Hey,.
On Feb 1, 2008 4:09 PM, David Pratt [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
[snip]
It might be nice for the marketing of zope to give each set of eggs a
nice name. Just using familiar mozilla names as an illustration, see how
nice zope-thunderbird or zope-firefox look. So do away with the kgs in
the
On Friday 01 February 2008, Chris McDonough wrote:
If there will continue to be a release schedule for Zope 3, the appserver
It would reduce confusion to new users greatly to give the appserver
release a name other than Zope.
Well, we had to do the classic Zope 3 release at least one more
Tom Hoffman wrote:
On Fri, Feb 1, 2008 at 9:22 AM, Chris McDonough [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I'll take a risk by stating the obvious.
If there will continue to be a release schedule for Zope 3, the appserver It
would reduce confusion to new users greatly to give the appserver release a
name
On Feb 1, 2008, at 9:42 AM, Chris McDonough wrote:
Tom Hoffman wrote:
On Fri, Feb 1, 2008 at 9:22 AM, Chris McDonough [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
I'll take a risk by stating the obvious.
If there will continue to be a release schedule for Zope 3, the
appserver It
would reduce confusion to
Not responding to anyone in particular:
I see there are plenty people with opinions. I would love not to do the Zope 3
releases anymore! I am tired of the endless discussions.
Think I am frustrated? Absolutely!
All the suggestions made here require more work, more manpower. But there is
Stephan Richter wrote:
On Friday 01 February 2008, Chris McDonough wrote:
If there will continue to be a release schedule for Zope 3, the appserver
It would reduce confusion to new users greatly to give the appserver
release a name other than Zope.
Well, we had to do the classic Zope 3
Hi Martijn. I am familiar with grok and the fun and welcoming community
you have created. With the perspective I have suggested, releases are
only sets with different names giving meaning to each set for developer
groups.
As a project, grok is currently pinning eggs but can also provide a kgs
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Chris McDonough wrote:
Stephan Richter wrote:
On Friday 01 February 2008, Chris McDonough wrote:
If there will continue to be a release schedule for Zope 3, the appserver
It would reduce confusion to new users greatly to give the appserver
I'll take a risk by stating the obvious.
If there will continue to be a release schedule for Zope 3, the appserver It
would reduce confusion to new users greatly to give the appserver release a name
other than Zope.
Eg.
Current name Proposed name
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Chris McDonough wrote:
Stephan Richter wrote:
On Friday 01 February 2008, Chris McDonough wrote:
If there will continue to be a release schedule for Zope 3, the appserver
It would reduce confusion to new users greatly to give the appserver
On Friday 01 February 2008, Tres Seaver wrote:
I typed four more paragraphs full of markety stuff here but deleted them.
It's not useful. If no one else thinks it's a good idea, I'm not going
to push either.
I would favor the following for a roadmap going forward:
- No more tarball
Hey,
On Feb 1, 2008 6:04 PM, Christophe Combelles [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
[snip]
The transition seems now achieved and the most important thing is to have a
dedicated web site with clear information, so that there are new users, and
new
contributors. When someone goes to the zope.org
Hey,
On Feb 1, 2008 6:11 PM, Stephan Richter [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Friday 01 February 2008, Martijn Faassen wrote:
http://www.openplans.org/projects/zorg-redux
This project does not seem to be public.
I don't know how it's been setup, but if you want to join I'm sure
Martin Aspeli can
Stephan Richter a écrit :
Not responding to anyone in particular:
I see there are plenty people with opinions. I would love not to do the Zope 3
releases anymore! I am tired of the endless discussions.
Think I am frustrated? Absolutely!
All the suggestions made here require more work, more
On Friday 01 February 2008, Martijn Faassen wrote:
http://www.openplans.org/projects/zorg-redux
This project does not seem to be public.
Regards,
Stephan
--
Stephan Richter
Web Software Design, Development and Training
Google me. Zope Stephan Richter
On Fri, Feb 01, 2008 at 11:06:48AM -0500, Chris McDonough wrote:
I typed four more paragraphs full of markety stuff here but deleted them.
*cheers*
Marius Gedminas
--
The clothes have no emperor.
-- C.A.R. Hoare, commenting on ADA.
signature.asc
Description: Digital
Hey,
On Feb 1, 2008 8:59 PM, Paul Carduner [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
[snip]
I think the website is one of the huge impediments to joining the Zope
community. When you compare zope.org to all the other web framework
websites like django, turbogears, and RoR, it is pretty clear why
people
Stephan Richter wrote:
If you use buildout, there is a recipe for creating a test runner. See
http://svn.zope.org/zope.kgs/trunk/?rev=83325
for a good example.
Where's the actual test runner or test runner creater?
Also, what's the best way to indicate in setup.py that my package needs
I'll take that as STFU ;-)
Got it.
- C
Marius Gedminas wrote:
On Fri, Feb 01, 2008 at 11:06:48AM -0500, Chris McDonough wrote:
I typed four more paragraphs full of markety stuff here but deleted them.
*cheers*
Marius Gedminas
Stephan Richter wrote:
On Friday 01 February 2008, Martijn Faassen wrote:
http://www.openplans.org/projects/zorg-redux
This project does not seem to be public.
Right - thanks Martijn for spilling the beans prematurely. ;-)
We haven't wanted to make too much of a splash about this until we
Martin Aspeli wrote:
I think you're right on the money. I really have very little idea of how
Zope 3 is supposed to be used right now, or what Zope 3 really is (and
no-one fully agrees, as evidenced by other posts in this thread). Having
to piece together that information from the mailing
21 matches
Mail list logo
