--On 18. Januar 2007 08:29:57 -0500 Fred Drake <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On 1/18/07, Andreas Jung <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
We're faster with new Zope versions than the W3C with any standard.
So? The recommendation for XML 1.1 is already a done deal (a "second
edition" was published last
On 18 Jan 2007, at 09:53 , Chris Withers wrote:
Philipp von Weitershausen wrote:
If it is, then which of the following should I use to register a
generic adapter for any single object to an interface:
provideAdapter(...,adapts=(None,),...)
This one.
Given that you can register adapters for
Philipp von Weitershausen wrote:
Baiju M wrote:
[snip]
>
> I thought we can create individual eggs instead of a big zope.app
> egg for Zope 3.4.
Well, I don't think we have to make every single subpackage its own
egg. We should pick our battles and start with those individual eggs
that c
On 1/18/07, Andreas Jung <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
We're faster with new Zope versions than the W3C with any standard.
So? The recommendation for XML 1.1 is already a done deal (a "second
edition" was published last September), so there are already multiple
specified versions. Since other ve
On Thu, Jan 18, 2007 at 08:53:36AM +, Chris Withers wrote:
> Philipp von Weitershausen wrote:
> >>If it is, then which of the following should I use to register a
> >>generic adapter for any single object to an interface:
> >>
> >>provideAdapter(...,adapts=(None,),...)
> >
> >This one.
>
> Gi
On Thu, Jan 18, 2007 at 08:55:17AM +, Chris Withers wrote:
> Marius Gedminas wrote:
> >BTW passing interfaces to provideAdapter/ is out of fashion.
>
> This stuff is getting almost perl-ish in it's "there's many ways to do
> it, pick the style you like" nature..
There's a slight difference,
Philipp von Weitershausen wrote:
Code like this won't be run with python -O (which is what you'd
obviously use in production).
obviously... not.
How many people actually do this?
I wonder whether a different approach could be taken. The APIDOC code
does already a registration analysis. Maybe
Philipp von Weitershausen wrote:
If it is, then which of the following should I use to register a
generic adapter for any single object to an interface:
provideAdapter(...,adapts=(None,),...)
This one.
Given that you can register adapters for any class, whether or not it
implements any int
Marius Gedminas wrote:
BTW passing interfaces to provideAdapter/ is out of fashion.
This stuff is getting almost perl-ish in it's "there's many ways to do
it, pick the style you like" nature..
I
prefer using zope.component.adapts and zope.interface.implements (or
zope.component.adapter and
