Philipp von Weitershausen wrote:
Martijn suggests to just use user. I can live with that. The reason
why I didn't propose that is because I thought people still valued the
abstraction of a principal as opposed to the physical person. I don't
need it and all those Unix users out there don't seem
Tim Peters wrote:
BTW, Microsoft no longer sells VC6.
Indeed, this was my understanding...
Nevertheless, does anyone know how to legally get hold of these?
(Hmmm... I work in amoungst a horde of MS developers here, maybe one of
them will know...)
Also, how can I build both 2.3 and 2.4
Benji York wrote:
It's more that I'm reluctant to figure out how they've changed the
system since the last public release, make the modifications, test them,
produce patches, and then persuade them to accept them. All that takes
time that is presently better spent on other things.
Ah
Stephan Richter wrote:
Oh :-( That sucks. Is there a DBAPI sig for python that we should be
talking to about getting that fixed?
There is a sig and we could try. But I have *very* little hope that such a
proposal would come to fruition. Most applications don't really care about
supporting
Roger Ineichen wrote:
Hi principals
*shrug* I'm a user :).
Since principal doesn't seem to be a common term in IT speak either,
translators repeatedly have their problems with it. In German, for
example, we came up with Nutzungsberechtigter which is just an
arbitrary choice and doesn't even fit
Jean-Marc Orliaguet wrote:
is the order of the list of interfaces implemented by an object subject
to internal changes?
I have identified the need for such a pattern:
iface = object.interface()
with:
class someObject(object):
implements(IMainInterface, ISecondaryInterface,
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Lennart Regebro wrote:
On 9/12/05, Olivier Grisel [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Lennart Regebro wrote:
This is unfortunately not a public area. But you can grab funkload from
the public svn:
*slaps forehead* You are right, I only saw that public in
On 9/13/05, Philipp von Weitershausen [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Perhaps it is helpful to describe what a principal really are.
A principal object represents the security context of the user on whose
behalf the code is running, including the user's identity, groups and
roles to which
Chris Withers wrote:
Tim Peters wrote:
Or you can fetch the compiled .pyds from my member page, as the
current Windows build-bot slaves do (see the wget PYDs log and
unzip PYDs log steps from the Windows 2000 fred-win column at
http://buildbot.zope.org/).
Sorry, just re-read this, now I'm
Janko Hauser wrote:
Am 13.09.2005 um 12:43 schrieb Jean-Marc Orliaguet:
But where do you put the 'directlyProvides' statement? in the class :
Can't this be put in the interface definition module for
IContentType? You mark other interfaces with the interface IContentType.
__Janko
I
Jean-Marc Orliaguet wrote:
...
the idea is that you define as many categories as you need: IMetaType,
ISomeCategory, IWidgetType ... and you create relations between
interfaces with:
directlyProvides(IFile, IContentType)
Exactly.
as if you had a relation tool,
There are all sorts of
[Tim Peters]
BTW, Microsoft no longer sells VC6.
[Chris Withers]
Indeed, this was my understanding...
Nevertheless, does anyone know how to legally get hold of these?
(Hmmm... I work in amoungst a horde of MS developers here, maybe one of
them will know...)
Go to
Philipp von Weitershausen wrote:
Martijn suggests to just use user. I can live with that. The reason
why I didn't propose that is because I thought people still valued the
abstraction of a principal as opposed to the physical person. I don't
need it and all those Unix users out there don't
Hi Philipp
Regards
Roger Ineichen
Projekt01 GmbH
www.projekt01.ch
_
END OF MESSAGE
-Original Message-
From: Philipp von Weitershausen [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, September 13, 2005 9:31 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: zope3-dev@zope.org;
On 9/12/05, Tonico Strasser [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Philipp von Weitershausen schrieb:
...
So, I would like to give principal a better name. How about
participant? After all, a principal _participates_ in an interaction
through a participation (e.g. an HTTP request). Participant should
Tom von Schwerdtner wrote:
It might be worth considering that the term user has a mostly
negative connotation in English (at least in the USA).
In tech circles, user is completely neutral and safe. However, in
slang, sometimes drug user is shortened to user.
Shane
Steve Alexander wrote:
In Launchpad, request.principal is not used by the application
programmers. It is used only by the authentication, authorization and
publication machinery. The machinery looks up a Person (an application
domain object) for the current principal (the participant, if you
On 9/13/05, Shane Hathaway [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
It sounds like you're saying only the security machinery should know
about principals, and that everything else deals with users. If so, it
should not be necessary for any Zope 3 developer to learn about
principals unless they are writing
Shane Hathaway wrote:
Steve Alexander wrote:
In Launchpad, request.principal is not used by the application
programmers. It is used only by the authentication, authorization and
publication machinery. The machinery looks up a Person (an application
domain object) for the current principal
Hi Shane
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Shane Hathaway
Sent: Tuesday, September 13, 2005 7:34 PM
To: Steve Alexander
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [Zope3-dev] RFC: Rename principal to participant
Steve Alexander wrote:
I think so too. But I whould not try to explain a PAU (pluggable
authentication utility) without to use the word principal. I think
using the words user or participant for a principal in this case is
not a good idea.
Perhaps the scope of the PUA can be extended to have a plug-in factory
for
On Tue, Sep 13, 2005 at 12:08:40PM +0200, Sebastien Douche wrote:
| On 9/13/05, Philipp von Weitershausen [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
| I wonder, for
| example, which term French speakers use when they *talk* to each other
| about principals... French is known to be very conservative when it
|
Dear All,
zope.server.serverchannelbase.received requires preq, an
IStreamConsumer, to have a boolean attribute named `empty' that is not
mentioned in the interface. A patch against the trunk (rev 38459) is
attached, which adds this attribute to the interface.
Thanks.
Chad Whitacre
23 matches
Mail list logo
