Re: [Zope3-dev] zope.testing.testrunner: issue with remove_stale_bytecode

2006-10-11 Thread Chris Withers
Hi Paul, Paul Winkler wrote: But this conflicts with third parties being able to deliver bytecode instead of source, which is a standard python feature (if not common in the zope world). Since we can't tell the difference between stale and we never had source in the first place, deleting

[Zope3-dev] how to override zope.app.securitypolicy sanely

2006-10-11 Thread Adam Groszer
Hi, For our application the standard securitypolicy was fine. Until today. Now a requirement came up that the object permissions have to depend _also_ on an object state (the object's property). As I checked my friend is the zope.app.securitypolicy.zopepolicy.py. Securitypolicy gets set in the

Re: [Zope3-dev] how to override zope.app.securitypolicy sanely

2006-10-11 Thread Christian Theune
Hi, Adam Groszer wrote: Hi, For our application the standard securitypolicy was fine. Until today. Now a requirement came up that the object permissions have to depend _also_ on an object state (the object's property). As I checked my friend is the zope.app.securitypolicy.zopepolicy.py.

Re: [Zope3-dev] how to override zope.app.securitypolicy sanely

2006-10-11 Thread Benji York
Adam Groszer wrote: For our application the standard securitypolicy was fine. Until today. Now a requirement came up that the object permissions have to depend _also_ on an object state (the object's property). zc.sharing might be a good fit. You'll have to change the sharing settings on the

Re: [Zope3-dev] Buildbot for individual packages

2006-10-11 Thread Benji York
Baiju M wrote: Hi all, Since we are going for eggification, it is necessary to add buildbot support for indiviaul packages. Generally: yes. The reason being to allow the individual packages to be self-contained when it comes to development and testing. Can we make sure 'python

Re: [Zope3-dev] zope.testing.testrunner: issue with remove_stale_bytecode

2006-10-11 Thread Paul Winkler
On Tue, Oct 10, 2006 at 08:13:23PM -0400, Jim Fulton wrote: Paul Winkler wrote: Posting this here because the code in question lives in zope.testing... After accidentally nuking my mxODBCZopeDA installation simply by running bin/zopectl test in a zope 2.9 instance, I quickly concluded:

Re: [Zope3-dev] zope.testing.testrunner: issue with remove_stale_bytecode

2006-10-11 Thread Andrew Bennetts
Paul Winkler wrote: On Tue, Oct 10, 2006 at 08:13:23PM -0400, Jim Fulton wrote: [...] See: http://www.python.org/pypi/zope.testing#running-without-source-code Thanks for the pointer. AFAICT the current docs confirm my understanding. --usecompiled would be useful if I wanted to run tests

Re: [Zope3-dev] zope.testing.testrunner: issue with remove_stale_bytecode

2006-10-11 Thread Wichert Akkerman
Previously Andrew Bennetts wrote: The real problem as you noted in your original message is that there's no way to distinguish between a pyc file that is only intended to be used as a cache of bytecode for a py file, and a pyc file that is intended to be used standalone. Isn't the existing

Re: [Zope3-dev] zope.testing.testrunner: issue with remove_stale_bytecode

2006-10-11 Thread Jim Fulton
Wichert Akkerman wrote: Previously Andrew Bennetts wrote: The real problem as you noted in your original message is that there's no way to distinguish between a pyc file that is only intended to be used as a cache of bytecode for a py file, and a pyc file that is intended to be used standalone.

[Zope3-dev] Re: zope.testing.testrunner: issue with remove_stale_bytecode

2006-10-11 Thread Tres Seaver
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Jim Fulton wrote: Wichert Akkerman wrote: Previously Andrew Bennetts wrote: The real problem as you noted in your original message is that there's no way to distinguish between a pyc file that is only intended to be used as a cache of bytecode

Re: [Zope3-dev] zope.testing.testrunner: issue with remove_stale_bytecode

2006-10-11 Thread Paul Winkler
On Wed, Oct 11, 2006 at 11:43:13PM +0200, Wichert Akkerman wrote: Previously Andrew Bennetts wrote: The real problem as you noted in your original message is that there's no way to distinguish between a pyc file that is only intended to be used as a cache of bytecode for a py file,

Re: Re: [Zope3-dev] Grrr. zope.org wikis are evil.

2006-10-11 Thread Jeff Shell
On 10/7/06, Jim Fulton [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Fred Drake wrote: So whatever the ZF's plans for dealing with zope.org, I think there's no way to go wrong with the wikis except by keeping what we have now. While it's nice to use a Zope-based solution, I think we need to just get a solution