On Tue, Oct 09, 2001 at 08:44:24AM -0400, Richard Hebert wrote: > That's the whole bit.. : ) Several more applications have a problem with this >gcc..
If you could be specific, there is http://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/ > can i update without breaking anything ? Nope, g++ 3.0.x is binary incompatible with 2.95.x, 2.96-RH (and already binary incompatible with g++ 3.1), so no, you cannot upgrade without breaking everything. > There is a version 3 of gcc ..will RH give us packs that go along tat line and >correct this situation ? There are gcc3 rpms in rawhide (though gcc3 is in there as secondary system compiler, not primary), but a) they got far less testing than 2.96-RH (which got more than 1.5 years of heavy testing) b) is deployed ATM less than 2.96-RH, thus more issues probably will come up as time goes by c) gcc 3.x is not able to compile glibc correctly (we're testing a patch though) d) g++ 3.0.x is not able to build KDE correctly Quoting GCC release manager from yesterday: > You asked whether GCC 3.0.2 will work with KDE2. The answer is no; we'll > just keep iterating until we get a release that does. It's too bad that > this is still broken. If you can send me a small test case, I'll try to > work on it for GCC 3.0.3. Jakub _______________________________________________ Seawolf-list mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/seawolf-list
