Hi,
i am searching for a possibility to create and remove content objects in Python
Code.
Thanks for replies,
___
Zope3-users mailing list
Zope3-users@zope.org
http://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope3-users
On Thu, 02 Mar 2006 00:42:14 -, Jeff Shell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
Personally, I still find it hard to know where the line goes between the
ZMI and my own UI code, if I should be extending the ZMI or replacing it.
Perhaps because I'm tainted by Zope 2's idea of the ZMI, though.
Per
Jeff Shell wrote:
I think this keeps Zope 3 as we know it alive, keeps the Zope brand
intact, and offers a future for Zope 2 and similar caliber desires for
a Big App Server while not interfering with the more "pure" and simple
concepts that makes Zope 3 appealing for developers like me.
I
Hi Reinhold,
schoolbell.app.browser.cvsimport.py
and I use the following:
def addObject(container, name, factory, **kwargs):
"""Creates and add object to container"""
# precondition may be necessary
content = removeAllProxies(zapi.createObject(factory,**kwargs))
notify(ObjectCr
On Mar 1, 2006, at 14:20, Stephan Richter wrote:
On Tuesday 28 February 2006 05:29, Håkan Johansson wrote:
Since I am still a newbie to Zope3, I don't know if those settings are
the "best" choice. At least it works now.
Can you make a bug collector issue for this bug? Many people have
repor
Hi,
On Thu, Mar 02, 2006 at 09:03:25AM +, Reinhold Strobl wrote:
> Hi,
>
> i am searching for a possibility to create and remove content objects in
> Python
> Code.
> Thanks for replies,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] > bin/zopectl debug # creating folder...
>>> root=debugger.root()
>>> from zope.app.
I'm with Max on this one.
What's the point? To save a few megabytes of harddisk space?
If you don't want the zope.bobo part of your zope3, ignore it. You
don't have to use it if you don't want to.
It's been a while but the last time I installed Plone it came with
stuff like CookieCrumbler and For
The idea has some benefits, but I'm not very sure it's a good idea. If
it should be implemented, this is how I would like to see it:
On 3/2/06, Jeff Shell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> - Zope 3 CA: The Zope Component Architecture. Core services. Would
> include zope.publisher and most other curre
Håkan Johansson wrote:
On Mar 1, 2006, at 14:20, Stephan Richter wrote:
On Tuesday 28 February 2006 05:29, Håkan Johansson wrote:
Since I am still a newbie to Zope3, I don't know if those settings are
the "best" choice. At least it works now.
Can you make a bug collector issue for this bug?
On 02.03.2006., at 12:41, Peter Bengtsson wrote:
I'm with Max on this one.
What's the point? To save a few megabytes of harddisk space?
If you don't want the zope.bobo part of your zope3, ignore it. You
don't have to use it if you don't want to.
not sure of what to think about this vision bu
On Thu, Mar 02, 2006 at 10:23:17AM +0100, Max M wrote:
> Canonical releases of compatible package collections is a *must*.
> Splitting it all up in small chunks that are out of sync would be a
> disaster.
but we already have that situation with current Products.
How many sites are still running
Jeff Shell wrote:
> - Zope 3 CA: The Zope Component Architecture. Core services. Would
> include zope.publisher and most other current top level zope.* things.
> Usable as a library, as a publisher for other environments, perhaps as a
> simple standalone server. Easy to deploy against WSGI, P
Paul Winkler wrote:
> On Thu, Mar 02, 2006 at 10:23:17AM +0100, Max M wrote:
>
>> Canonical releases of compatible package collections is a *must*.
>> Splitting it all up in small chunks that are out of sync would be a
>> disaster.
>>
>
> but we already have that situation with current Pr
On 3/2/06, Max M <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Jeff Shell wrote:
>
> >I think this keeps Zope 3 as we know it alive, keeps the Zope brand
> >intact, and offers a future for Zope 2 and similar caliber desires for
> >a Big App Server while not interfering with the more "pure" and simple
> >concepts th
Stefane Fermigier a écrit :
Paul Winkler wrote:
On Thu, Mar 02, 2006 at 10:23:17AM +0100, Max M wrote:
Canonical releases of compatible package collections is a *must*.
Splitting it all up in small chunks that are out of sync would be a
disaster.
but we already have that situation wi
Marko Mikulicic wrote:
On 02.03.2006., at 12:41, Peter Bengtsson wrote:
I'm with Max on this one.
What's the point? To save a few megabytes of harddisk space?
If you don't want the zope.bobo part of your zope3, ignore it. You
don't have to use it if you don't want to.
not sure of what to t
On Mar 2, 2006, at 6:41 AM, Peter Bengtsson wrote:
I'm with Max on this one.
What's the point? To save a few megabytes of harddisk space?
If you don't want the zope.bobo part of your zope3, ignore it. You
don't have to use it if you don't want to.
...
Let's keep it simple, bundle it all in one
On Thu, 02 Mar 2006 11:41:37 -, Peter Bengtsson
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
It's been a while but the last time I installed Plone it came with
stuff like CookieCrumbler and Formulator.
Heh, it no longer does :-)
What a bliss and time-saver!
It's not "unix-right" but I don't care, I have
On Thu, 02 Mar 2006 11:49:31 -, Lennart Regebro
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
This should be Zope3 as it is now. A couple of things can go away.
Maybe the rotterdam skin, I don't know. Definitely the default Folder
objects and such. People, especially Zope2 people, think that you are
supposed
Interesting. My angle on things is simplicity. I don't know or care
how it's reached as long as it's reached. (sort of)
You think the ONE package idea actually is confusing. You, as a
genuine real developer, find this mass of packages confusing. I
respect that.
Perhaps by having three packages ins
Brian, to use a poor analogy, Zope 2.x is the city with lots of signposts
and amenities developed by the community. Zope 3.x is the frontier town, and
most of the basic infrastructure is there but without the bells and whistles
or automated instance installer for Windows :)
For short term solution
Hello,
I've been assigned to present Zope in a local upcoming Python user group
meeting. As part of the assignment, I'm supposed to solve the PyWebOff
challenge using Zope:
http://pyre.third-bit.com/pyweb/challenge.html
I'd like to do this using Zope 3. However, I'm really struggling. I
I'm writing a folderish content class.
That has a site manager, and some children. And the site
manager has a catalog and some FieldIndex.
It looks like:
parent
+-- child-1
+-- child-2
+-- child-3
+-- ++etc++site
+-- default
+-- Intids
+-- Catalog
23 matches
Mail list logo
