Thanks Jordi. FYI, consulting with our technical team about this.
Regards Sunny On 15/05/2019 12:20 am, JORDI PALET MARTINEZ wrote: > Hi Aftab, > > If you don’t get my emails in the list, it may be due to DMARC. Email > servers (such as mine), using DMARC, may get rejected by clients of > mailing lists if the mailing list is keeping my email instead of using > the list one. > > It may happen that the APNIC list is not correctly configured? > > In all the other RIRs and IETF, this has been “fixed” in mailman long > time ago. > > > Regards, > > Jordi > > El 14/5/19 16:09, "Aftab Siddiqui" <[email protected] > <mailto:[email protected]>> escribió: > > Hi Jordi, > > You can always bring any topic to apnic-talk mailing list for > discussion. Not everything has to be discussed on policy-sig mailing list. > > And somehow I’m not receiving your emails sent to the policy-sig mailing > list :) > > On Tue, 14 May 2019 at 11:15 pm, Srinivas Chendi <[email protected] > <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote: > > Hi Jordi, > > Thanks for your contribution to this discussion so far. > > As per the SIG Guidelines, Policy SIG Chair is responsible to accept or > reject a proposal and to check if it is in scope of the active SIG > charter. > > Please refer to the section 2.4 of SIG Guidelines > https://www.apnic.net/community/participate/sigs/sig-guidelines/ > > <snip> > Accept or reject proposals for discussion at the forthcoming SIG (and > suggest an alternative forum if the topic is not relevant to that > particular SIG) [1] > > [1] The Chair may decide that a proposal is not suitable for discussion > at the forthcoming SIG session if: > > The proposal is out of scope for the SIG > The proposal is insufficiently developed to be the basis for a > useful discussion > The agenda has already been filled by topics of greater priority > </snip> > > Regards > Sunny > > On 14/05/2019 8:11 pm, JORDI PALET MARTINEZ wrote: > > I’m not interpreting the PDP as part of that, however, I’m fine > if the > > staff confirms that it is in-scope according to their understanding. > > > > We have a recent experience of policies (resource hijacking is a > policy > > violation) being declared out-of-scope in ARIN by the AC. I know > the PDP > > is very different, but let’s make sure we don’t have this situation > > replicated in other APNIC. > > > > > > Regards, > > > > Jordi > > > > El 11/5/19 18:05, "Owen DeLong" <[email protected] > <mailto:[email protected]> > > <mailto:[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>>> escribió: > > > > > > On May 11, 2019, at 06:13, JORDI PALET MARTINEZ > > <[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]> > <mailto:[email protected] > <mailto:[email protected]>>> wrote: > > > > Just to make it clear. Do you believe that the PDP update is > out of > > the scope? > > > > No > > > > > > > > I think that the PDP is not related to resource management, > but the > > “self-management” of the way the community discusses the resource > > management and agree on the way it should be managed. > > > > The pdp is absolutely related to the management of resources in > that it > > is the process by which we develop those policies. > > > > > > > > And for me as more we restrict the wording, more risks to wrongly > > get things that today are in-scope, to be left out. > > > > Agreed. However, in my view, your proposal is not less > restrictive, just > > more verbose. > > > > Owen > > > > > > > > > > Regards, > > > > Jordi > > > > El 11/5/19 1:27, "Owen DeLong" <[email protected] > <mailto:[email protected]> > > <mailto:[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>>> escribió: > > > > That’s not more generic, Jordi, it’s just more words. > > > > There’s nothing within the scope of the policy manual or its > updates > > that doesn’t relate to the management and use of internet address > > resources. > > > > Owen > > > > > > > > > > On May 10, 2019, at 09:30 , JORDI PALET MARTINEZ > > <[email protected] > <mailto:[email protected]> > <mailto:[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>>> > > wrote: > > > > Hi Paul, all, > > > > I feel that this proposed charter is not good enough. > > > > Let me try to explain it. > > > > In RIPE we have a WG for every kind of “topic”, for example, > > addressing, abuse, routing, etc. The PDP updates are > discussed > > in the “plenary” (we have recent small update and this > was not > > really clear). > > > > However, in all the other regions, all the “topics” are > within > > the same “unique” WG. There is an exception for ARIN (if I’m > > correct) where the PDP is not part of this “policy discussion > > group”. > > > > The proposed charter, may fail to cover for example the PDP > > update, but I feel there are many other topics that may be in > > the future in the same situation. > > > > So why not something more generic in the line of: > > > > “The Policy SIG charter is to develop policies which > relate to > > the management and use of Internet address resources > within the > > Asia Pacific region, including any topics under the scope > of the > > Policy manual or updates of it”. > > > > > > Regards, > > > > Jordi > > > > El 9/5/19 23:51, "Paul Wilson" > > <[email protected] > <mailto:[email protected]> > > <mailto:[email protected] > <mailto:[email protected]>>en nombre > > [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]> > <mailto:[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>>> escribió: > > > > Dear