Chris Withers wrote at 2009-4-2 20:22 +0100:
>Dieter Maurer wrote:
>> "SkinnedFolder" (at least if you mean
>> "http://www.handshake.de/~dieter/pyprojects/zope/index.html#bct_sec_4.7";)
>> makes "CMFCore"'s "SkinsTool" available (without the need to use
>> "CMFDefault" or portal objects).
>
>That m
Dieter Maurer wrote:
> "SkinnedFolder" (at least if you mean
> "http://www.handshake.de/~dieter/pyprojects/zope/index.html#bct_sec_4.7";)
> makes "CMFCore"'s "SkinsTool" available (without the need to use
> "CMFDefault" or portal objects).
That might involve getting support from you though, Dieter
Tim Nash wrote:
> If you are going to ignore my arguments about Plone being well tested,
it isn't.
> easy to install
it isn't.
> and having a better upgrade path than a customized
> solution like patching localFS,
it doesn't.
deal with it.
For whatever the OP is likely to want to do, he
Andreas Jung wrote:
> It basically about looking left and right and choosing the right tool
> for a problem. Installing Plone for your usecase is totally inadequate.
> It's like driving with a tank to the supermarket around the corner for
> buying a banana.
...a tank with some wheels missing, a ha
Tim Nash wrote:
> > Installing Plone in such a case is only the solution if one has no
> better idea about doing things
>
> *sigh* ...and people wonder why the zope community is dying.
That Zope community moved off and became the Plone community long ago.
I'd argue that anyone starting a new pr
Tim Nash wrote:
> Or you can install plone and know that it has been well tested, it is
> well maintained
Ho ho ho... surely you jest?!
> Look, you can do it anyway you want but if you want to imply that my
> suggestion to use Plone is 'insane' you need to come up with a better
> alternative
robert rottermann wrote:
> thedag...@gmail.com schrieb:
>> make that: LocalFS hasn't been updated since 2006.
> it still works fine,
> there is only a line you have to change in its code where it pulls in security
> from cmf to some other cmf module. when starting up cmf tells you what is
> wrong.
+---[ Tim Nash ]--
|
[snip long story about noone paying attention to the actual requirements]
I notice none of them installed plone either.
--
Andrew Milton
a...@theinternet.com.au
___
Zope maillist - Zope@zope.org
http://ma
Once upon a time there was a man walking down the street. He came upon two
neighbors in their driveways. One guy was washing his Z-Honda and the other
guy was working on his Z-MG-midget. The pedestrian said "Hey, I'm thinking
of getting a car to carry groceries home from the market" The Z-Honda guy
Andreas Jung wrote at 2009-3-28 14:13 -0500:
> ...
>Installing Plone in such a case is only the solution if one has no better
>idea about doing things. The Filesystem Directory View functionality
>is available out-of-the-box through CMF (which is much smaller than Plone).
>There was also something
thedag...@gmail.com wrote at 2009-3-28 00:16 +:
> ...
>LocalFS has [not] been updated since 2006.
>
>There is nothing in the zope world
>that is as well maintained as plone. Sorry.
I would like to stress that stable packages (those that do not need to
be continously updated) are in fact a qu
+---[ Tim Nash ]--
| Andrew,
| If you are going to ignore my arguments about Plone being well tested, easy
| to install and having a better upgrade path than a customized solution like
| patching localFS, then this is just a waste of everybody's time.
translation: If you
Andrew, If you are going to ignore my arguments about Plone being well
tested, easy to install and having a better upgrade path than a customized
solution like patching localFS, then this is just a waste
of everybody's time.
On Sat, Mar 28, 2009 at 1:33 PM, Andrew Milton wrote:
> +---[ Tim
+---[ Tim Nash ]--
| No your response and Jens response are totally inappropriate. We will never
| rebuild this community if all our posts are greeted with personal attacks.
You're not going to "rebuild" any community if given a choice of two
items, they're told to install
No your response and Jens response are totally inappropriate. We will never
rebuild this community if all our posts are greeted with personal attacks.
