On 26.06.2007, at 21:44, Gary Poster wrote:
On Jun 26, 2007, at 3:29 PM, Bernd Dorn wrote:
On 23.06.2007, at 12:38, Christian Theune wrote:
Am Samstag, den 23.06.2007, 07:04 -0400 schrieb Gary Poster:
Hey Christian. I intend to check in some code that fixes
zope.app.keyreference
On 2007-06-26 22:41:25 +0200, Gary Poster [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
On Jun 23, 2007, at 6:38 AM, Christian Zagrodnick wrote:
Log message for revision 76975:
FileWidget tries to be smarter about not deleting the currently
stored content when the user did not upload a new file.
...
On Jun 27, 2007, at 2:49 AM, Christian Zagrodnick wrote:
On 2007-06-26 22:41:25 +0200, Gary Poster [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
On Jun 23, 2007, at 6:38 AM, Christian Zagrodnick wrote:
Log message for revision 76975:
FileWidget tries to be smarter about not deleting the
currently stored
Hi. I've tended to use system python against some better advice, but use
but leave it clean since I am using buildouts. This really has had more
to do with the convenience of using the system package tools for
upgrading such as FreeBSD ports system. I've also been experimenting
with CentOS and
--On 27. Juni 2007 11:36:23 -0300 David Pratt [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi. I've tended to use system python against some better advice, but use
but leave it clean since I am using buildouts. This really has had more
to do with the convenience of using the system package tools for
upgrading
On 27.06.2007, at 16:01, Christian Theune wrote:
Hi,
the recent introduction of zope.app.keyreference-3.5dev with it's
dependency on ZODB 3.9 brought some issues for me as I get
conflicts in
various buildouts (e.g. z3c.zalchemy).
In my example, z3c.zalchemy doesn't care about which
On Jun 27, 2007, at 2:30 AM, Bernd Dorn wrote:
On 26.06.2007, at 21:44, Gary Poster wrote:
On Jun 26, 2007, at 3:29 PM, Bernd Dorn wrote:
i think as long the package has a dev dependency like ZODB 3.9 it
should at least have alpha or beta status
Hi Bernd.
Why?
because it pulls in
On Jun 27, 2007, at 10:01 AM, Christian Theune wrote:
Hi,
the recent introduction of zope.app.keyreference-3.5dev with it's
dependency on ZODB 3.9 brought some issues for me as I get
conflicts in
various buildouts (e.g. z3c.zalchemy).
In my example, z3c.zalchemy doesn't care about which
Am Mittwoch, den 27.06.2007, 11:36 -0400 schrieb Gary Poster:
My current opinion is that version numbers are the best solution of a
bad lot.
My current opinion is that we don't have a final story on how all the
pieces we have now: multiple eggs with seperate lives, buildout,
setuptools,
Gary Poster wrote:
On Jun 27, 2007, at 12:21 PM, Jürgen Kartnaller wrote:
We store 100K relations this way.
Cool.
ZODB loads the referenced objects on demand.
Very true.
Additionally, I imagine Jürgen is using integer tokens, such as intids,
to represent the objects within the
10 matches
Mail list logo