Sumon and all, > > > > To reduce confusion over ISP/LIR/etc terminology, perhaps the > > charter could be stated more simply, along these lines: > > > > “The Policy SIG charter is to develop policies which > relate to > > the management and use of Internet address resources > within the > > Asia Pacific region. …” > > > > My 2c, with best regards, > > > > > ________________________________________________________________________ > > Paul Wilson, Director-General, APNIC [email protected] > <mailto:[email protected]> > > <mailto:[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>> > > http://www.apnic.net <http://www.apnic.net/>@apnicdg > > > > On 9 May 2019, at 19:53, Sumon Ahmed Sabir wrote: > > > > Thank you very much Aftab and Owen for your constructive > > feedback. We will definitely consider those views. > > > > If any one has any different perspective please jump > in and > > share your thoughts. > > > > Sincerely, > > > > Sumon > > > > On Mon, May 6, 2019 at 10:52 AM Owen DeLong > <[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]> > > <mailto:[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>>> wrote: > > > > Aftab, I think you misread the proposed language. > > > > First, neither the current version nor the proposed > > version refer to members at all, but to the > actions of > > the APNIC, NIRs, and ISPs. The one change I think > should > > be made there is to replace ISPs with LIRs since > not all > > LIRs are technically ISPs, though that is > certainly the > > most common case. > > > > As to your “not limited to” or “services related to > > resources”, I fail to see how that is not > addressed by > > the proposed “…and related services”. > > > > I support the language proposed by Sumon whether > or not > > he chooses to take my NIR suggestion. > > > > Owen > > > > > > > > > > > > On May 5, 2019, at 03:21 , Aftab Siddiqui > > <[email protected] > <mailto:[email protected]> > > <mailto:[email protected] > <mailto:[email protected]>>> wrote: > > > > Thanks Sumon bhai for the initiative, > > > > <nitpik> > > > > Revised text suggest that all members/resource > > holders in APNIC are ISPs only, I would > suggest to > > make it "APNIC and NIR members or resource > holders > > in Asia Pacific region". Because not all > members are > > resource holders. > > > > Secondly, when you start mentioning topics in the > > charter then it may create confusion > moving forward > > that only these topics can be covered so how > about > > adding "not limited to" or "services related to > > resources" or something like that. > > > > </nitpik> > > > > Regards, > > > > Aftab A. Siddiqui > > > > On Sun, May 5, 2019 at 4:31 PM Sumon Ahmed Sabir > > <[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]> > <mailto:[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>>> wrote: > > > > Dear Members, > > > > > > > > > > > > In the last APNIC meeting in Daejoan > there was a > > discussion that there is a perception > > > > That Policy SIG discusses only about “Address > > Policy”. On the other hand there is a > understanding > > > > that Policy SIG covers a wider range of > registry > > issues, RPKI or any other topics that > requires a > > > > procedures and rules. > > > > > > > > > > > > To avoid confusion and to bring clarity > in the > > Policy Charter few proposals came in. That > > either we can change the Name of the > Policy SIG > > to cover wider range or to amend the > Policy-SIG > > Charter to bring clarity about the scope of > > Policy SIG. > > > > > > > > > > > > After discussions chairs feels that we > can make > > some changes in the SIG Charter to bring > clarity: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Current SIG Charter > > https://www.apnic.net/community/policy/policy-sig/ says: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > ‘The Policy SIG charter is to develop > policies > > and procedures which relate to the > management and > > > > use of Internet address resources by APNIC, > > NIRs, and ISPs within the Asia Pacific > region.” > > > > > > > > > > > > And here is the possible changes proposed: > > > > > > > > > > > > “The Policy SIG charter is to develop > policies > > which relate to the management and use of > > Internet address resources by APNIC, NIRs, > > and ISPs within the Asia Pacific region. > These > > include policies for resource allocation, > > recovery and transfer, and for resource > > registration within whois, reverse DNS, > RPKI and > > related services.” > > > > > > > > > > > > Please share your views, comments or > suggestions > > in this regard. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Sincerely, > > > > > > > > > > > > Sumon, Bertrand and Ching-Heng > > > > Chairs, Policy-SIG > > > > * sig-policy: APNIC SIG on > > resource management policy * > > > _______________________________________________ > > sig-policy mailing list > > [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]> > > <mailto:[email protected] > <mailto:[email protected]>> > > https://mailman.apnic.net/mailman/listinfo/sig-policy > > > > * sig-policy: APNIC SIG on resource > > management policy * > > _______________________________________________ > > sig-policy mailing list > > [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]> > > <mailto:[email protected] > <mailto:[email protected]>> > > https://mailman.apnic.net/mailman/listinfo/sig-policy > > > > * sig-policy: APNIC SIG on resource management policy * > > _______________________________________________ > > sig-policy mailing list > > [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]> > <mailto:[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>> > > https://mailman.apnic.net/mailman/listinfo/sig-policy > > > > * sig-policy: APNIC SIG on resource management policy * > > _______________________________________________ sig-policy > > mailing [email protected] > <mailto:[email protected]> > > <mailto:[email protected] > > <mailto:[email protected]>>https://mailman.apnic.net/mailman/listinfo/sig-policy > > > > > > ********************************************** > > IPv4 is over > > Are you ready for the new Internet ? > > http://www.theipv6company.com <http://www.theipv6company.com/> > > The IPv6 Company > > > > This electronic message contains information which may be > > privileged or confidential. The information is intended to be > > for the exclusive use of the individual(s) named above and > > further non-explicilty authorized disclosure, copying, > > distribution or use of the contents of this information, > even if > > partially, including attached files, is strictly > prohibited and > > will be considered a criminal offense. If you are not the > > intended recipient be aware that any disclosure, copying, > > distribution or use of the contents of this information, > even if > > partially, including attached files, is strictly prohibited, > > will be considered a criminal offense, so you must reply > to the > > original sender to inform about this communication and > delete it. > > > > * sig-policy: APNIC SIG on resource management > > policy * > > _______________________________________________ > > sig-policy mailing list > > [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]> > <mailto:[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>> > > https://mailman.apnic.net/mailman/listinfo/sig-policy > > > > > > ********************************************** > > IPv4 is over > > Are you ready for the new Internet ? > > http://www.theipv6company.com > > The IPv6 Company > > > > This electronic message contains information which may be > privileged > > or confidential. The information is intended to be for the > exclusive > > use of the individual(s) named above and further non-explicilty > > authorized disclosure, copying, distribution or use of the > contents > > of this information, even if partially, including attached > files, is > > strictly prohibited and will be considered a criminal offense. If > > you are not the intended recipient be aware that any disclosure, > > copying, distribution or use of the contents of this information, > > even if partially, including attached files, is strictly > prohibited, > > will be considered a criminal offense, so you must reply to the > > original sender to inform about this communication and delete it. > > > > > > ********************************************** > > IPv4 is over > > Are you ready for the new Internet ? > > http://www.theipv6company.com > > The IPv6 Company > > > > This electronic message contains information which may be > privileged or > > confidential. The information is intended to be for the exclusive > use of > > the individual(s) named above and further non-explicilty authorized > > disclosure, copying, distribution or use of the contents of this > > information, even if partially, including attached files, is > strictly > > prohibited and will be considered a criminal offense. If you are > not the > > intended recipient be aware that any disclosure, copying, > distribution > > or use of the contents of this information, even if partially, > including > > attached files, is strictly prohibited, will be considered a > criminal > > offense, so you must reply to the original sender to inform about > this > > communication and delete it. > > > > > > * sig-policy: APNIC SIG on resource management > policy * > > _______________________________________________ > > sig-policy mailing list > > [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]> > > https://mailman.apnic.net/mailman/listinfo/sig-policy > > > * sig-policy: APNIC SIG on resource management policy > * > _______________________________________________ > sig-policy mailing list > [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]> > https://mailman.apnic.net/mailman/listinfo/sig-policy > > -- > > Regards, > > Aftab A. Siddiqui > > > ********************************************** > IPv4 is over > Are you ready for the new Internet ? > http://www.theipv6company.com > The IPv6 Company > > This electronic message contains information which may be privileged or > confidential. The information is intended to be for the exclusive use of > the individual(s) named above and further non-explicilty authorized > disclosure, copying, distribution or use of the contents of this > information, even if partially, including attached files, is strictly > prohibited and will be considered a criminal offense. If you are not the > intended recipient be aware that any disclosure, copying, distribution > or use of the contents of this information, even if partially, including > attached files, is strictly prohibited, will be considered a criminal > offense, so you must reply to the original sender to inform about this > communication and delete it. > * sig-policy: APNIC SIG on resource management policy * _______________________________________________ sig-policy mailing list [email protected] https://mailman.apnic.net/mailman/listinfo/sig-policy
