot URL: http://buildbot.zope.org/
Build Reason: changes
Build Source Stamp: 3570
Blamelist: alga
BUILD FAILED: failed test_2
sincerely,
-The Buildbot
___
Zope3-dev
On 3/3/06, Dieter Maurer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> MS renames its core technologies every few years (at least)
Eh... no they don't. It's been called "MS Windows", and "MS Office"
and the like for like 15-20 years now. :-) In fact I can't think of
any case where Microsoft have renamed any tech
Lennart Regebro wrote at 2006-3-2 20:39 +0100:
> ...
>2. Zope3 may also get slightly streamlined, so that Zope3 is what is
>needed to run Zope2 but not more. That means that Zope3 would lose the
>ZMI.
I would consider this a severe loss.
The ZMI provides menu guided operations.
This is much easie
Martijn Faassen wrote at 2006-3-2 18:44 +0100:
> ...
>I worry about losing brands we've worked on hard to establish. While
>many people do not understand the difference between Zope 2 and Zope 3,
> many others have heard about Zope 3 and they know it is not Zope 2.
I do not understand the "loss
Stefane Fermigier wrote:
Zed/The Component Architecture Formerlyknown as Zope/GoldEgg/whatever
that's not called Zope something: YUCK!
(Who's Zed? Zed's dead, baby!)
+ sys.maxint
Chris
--
Simplistix - Content Management, Zope & Python Consulting
- http://www.simplistix.co.uk
___
Martin Aspeli wrote:
Personally, I still find it hard to know where the line goes between the
ZMI and my own UI code, if I should be extending the ZMI or replacing
it. Perhaps because I'm tainted by Zope 2's idea of the ZMI, though.
I'm fairly sure the idea with Zope 3 was to be able to re-use
Nuxeo, with the kind help of the Zope team of Chalmers
University, plans to organise a Zope 3 sprint on April 3-7 in our
premises in Paris.
The focus of the sprint, like last year's successful sprint, will be ECM
(Enterprise Content Management).
Last year's Paris sprint was a turning point for th
Martin Aspeli wrote:
On Thu, 02 Mar 2006 11:49:31 -, Lennart Regebro <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
This should be Zope3 as it is now. A couple of things can go away.
Maybe the rotterdam skin, I don't know. Definitely the default Folder
objects and such. People, especially Zope2 people, think
Is there any reason why zope.app.form.browser.widget.DisplayWidget
doesn’t implement zope.app.form.interfaces.IDisplayWidget,
or is this a bug?
- Shaun
___
Zope3-dev mailing list
Zope3-dev@zope.org
Unsub: http://mail.zope.org/mailm
On Mar 3, 2006, at 3:08 AM, Max M wrote:
Splitting up Zope to let people use seperate pieces of Zope aka Zed
is not a valid reason. Good software practise is a valid reason.
But catering for those few developers that wants to use just a few
pieces is probably not worth the effort.
Here's o
Terry Hancock wrote:
On Tue, 28 Feb 2006 16:41:08 +0100
Martijn Faassen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Could you please stop using a new name for Zope 3 or the
zope package? You can explain this perfectly well using
the existing, well established names.
I strongly disagree with this sentiment.
Jim Fulton wrote:
[snip]
I think that having one name for two radically different, though related,
things is very confusing. There are really
2 main technologies that people care about:
1. The Zope app server. This is characterized by things like an object
file system, through-the-web scripti
Jim Fulton wrote:
Martijn Faassen wrote:
[snip]
Sounds like the original vision of Zope 3 without the X. I thought we
never got around to developing this stuff the last time.
Actually, no. We originally said that we would provide a transition
path. I said over and over that this was *not* g
For sure the past two days threads are raising my concern...
We are using Zope3 internally, with profit.
We have followed all the change of directions in the roadmap, since the
initial vision:
Designer/scripter/developer, TTW, ZCML for scripters/administrators, a
beautiful framework for deve
I like this a whole lot. This is *much* better than diluting the Zope
brand (Zed is dead, baby). If people really say things like "Oh, I
can't use zope.testbrowser because I'm not using Zope" it's time to
school them, not to ruin our brand: "You only need the Zope CA for
that, dude, so stop
23 matches
Mail list logo
