Previously Jim Fulton wrote:
Any objections?
This would basically involve retiring the zope3-dev list and moving
zope3 developers to the zope-dev list.
+1
Wichert.
--
Wichert Akkerman [EMAIL PROTECTED]It is simple to make things.
http://www.wiggy.net/ It is hard
Previously Stephan Richter wrote:
I totally disagree. If we trust people with repository access, then we have
to
trust them with release making. If you subscribe to the egg process, you have
to do frequent releases.
Why would eggs require more frequent releases?
Wichert.
--
Wichert
Stephan Richter wrote:
On Wednesday 26 September 2007 09:20, Wichert Akkerman wrote:
Previously Stephan Richter wrote:
I totally disagree. If we trust people with repository access, then we
have to trust them with release making. If you subscribe to the egg
process, you have to do
repository for that project.
Wichert.
--
Wichert Akkerman [EMAIL PROTECTED]It is simple to make things.
http://www.wiggy.net/ It is hard to make things simple.
___
Zope3-dev mailing list
Zope3-dev@zope.org
Unsub: http
I noticed that z3c.widget has a tagged release on svn but there is no
cheeseshop entry for it. Is that on purpose? It would be practical to
have it registered there.
Wichert.
--
Wichert Akkerman [EMAIL PROTECTED]It is simple to make things.
http://www.wiggy.net/ It is hard
Jodok Batlogg wrote:
On 18.09.2007, at 23:29, Wichert Akkerman wrote:
I noticed that z3c.widget has a tagged release on svn but there is no
cheeseshop entry for it. Is that on purpose? It would be practical to
have it registered there.
you bring up an interesting point...
the current
Previously Marius Gedminas wrote:
On Fri, Aug 31, 2007 at 01:21:08PM +0200, Christian Theune wrote:
Am Freitag, den 31.08.2007, 13:06 +0200 schrieb Wichert Akkerman:
Is there documentation on sources anywhere? The last time I checked
there was nothing that I could understand either
Tres Seaver wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Philipp von Weitershausen wrote:
On 4 Sep 2007, at 01:21 , Tres Seaver wrote:
Philipp von Weitershausen wrote:
Wichert Akkerman wrote:
The only problem is that distributing grok-0.11.cfg is a bit
.
--
Wichert Akkerman [EMAIL PROTECTED]It is simple to make things.
http://www.wiggy.net/ It is hard to make things simple.
___
Zope3-dev mailing list
Zope3-dev@zope.org
Unsub: http://mail.zope.org/mailman/options/zope3-dev/archive%40mail
.* or
on the wiki.
Wichert.
--
Wichert Akkerman [EMAIL PROTECTED]It is simple to make things.
http://www.wiggy.net/ It is hard to make things simple.
___
Zope3-dev mailing list
Zope3-dev@zope.org
Unsub: http://mail.zope.org/mailman/options
.
--
Wichert Akkerman [EMAIL PROTECTED]It is simple to make things.
http://www.wiggy.net/ It is hard to make things simple.
___
Zope3-dev mailing list
Zope3-dev@zope.org
Unsub: http://mail.zope.org/mailman/options/zope3-dev/archive%40mail
that 0.2 was not finished, perhaps it
should be removed from the cheeseshop as well?
Wichert.
--
Wichert Akkerman [EMAIL PROTECTED]It is simple to make things.
http://www.wiggy.net/ It is hard to make things simple.
___
Zope3-dev
.
Wichert.
--
Wichert Akkerman [EMAIL PROTECTED]It is simple to make things.
http://www.wiggy.net/ It is hard to make things simple.
___
Zope3-dev mailing list
Zope3-dev@zope.org
Unsub: http://mail.zope.org/mailman/options/zope3-dev
and looks like the if condition is
incorrect.
Wichert.
--
Wichert Akkerman [EMAIL PROTECTED]It is simple to make things.
http://www.wiggy.net/ It is hard to make things simple.
___
Zope3-dev mailing list
Zope3-dev@zope.org
Unsub: http
?
Wichert.
--
Wichert Akkerman [EMAIL PROTECTED]It is simple to make things.
http://www.wiggy.net/ It is hard to make things simple.
