Hi Stephan,
thanks for your input.
Good work. Here a general comment. Sometimes we broke up a package into
zope.X
and zope.app.X to have a very basic package for other projects and a more
Zope specific one. In this case you might want to merge the two, but this
would create new
Philipp von Weitershausen wrote:
It has been suggested several times (also by myself) to make zope.app
smaller, namely to move out all the stuff that's not exclusively needed
by the Zope 3 Application Server.
A good list of such packages are the ones used in Zope 2. An ultimate
goal would be
Jim Fulton wrote:
Obviously, I'm in favor of this. I fear though that this will cause me
a lot of pain. I'm in the middle of a bit of a geddon on the jim-adapter
branch. The valuable work you propose is probably going to make my merge
a lot harder. I hope to be ready to merge by branch in
Philipp von Weitershausen wrote:
Jim Fulton wrote:
Obviously, I'm in favor of this. I fear though that this will cause me
a lot of pain. I'm in the middle of a bit of a geddon on the jim-adapter
branch. The valuable work you propose is probably going to make my merge
a lot harder. I hope
Hi Jim and Philipp
[...]
What are the things that people could help you with?
When I get a bit further, it would help a lot if someone
could work on the new registration UI. If anyone is interested,
please let me know.
Perhaps we can do some work at the next Sprint here in switzerland.
On Saturday 25 March 2006 11:40, Philipp von Weitershausen wrote:
This list is incomplete, both in quantity and in quality. I'd still like
to share it with you at this point because I would really like to hear
your feedback and your ideas. For many of these I don't even have a
half-baked idea
