Hey Steve,
I understood that...
Dan ;-))
________________________________
From: Norton, Steve [mailto:stephen.nor...@ngc.com]
Sent: Saturday, October 18, 2008 12:21 PM
To: silver-list@eskimo.com
Subject: Re: CS>blue moons revisited
I apologize iin advance for getting in this issue but are you
familiar with the Myers-Briggs Type Indicator (MTBI)? While you cannot
determine someones personality type from postings you can get some
indications. Indi, I would guess you as something close to an ISTJ and
Ode closer to an INTP. Google the type or MBTI and you will get more
info than you want. The point I want to make is not your type but to
point out that you both have different personalities that color your
view of the world. As do I and every member of this list. We each will
look at what Ode has done and make our own evaluation of the methods and
results independently. I appreciate the information Ode has provided
since it is information I would not have otherwise.
You, Ode and I each have different standards for determining
what is acceptable 'proof' but that does not make any others standard
unacceptable as a criteria. You can use your criteria without insisting
that everyone else use it too. The problem with hard scientific proof is
that is that such proof is often unachievable and that lack of such
proof if required prevents release of otherwise useful information.
Ode provided his information and test methodology and I think
that is sufficient for one to understand and evaluate the data.
- Steve N
----- Original Message -----
From: Indi <indule...@comcast.net>
To: silver-list@eskimo.com <silver-list@eskimo.com>
Sent: Sat Oct 18 08:40:18 2008
Subject: Re: CS>blue moons revisited
You'd probably want to send it to a lab. Around three hundred
dollars for
true answers. I realize it isn't cheap (or even affordable for
most of us).
A good chemical analysis is not something an untrained person
can do at home.
People get degrees in chemistry, you know. :)
As I've said before, my point is speaking in ABSOLUTES is
irresponsible when
your "testing" is so rudimentary.
"Feelings", anecdotal evidence, belief, etc do not disprove this
point one bit.
Sorry if that gvets people's dander up, but I am not about to
abandon
all principles of critical thinking just because some here want
to make
unsubstantiated claims. Data is data. Either one has it or one
doesn't.
:)
indi
On Sat, Oct 18, 2008 at 11:45:05PM +1030, Neville wrote:
>
> ----- Original Message ----- From: "Indi"
<indule...@comcast.net>
> To: <silver-list@eskimo.com>
> Sent: Saturday, October 18, 2008 2:53 AM
> Subject: Re: CS>blue moons revisited
>
>
> Quote:
> [armed with only an EC meter and a laser pointer, for the
simple reason
> that those devices are not enough to *prove* your claims (in
scientific
> terms).]
>
> In the absence of suitable laboratory testing equipment, in
the home,
> which is where most users involved with EICS are, perhaps you
could steer
> me in the direction of a more accurate, better or more
suitable
> instrument so that I may be able to assess my EICS in a more
acceptable
> and precise manner. I for one would certainly be most
grateful in the
> knowledge that there are other instruments available, other
than EC
> meters etc, which are available and affordable over the
counter to
> everyone in their homes, but I don't know what is available to
me, other
> than the instrument I currently use. If you know something I
don't then
> I would be humbly grateful if you would pass it on, but it
must be
> affordable and available over the counter to everyone who is
involved
> with EICS..........in their own homes.
>
> It's fine for those who may be scientifically minded and/or
have access
> to more precise instruments, but I think most EICS users are
just plain
> ordinary folk using equipment that is affordable and readily
available.
> Tell me what else I can use that fits the above criteria and
I'll go out
> and get one, but remember, it must fit the above criteria so
that perhaps
> we can all go out and get one.
>
> N.
>
>
> --
> The Silver List is a moderated forum for discussing Colloidal
Silver.
>
> Instructions for unsubscribing are posted at:
http://silverlist.org
>
> To post, address your message to: silver-list@eskimo.com
>
> Address Off-Topic messages to:
silver-off-topic-l...@eskimo.com
>
> The Silver List and Off Topic List archives are currently
down...
>
> List maintainer: Mike Devour <mdev...@eskimo.com>
>
>