___
Zope3-dev mailing list
Zope3-dev@zope.org
Unsub: http://mail.zope.org/mailman/options/zope3-dev
wrong.
I don't understand that. Having to maintain duplicate unit tests or
duplicate documents sounds like the exact same amount of duplicate work
and problems to me. Why do you consider duplicate documents to be more
problematic?
Wichert.
--
Wichert Akkerman [EMAIL PROTECTED]It is simple
/checker.py,
line 420, in ?
AttributeError: 'module' object has no attribute 'thread_local'
I see the same thing: create a new project with grokproject, run
bin/zopectl fg and it aborts with that error.
Wichert.
--
Wichert Akkerman [EMAIL PROTECTED]It is simple to make things.
http://www.wiggy.net
.
This is deeper than I thought. b3 doesn't work either. It looks like the
merge from the branch with support for Python 2.5 is causing the
problems.
I can confirm that the last release before the python 2.5 support was
added (3.4.0-b2) works correctly.
Wichert.
--
Wichert Akkerman [EMAIL PROTECTED
/wichert/buildout-eggs/tmpG_NQ4q/zope.security-3.4.0b3-py2.4-linux-i686.egg/zope/security/checker.py,
line 420, in ?
AttributeError: 'module' object has no attribute 'thread_local'
Wichert.
--
Wichert Akkerman [EMAIL PROTECTED]It is simple to make things.
http://www.wiggy.net
have to step through the test with pdb, at which point it
becomes very painful.
Wichert.
--
Wichert Akkerman [EMAIL PROTECTED]It is simple to make things.
http://www.wiggy.net/ It is hard to make things simple.
___
Zope3-dev
use cases, for which doctests are best suited.
Amen. I find failing doctests to be much harder to debug as well. I use
doctests as a method to make sure examples in my documentation are
correct, which is very useful.
Wichert.
--
Wichert Akkerman [EMAIL PROTECTED]It is simple to make things
on the file
last and when the work was done. I find it inconvenient to make another SVN
call to get this information.
Their major downside is that they cause a lot of polution when diffing
trees.
Wichert.
--
Wichert Akkerman [EMAIL PROTECTED]It is simple to make things.
http
Previously Christian Theune wrote:
Well. This depends. If you want to enable eggs to work against unstable
releases then you need to do 3.3, because:
3.3 3.4dev 3.4a 3.4(.0)
But =3.4dev should always work, right?
Wichert.
--
Wichert Akkerman [EMAIL PROTECTED]It is simple to make
Previously Martijn Faassen wrote:
Wichert Akkerman wrote:
Previously Uwe Oestermeier wrote:
Martijn Faassen [EMAIL PROTECTED] schreibt:
Now I'm hoping I'm missing some kind of strategy and perhaps someone
will have a luminous idea to make this work without the creation of a
separate index
I can see most people, use SimpleTAL
(http://www.owlfish.com/software/simpleTAL/) if I need to use TAL
outside of Zope. It's very small and has no dependencies.
Wichert.
--
Wichert Akkerman [EMAIL PROTECTED]It is simple to make things.
http://www.wiggy.net/ It is hard
processing and the publisher intact.
Two possible things come to mind:
- if the tempfile is on a different filesystem you can not link the file
elsehere. Can we guarantee that they will be on the same filesystem?
- does this work on non-posix systems such as windows?
Wichert.
--
Wichert Akkerman
I expect to see
SOAP used more rather than less.
Wichert.
--
Wichert Akkerman [EMAIL PROTECTED]It is simple to make things.
http://www.wiggy.net/ It is hard to make things simple.
___
Zope3-dev mailing list
Zope3-dev@zope.org
Previously Patrick Gerken wrote:
On 1/8/07, Wichert Akkerman [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
There is large amount of SOAP deployed and all the .NET development
suites I'm familiar with make using SOAP really easy, so I expect to see
SOAP used more rather than less.
As I dont work with .NET, can
with Buffet and then available to TurboGears, Pylons, web.py,
whatever.
There is a growing number of projects that use SimpleTAL.
Wichert.
--
Wichert Akkerman [EMAIL PROTECTED]It is simple to make things.
http://www.wiggy.net/ It is hard to make things simple
Previously Chris Withers wrote:
Really? Certainly in Zope 2, prettymuch every persistent objects needs
to be getId()'able...
