Tres Seaver wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Stephan Richter wrote:
On Wednesday 15 August 2007 08:01, Christian Theune wrote:
zope.traversing has a dependency to zope.app.applicationcontroller. This
is because zope.traversing implements the "etc" namespace and has a hard
c
The cheeseshop lists a 0.2 version of z3c.zalchemy but in subversion I
only see tags for 0.1 and 0.1.1. svn trunk lists 0.2 as unreleased in
CHANGES.txt.
What is the status of z3c.zalchemy 0.2? Is it really released, or does
the cheeseshop show what is really a development snapshot as 0.2?
Wicher
Am Donnerstag, den 16.08.2007, 13:37 +0200 schrieb Wichert Akkerman:
> The cheeseshop lists a 0.2 version of z3c.zalchemy but in subversion I
> only see tags for 0.1 and 0.1.1. svn trunk lists 0.2 as unreleased in
> CHANGES.txt.
>
> What is the status of z3c.zalchemy 0.2? Is it really released, or
Was this problem related to Python 2.5 update ?
I checked Nikhil's (GSoC student) commit (r78089), but cann't find any issue
with that changes.
Index: CHANGES.txt
===
--- CHANGES.txt(revision 78088)
+++ CHANGES.txt(revision
Philipp von Weitershausen wrote:
[snip]
This is a surprise to me, having worked on zc.zope3recipes recently. All
tests pass here (though I'm on MacOSX, haven't tested Linux yet):
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:~/dev/zc.zope3recipes$ bin/test -v
Running tests at level 1
Running unit tests:
Running:
.
Christian Theune wrote:
Am Mittwoch, den 15.08.2007, 17:59 +0200 schrieb Martijn Faassen:
Where is this b5? I am still getting b4, not b5. I can't find b5 on the
server.
I've put it there now. The actual distribution was missing. I've created
the b5 tag and uploaded the sdist package.
Thanks
Am Donnerstag, den 16.08.2007, 17:36 +0530 schrieb Baiju M:
> Was this problem related to Python 2.5 update ?
It was not, it was just a suspicion of me and it was wrong.
___
Zope3-dev mailing list
Zope3-dev@zope.org
Unsub: http://mail.zope.org/mailman/
Hi there,
I don't have any Windows knowledge, so my ability to review Roger's
changes to add (much needed!) windows support to z3.zope3recipes is
limited.
I do however notice that an entire doctest was more or less copied
verbatim: README.txt got copied to WINDOWS.txt. The Windows version ha
Martijn Faassen wrote:
Given the momentary confusion surrounding the release of a broken
package. By broken package in this case I mean something which seriously
breaks many many Zope 3 installations in an obvious way.
I think it might be wise to start working out some procedure surrounding
s
Martijn Faassen wrote:
These are all the changes in the test code I can detect. It therefore
seems quite feasible to merge them into a single test again, if at least
we can work out the buildout output differences.
+1
It may be possible through the use of a normalizer and different setup
cod
Am Donnerstag, den 16.08.2007, 09:02 -0400 schrieb Benji York:
> Martijn Faassen wrote:
> > These are all the changes in the test code I can detect. It therefore
> > seems quite feasible to merge them into a single test again, if at least
> > we can work out the buildout output differences.
>
>
Previously Martijn Faassen wrote:
> Hi there,
>
> I don't have any Windows knowledge, so my ability to review Roger's
> changes to add (much needed!) windows support to z3.zope3recipes is
> limited.
>
> I do however notice that an entire doctest was more or less copied
> verbatim: README.txt g
Christian Theune wrote:
Am Donnerstag, den 16.08.2007, 09:02 -0400 schrieb Benji York:
Martijn Faassen wrote:
These are all the changes in the test code I can detect. It therefore
seems quite feasible to merge them into a single test again, if at least
we can work out the buildout output diffe
Wichert Akkerman wrote:
Previously Martijn Faassen wrote:
I don't have any Windows knowledge, so my ability to review Roger's
changes to add (much needed!) windows support to z3.zope3recipes is
limited.
I do however notice that an entire doctest was more or less copied
verbatim: README.txt g
On Aug 16, 2007, at 8:06 AM, Baiju M wrote:
Was this problem related to Python 2.5 update ?
Not AFAICT. It was die to a circular import problem that I introduced.
Jim
--
Jim Fulton mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]Python
Powered!
CTO
Hello Benji,
Had some time to merge it to the trunk.
I would say it's time now to kill/remove/delete the ClientForm and
mechanize stored on the trunk. Any objections?
Thursday, August 9, 2007, 2:20:27 PM, you wrote:
> Adam Groszer wrote:
>> Hello Fred,
>>
>> I'll say silence is consent.
>> I'll
On Thursday 16 August 2007 08:52, Martijn Faassen wrote:
> Opinions?
I agree with your assessment. Only differences to the original README.txt file
should be in WINDOWS.txt. I would prefer two files over one file with
conditions.
Regards,
Stephan
--
Stephan Richter
CBU Physics & Chemistry (B.S
Hi there,
I'm trying on zc.zope3recipes on Windows. I notice that some of the
tests rely on a module called win32api, which I assume is in the Win32
extensions that I haven't installed in my windows Python yet.
Do we have to have win32api installed to make this work, or is it
possible to lif
On Thursday 16 August 2007 10:49, Martijn Faassen wrote:
> Was the original way to run Zope 3 trunk dependent on win32api?
No, buit it did not support deamonization either. You were on your own when
you wanted a Win service.
Regards,
Stephan
--
Stephan Richter
CBU Physics & Chemistry (B.S.) / T
On 8/16/07, Benji York <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> If buildout prefers "release" eggs, then only bad release eggs will
> cause the above problem. Coupled with nailed versions, there should be
> no reason for emergency communication or egg deletion. Having said
> that, I don't abhor the idea of a
Hi everyone,
it has been over a year, since we had a conference-independent fully Zope 3
focused sprint. And I think it is time to have one! :-)
Thanks to JSA Tech, there will be a sprint between September 24-28, 2007 right
in the center of historical Concord, Massachusetts. We have reserved a
Benji York wrote at 2007-8-16 08:59 -0400:
> ...
>I also recommend projects nail their version requirements so that no
>matter what someone releases, they will be unaffected. This is how we
>run the projects I'm involved in, and it helps that we can decide, on
>occasion, to pay off our version
Dieter Maurer wrote:
Precisely fixing the dependancies is a good thing for final
applications.
+1
It is bad for components or in situations where the given
application is composed from many mini-applications.
I don't agree, but as long as I'm not working on your components, I
don't
Martijn Faassen wrote:
I'm trying on zc.zope3recipes on Windows. I notice that some of the
tests rely on a module called win32api, which I assume is in the Win32
extensions that I haven't installed in my windows Python yet.
Do we have to have win32api installed to make this work, or is it
pos
Hi Martijn
> Betreff: [Zope3-dev] relying on win32api in windows support
> ofzc.zope3recipes
>
> Hi there,
>
> I'm trying on zc.zope3recipes on Windows. I notice that some
> of the tests rely on a module called win32api, which I assume
> is in the Win32 extensions that I haven't installed in
25 matches
Mail list logo