Using plone for the said usecase is not inappropriate especially since using
a directory view does not require using all of plone.
Please keep your
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 28.03.2009 14:32 Uhr, Tim Nash wrote:
>> Installing Plone in such a case is only the solution if one has no
> better idea about doing things
>
> *sigh* ...and people wonder why the zope community is dying.
>
> I have my very reasonable way of usin
> Installing Plone in such a case is only the solution if one has no better
idea about doing things
*sigh* ...and people wonder why the zope community is dying.
I have my very reasonable way of using zope/plone and personal attacks are
not going to change my mind.
On Sat, Mar 28, 2009 at 12:13
2009/3/28 Tim Nash
> I get your point, I just don't agree with it. It is often easier to just
> install plone than it is to:
> 1. search and discover LocalFS
> 2. decide if it is too old or if it can be satisfactorily patched.
> 3. patch it (thank you Robert)
> 4. test, test and test it.
> 5. Hop
I get your point, I just don't agree with it. It is often easier to just
install plone than it is to:
1. search and discover LocalFS
2. decide if it is too old or if it can be satisfactorily patched.
3. patch it (thank you Robert)
4. test, test and test it.
5. Hope that it still works in the next v
thedag...@gmail.com schrieb:
> make that: LocalFS hasn't been updated since 2006.
it still works fine,
there is only a line you have to change in its code where it pulls in security
from cmf to some other cmf module. when starting up cmf tells you what is wrong.
so its really easy to fix.
robert
>
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Mar 28, 2009, at 01:16 , thedag...@gmail.com wrote:
>> Telling someone to install all of Plone just to make filesystem
>> content available seems insane, sorry. There are several products out
>> there which can do the job, like LocalFS.
>
> LocalF
make that: LocalFS hasn't been updated since 2006.
There was a time when I would have agreed with you Jens, but the relentless
changes to Zope has worn me down. Now I use what Plone uses and I only
change zope versions when plone changes.
On Mar 27, 2009 5:16pm, thedag...@gmail.com wrote:
Telling someone to install all of Plone just to make filesystem
content available seems insane, sorry. There are several products out
there which can do the job, like LocalFS.
LocalFS has been updated since 2006. There is nothing in the zope world
that is as well maintained as plone. Sorry.
amol kumbhar wrote at 2009-3-27 18:39 +0530:
>Actually I want to use SmartClient for my web site and for this I have to
>add the SmartClient Library folder into zope so using this I can write JS
>which include these libraries.
If you have a web server before Zope (recommended for production use),
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Mar 27, 2009, at 18:11 , Tim Nash wrote:
> Or you may be able to use CMF 'Filesystem directory view'. The
> easiest way
> to do that is to use Plone 3.
Telling someone to install all of Plone just to make filesystem
content available seems i
Or you may be able to use CMF 'Filesystem directory view'. The easiest way
to do that is to use Plone 3.
I support the extjs javascript library two ways. In Plone I put the whole
extjs directory into a filesystem directory view. In Zope I drop extjs into
a directory served by apache.
-Tim
On F
Hello,
The best way to do it is probably to create a Zope product, and to put
your js library into this product.
Regards,
Eric
2009/3/27 amol kumbhar :
> Actually I want to use SmartClient for my web site and for this I have to
> add the SmartClient Library folder into zope so using this I can
Actually I want to use SmartClient for my web site and for this I have to
add the SmartClient Library folder into zope so using this I can write JS
which include these libraries.
On Fri, Mar 27, 2009 at 6:33 PM, Andreas Jung wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
> On 27.03.
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 27.03.2009 8:00 Uhr, amol kumbhar wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I want to add existing folder in zope. As we can add files by browsing
> how could I add existing folder.
>
This question does not make any sense. Anything existing can not be
added. What do you
Hi,
I want to add existing folder in zope. As we can add files by browsing how
could I add existing folder.
Thanks,
Amol.
___
Zope maillist - Zope@zope.org
http://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope
** No cross posts or HTML encoding! **
(Related
30 matches
Mail list logo