The fact that something is true in Zope 3 does not necessarily make it a
good idea.
Wichert.
--
Wichert Akkerman [EMAIL PROTECTED]It is simple to make things
Previously Stephan Richter wrote:
On Wednesday 29 November 2006 03:37, Wichert Akkerman wrote:
The fact that something is true in Zope 3 does not necessarily make it a
good idea.
But the chances are pretty high! ;-)
Of course I meant to say 'Zope 2' there, which does reduce the chances
or non-existing of a corresponding .py file a good
indication?
Wichert.
--
Wichert Akkerman [EMAIL PROTECTED]It is simple to make things.
http://www.wiggy.net/ It is hard to make things simple.
___
Zope3-dev mailing list
Zope3-dev
from spam at some point. For dev.plone.org we
disabled anonymous ticket creation and modification. Since creating a
plone.org is trivial that has not been a problem.
Also, trac 0.10 has just been released which has some spam filtering
hooks that might be useful.
Wichert.
--
Wichert Akkerman
the repository browser from trac trac needs filesystem
access to the repository
- for the commit/issue linking magic (commits automatically
updating/closing tickets) pretty much any communication channel
between a post-commit hook in the repository and trac can suffice.
Wichert.
--
Wichert Akkerman
accurate than a single revision number.
Wichert.
--
Wichert Akkerman [EMAIL PROTECTED]It is simple to make things.
http://www.wiggy.net/ It is hard to make things simple.
___
Zope3-dev mailing list
Zope3-dev@zope.org
Unsub: http
Previously Philipp von Weitershausen wrote:
Jim Fulton wrote:
Uh, why are we parsing the entries file?
To get the current revision of the Zope 3 checkout...
Why not use svn info --xml?
Wichert.
--
Wichert Akkerman [EMAIL PROTECTED]It is simple to make things.
http://www.wiggy.net
know of plenty of versioning
schemas that use 1.0a, 1.0b, 1.0c, etc to represent bug releases. With
'rc' it doesn't conflict with any known versioning schemes that I'm
aware of.
-1 on c1
+1 on rc1
-1 on c1 and +1 on rc1 here as well, for the same reasons.
Wichert.
--
Wichert Akkerman
Previously Anton Stonor wrote:
Philipp von Weitershausen wrote:
Shall we release once every 9 months from now on?
9 months pregnancy -- that's almost poetic.
And painful to deliver?
Wichert.
--
Wichert Akkerman [EMAIL PROTECTED]It is simple to make things.
http://www.wiggy.net
domain in its header; I'm assuming zope is smart
enough to extract and use that. If not - please fix that :)
Wichert.
--
Wichert Akkerman [EMAIL PROTECTED]It is simple to make things.
http://www.wiggy.net/ It is hard to make things simple
on modern 32bit
and a 64bit systems. Until then it's all hand-waiving.
Wichert.
--
Wichert Akkerman [EMAIL PROTECTED]It is simple to make things.
http://www.wiggy.net/ It is hard to make things simple.
___
Zope3-dev mailing list
unencrypted data ever being
written to persistent storage (even temporarily).
Can you transfer the data through a unix domain socket or a pipe?
Wichert.
--
Wichert Akkerman [EMAIL PROTECTED]It is simple to make things.
http://www.wiggy.net/ It is hard to make things simple
self.assert_(is_started, spawned process failed to start in a minute)
File /usr/lib/python2.3/unittest.py, line 278, in failUnless
if not expr: raise self.failureException, msg
AssertionError: spawned process failed to start in a minute
Wichert.
--
Wichert Akkerman [EMAIL PROTECTED
Previously Stephan Richter wrote:
I always ignore this one ;-)
If it is something to be ignored shouldn't be disabled? Having a known
failure in the unittests is kind of bad.
Wichert.
--
Wichert Akkerman [EMAIL PROTECTED]It is simple to make things.
http://www.wiggy.net
://www.zope.org/Collectors/Zope3-dev/430
No, that item is fixed: the donothing script is properly marked as
executable both in the svn repo and in my checkout.
Wichert.
--
Wichert Akkerman [EMAIL PROTECTED]It is simple to make things.
http://www.wiggy.net/ It is hard to make things
44 matches
Mail list logo
